The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".
This thread is for general discussion of pages.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM
I've read roughly the first half of Nana and Kaoru and would vote to keep just based on what I've read. It's very ecchi but there's no pornographic material outside the few times that scenes from Kaoru's porn mags are shown on-page, and (at least up to the point I made it to) there was nothing remotely pedopandering.
Peter Is the Wolf is easy: the site's main page
links to two versions, one Adults Only, and one aimed at a slightly more general audience. The former is basically the same as the latter, but with some sex scenes thrown in. Therefore, we only trope the "general" version.
It's already listed under The Content Policy, I was replying to Septimus' question from last page
.
...I didn't notice that was over a week ago now, I thought he asked it today.
Edited by FernandoLemon on Sep 6th 2022 at 7:35:18 AM
So while browsing the suspended thread, I came across Succubus & Hitman. From what I've seen on the page, it's mostly about rape and doesn't seem to have much of a plot. I haven't read the manga, but the trope list gives me the impression that there's not much plot besides the NSFW stuff.
SING TO ME, LEND ME THE SONG OF BLASPHEMY
HoMM Fan
I remember the Death By Sex example on there has come up at least once before, as well as the Big Prick, Big Problems entry.
"Grandmaster Combat, son!"I've updated the opening post to account for the change in technical aspects of flagging.
I kind of wonder if we need to have both the content policy thread and this one, or whether we can fold them into one thread.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI think the only purpose of this thread is "does this need a review or cleanup?" questions, which "P5 Cleanup pile and lewdness issues" kinda does also, so if folding is an option then maybe with that.
TroperWall / WikiMagic CleanupThat "P5 Cleanup pile and lewdness issues" thread is actually more like for cleaning up text, not for deciding whether something needs to be flagged or not. I don't think it's that similar to the threads in this forum.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 11th 2022 at 11:12:24 AM
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanI've meant that neither really needs discussion if something should be flagged, either it's something that can be cleaned quickly or should just get flagged and let others check if it's warranted.
TroperWall / WikiMagic CleanupHeya, I was wick cleaning when I stumbled across this Harry Potter fic: The Power of Seven. This might just be me being prudish, but I was caught off-guard by the premise and didn't know if it qualified as flag-worthy or not. Not to, uh, yuck anyone's yum, but I'm not totally sure about "rewrite of the last 1.5 books where Voldemort has to be defeated by harem sex magic"...
Vehicle-Based Characterization | Grief-Induced Split | Locker Mail
Already has a thread
here. Feel free to add comments.
Oops, my bad, thank you! Commented.
Vehicle-Based Characterization | Grief-Induced Split | Locker Mail"Judge individual spinoffs based on pedo-pandering" is rather different from "cut all the H-spinoffs." Apparently, there was only one problematic work in the corpus, and one H-spinoff that was absolutely plot-relevant (Honey, Hold Me Tightly! was where the Official Couple confessed to each other - going out on a limb here, but I'm calling that important!).
So I do not believe there was a consensus to cut all the spinoffs. I'm reading 3 votes for "let's judge the spinoffs individually."
Edited by Ramidel on Sep 18th 2022 at 1:13:40 AM
Problem is that some people mentioned that some of the spinoffs have paedobait concerns, not just hentai. Even wih a plot, that would be a problem. I've revised the close a bit, though.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

That is quite tame compared to some of the other works we have up? Like I think High School DXD has more intense stuff than that we passed.
Like I really doubt we'd do anything for that.
Hasnt it already been passed?
Edit : Yes it has been approved here for like a decade now
Edited by miraculous on Aug 27th 2022 at 3:45:34 AM
"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."