The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

They're part of ads run here without work pages that I'm aware of. I'm logging them here just in case the P5 wants to make sure they should not have pages.

TBH, the ads themselves aren't prurient, it's just what they link to.

EDIT: Rewarding My Student with Sex makes #8. I'm just reading pages on this website and suddenly... "I'll let you touch my boobs", says a teacher as an incentive to a student.

Edited by Brainulator9 on Feb 6th 2020 at 2:02:22 PM

If they're ads, then report them in the ad thread.

As a general rules thing, having ads and having pages were treated differently. Having a page about a thing merely acknowledges that it exists and there is something to say. Having ads is a direct endorsement and thus was beholden to stricter no-porn criteria. Same went for fanfic recs.

Yeah, these ads are a major no-no, but only the staff can block them.

I suppose you're already aware of this, but it was announced that Interspecies Reviewers's airing on Tokyo MX was cancelled as well:

"After careful consideration, we determined that this series falls outside of our standards."

And they pulled out the series altogether instead of being editted out. So it's not just the west that has issues with it, but Japan as well. Who would have thought?

re-posting from general cleanup thread:

Literature.Miss Mars

I ran into the page during cleanup. It's not cross-wicked and not even indexed. It was created in 2012 and the launcher was last active in 2017.

The description said is was QUOTE extremely fetishy UNQUOTE. I changed it to 'very fetish-y' for now. But perhaps we should cut the page entirely?

It's full of ZCE (now commented out) and it might be too lewd on the Administrivia.No Lewdness No Prudishness scale. The examples with context that remain on the page seem okay though — nothing creepy or too lewd in them.

If you think we can and should keep it, please somebody at least index it. I don't feel like doing it myself as I don't want to click on some fetish story, apparently about pregnant women.

Is this too detailed? From Caught with Your Pants Down:

Personally, I wouldn't say so; it reads as maybe-overly-descriptive but not lurid. That said, the important part of the trope is the first sentence; everything after that is more of a case of The Loins Sleep Tonight and could possibly make for an example there if it's not already.

Edited by Willbyr on Feb 10th 2020 at 1:42:55 PM

Wouldn't deleting Interspecies Reviewers just make the issue a little bit worse?

"Oh! This is so bad that not even TV Tropes has a page for it! Now this is totally worth looking into!"

Edited by Psyga315 on Feb 10th 2020 at 2:18:49 AM

I mean, based on that you could argue that we shouldn't have deleted any pages

And let's be real, nobody is going to be shocked that TV Tropes deleted a page for a work so racy that even one of its original Japanese networks pulled it.

I mean, even just reading the page there's a ton of lewd details, because describing sex with tons of women is literally the premise...

No, Streisand happens when somebody tries to use their clout to target every other copy. We'll just not have a page on deleted stuff, whatever people do when they see the lack of it is none of our business.

Tbh, after looking into, Reviewers manga is much more on the comedy and less porny (i.e. anime fills in the Fade to Black spots). So that could potentially stay, just with a disclaimer not to gush about added smut in the adaptation.

Number 9 for Coolmic: Bullied Boy's Tongue Revenge.

Apparently the manga is much cleaner than the anime (which is why it caught everyone by surprise), so even if we decide against the anime, the manga can probably stay.

I'll try to read the manga later.

Okay, I read the first ten chapters of the manga, and it's definitely not porn. The sex is entirely offscreen and not even described in all that much detail. It's got fanservice, obviously, but not really that much considering the content. Far worse things have gotten easy passes from us.

Reviewing the anime will be trickier, since Funimation took down their videos. Anyone know where to find it? Sub or dub is fine.

It's still on Animelab in Australia. Only the first episode had the dub released.

Be aware that the animators admitted that their goal was to get dirtier with every episode, so it's probably be better to watch later ones to see how porny it gets.

Great, is this Animaniacs levels of making the censors cry?

Wikipedia article for the studio. Works by Passione include Rail Wars, High School Dx D Hero, and Citrus.

I saw part of one episode. Lewd yes, but not that bad. Will watch more because I can see this getting a lot more nsfw. Though even with the extra graphicness, I'd say this is probably a keep.

Edited by DrPsyche on Feb 11th 2020 at 7:53:04 AM

So, for the F3 Manga, am I allowed to redlink it, even though Wikipedia calls it Hentai?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F3_(manga)

I suppose we can keep it from being Lewd, or at least I can, since I was wanting to trope it for the Alliterative List and Alliterative Title...

The protocol is not to link it, since we don't want that page.

Coolmic #10: Sex in the Sleeping Bag. Can I Join You? The website in some areas cuts off the title to just the first five words, omitting the period. Either way, it's not getting a pass here, plain and simple.

Okay, started the Interspecies Reviewers anime. First episode is pretty much as bad as the worst of the manga; so skeevy, but not porn. But since people said it gets worse, I checked out the second episode. It's definitely worse, but I'd say still not actual porn.

Funimation gave up after episode 5, right?

Edited by Discar on Feb 14th 2020 at 11:11:20 AM

I think that's right, but IIRC episode 3 was the one that first made Funi do a "Watch out, we've got a hentai over here."

Edited by Willbyr on Feb 15th 2020 at 6:41:28 AM

From what I can get, they gave up after Episode 3, and they didn't bother with Episode 4, after seeing what kind of content were dealing with. That's where they pulled the plug,

I've been wondering this for a while, and I've decided to finally ask about it:

Uzi's Drugged Adventure. It's a game Pikasprey did a playthrough of, and it's full of sexually-charged humor and the protagonist, Uzi, looks like a kid- but is apparently an adult. Yeah, it's one of those works. But, watching his playthrough, the only sexual stuff is the dialogue- there's nothing that actually happens, and there's certainly nothing that Uzi actually does that's at all sexual, as it's just an RPG Maker game with basic RPG maker assets.

So, is having a lot of sexually-inappropriate dialogue and a very-immature looking protagonist enough to qualify as crossing the line, or is it something we could make a page for? It's got a lot of tropes, so I very easily could make a page if it isn't deemed too far.