TVTropes Now available in the app store!
Open

Follow TV Tropes

Following

The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

Go To

The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".

This thread is for general discussion of pages.

Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM

miraculous Goku Black (Apprentice)
Goku Black
#14476: Aug 27th 2022 at 3:42:40 PM

That is quite tame compared to some of the other works we have up? Like I think High School DXD has more intense stuff than that we passed.

Like I really doubt we'd do anything for that.

Hasnt it already been passed?

Edit : Yes it has been approved here for like a decade now

Edited by miraculous on Aug 27th 2022 at 3:45:34 AM

"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."
ChloeJessica Since: Jun, 2020 Relationship Status: Awaiting my mail-order bride
#14477: Aug 27th 2022 at 3:51:05 PM

fair enough. (don't think there's any way i could have known that, though...)

miraculous Goku Black (Apprentice)
Goku Black
#14478: Aug 27th 2022 at 3:53:41 PM

Uh it's okay. I normally just double check the search forum first if I'm going to report something.

"That's right mortal. By channeling my divine rage into power, I have forged a new instrument in which to destroy you."
Willbyr Hi (Y2K) Relationship Status: With my statistically significant other
Hi
#14479: Aug 28th 2022 at 7:48:04 PM

I've read roughly the first half of Nana and Kaoru and would vote to keep just based on what I've read. It's very ecchi but there's no pornographic material outside the few times that scenes from Kaoru's porn mags are shown on-page, and (at least up to the point I made it to) there was nothing remotely pedopandering.

FernandoLemon Since: Aug, 2015
#14480: Sep 6th 2022 at 6:04:03 AM

Peter Is the Wolf is easy: the site's main page links to two versions, one Adults Only, and one aimed at a slightly more general audience. The former is basically the same as the latter, but with some sex scenes thrown in. Therefore, we only trope the "general" version.

Ramidel Since: Jan, 2001
#14481: Sep 6th 2022 at 12:25:17 PM

Hold on, we'd need to decide whether the adult version qualifies as pure porn first.

FernandoLemon Since: Aug, 2015
#14482: Sep 6th 2022 at 3:34:46 PM

It's already listed under The Content Policy, I was replying to Septimus' question from last page.

...I didn't notice that was over a week ago now, I thought he asked it today.

Edited by FernandoLemon on Sep 6th 2022 at 7:35:18 AM

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#14483: Sep 7th 2022 at 2:39:44 AM

Well, the question still needs answering. Anyhow, I've put these explanations in now only Demonbane and RE-TAKE need them.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Excessive-Menace Time to SLEEP from the Velvet Cage (Fifth Year at Tropey's) Relationship Status: Dancing with myself
Time to SLEEP
#14484: Sep 8th 2022 at 7:56:51 PM

So while browsing the suspended thread, I came across Succubus & Hitman. From what I've seen on the page, it's mostly about rape and doesn't seem to have much of a plot. I haven't read the manga, but the trope list gives me the impression that there's not much plot besides the NSFW stuff.

SING TO ME, LEND ME THE SONG OF BLASPHEMY
Tonwen HoMM Fan from Axeoth Since: Dec, 2021 Relationship Status: I <3 love!
HoMM Fan
#14485: Sep 8th 2022 at 8:03:49 PM

I remember the Death By Sex example on there has come up at least once before, as well as the Big Prick, Big Problems entry.

"Grandmaster Combat, son!"
Ramidel Since: Jan, 2001
#14486: Sep 8th 2022 at 10:09:56 PM

[up][up]Not much but more than an Excuse Plot from the looks of it.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#14487: Sep 10th 2022 at 2:51:22 AM

I've updated the opening post to account for the change in technical aspects of flagging.

I kind of wonder if we need to have both the content policy thread and this one, or whether we can fold them into one thread.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Amonimus the "Retromancer" from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the "Retromancer"
#14488: Sep 10th 2022 at 9:11:39 PM

I think the only purpose of this thread is "does this need a review or cleanup?" questions, which "P5 Cleanup pile and lewdness issues" kinda does also, so if folding is an option then maybe with that.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#14489: Sep 11th 2022 at 2:12:02 AM

That "P5 Cleanup pile and lewdness issues" thread is actually more like for cleaning up text, not for deciding whether something needs to be flagged or not. I don't think it's that similar to the threads in this forum.

Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 11th 2022 at 11:12:24 AM

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Amonimus the "Retromancer" from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the "Retromancer"
#14490: Sep 11th 2022 at 2:16:41 AM

I've meant that neither really needs discussion if something should be flagged, either it's something that can be cleaned quickly or should just get flagged and let others check if it's warranted.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
Yindee Just stoic wisdom. from New England Since: Jul, 2016
Just stoic wisdom.
#14491: Sep 11th 2022 at 8:48:29 PM

Heya, I was wick cleaning when I stumbled across this Harry Potter fic: The Power of Seven. This might just be me being prudish, but I was caught off-guard by the premise and didn't know if it qualified as flag-worthy or not. Not to, uh, yuck anyone's yum, but I'm not totally sure about "rewrite of the last 1.5 books where Voldemort has to be defeated by harem sex magic"...

Vehicle-Based Characterization | Grief-Induced Split | Locker Mail
underCoverSailsman Peeks from Under Rocks from State of Flux Since: Jan, 2021 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Peeks from Under Rocks
#14492: Sep 11th 2022 at 9:16:53 PM

[up]Already has a thread here. Feel free to add comments.

Yindee Just stoic wisdom. from New England Since: Jul, 2016
Ramidel Since: Jan, 2001
#14494: Sep 16th 2022 at 12:24:37 PM

On Don't Meddle With My Daughter: I thought that there was no consensus to remove mention of the explicit spinoffs as a group, only to clean the page and ban individual spinoffs that might violate policy.

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#14495: Sep 18th 2022 at 1:48:23 AM

Hmm. I must say, that's a very subtle distinction and I don't think folks were cutting it that fine.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Ramidel Since: Jan, 2001
#14496: Sep 18th 2022 at 2:09:07 AM

"Judge individual spinoffs based on pedo-pandering" is rather different from "cut all the H-spinoffs." Apparently, there was only one problematic work in the corpus, and one H-spinoff that was absolutely plot-relevant (Honey, Hold Me Tightly! was where the Official Couple confessed to each other - going out on a limb here, but I'm calling that important!).

So I do not believe there was a consensus to cut all the spinoffs. I'm reading 3 votes for "let's judge the spinoffs individually."

Edited by Ramidel on Sep 18th 2022 at 1:13:40 AM

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#14497: Sep 18th 2022 at 2:35:18 AM

Problem is that some people mentioned that some of the spinoffs have paedobait concerns, not just hentai. Even wih a plot, that would be a problem. I've revised the close a bit, though.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman
Ramidel Since: Jan, 2001
#14498: Sep 18th 2022 at 2:37:21 AM

Right, thanks. Can you also edit the mod notice on the page? (Because some of the "hentai" spinoffs are not PWP or pedo.)

SeptimusHeap from Switzerland (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Mu
#14499: Sep 18th 2022 at 2:38:41 AM

That's done too.

"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman

Total posts: 14,910
Top