The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

@ Dr Psyche: Indeed it is. The game has a separate page.

Alright, the verdict on Awkward Silence. Angelhead. The sex scenes are more graphic than I'd anticipated, but they're short and not as graphic as some of the stuff I've angelheaded. Also, there isn't a lot of them, mostly story focused.

Weird thing though, When I vote it asks for a disposition as if there have already been 3 votes to keep or cut. Why is that? There doesn't seem to be any other angel or devil heads on it.

EDIT: Some of these reports are just for site errors, Growling Gut especially has a bunch. Can I zap them?

And there's some not kosher reports for Lolita.

Edited by DrPsyche on Sep 4th 2018 at 8:45:41 AM

I can see that the whole CVR has been neglected for a while.

I've PMed red123 and Zombie Dude about their flags. Banned Neko Mizu, they have no other contributions. All these invalid/bogus flags can be cleared.

The disposition request thing may be a bug. Something for Query Bugs perhaps?

Thanks, Zapped those posts. Will take the other issue to Querey Bugs tomorrow.

Not sure if this is the right place to report it to, but someone created Demonophobia despite the game, as far as I know, being cut content. Am on mobile (on a bus) and figured reporting it here was the sensible option?

I went ahead and cutlisted that page.

Looking at Pink De Pink right now. So far it's looking to get a Devilhead. Very pornographic and the story is largely based around the porn.

Pink de Pink is getting a Devilhead. Very porn focused and very graphic.

The Angelhead votes have all disappeared. I added that to my Querey Bugs post.

Need a P5 ruling on a page I'm writing for an ecchi manga called How to Build a Dungeon: Book of the Demon King in English. Low Fantasy, Harem Genre, Plot With Porn comparable to Oglaf only less gross (lots of bare breasts and butts and explicit dialogue and poses, the genitals are left un-drawn).

Edited by StarSword on Sep 14th 2018 at 9:58:21 AM

The P5 doesn't generally pre-vet work pages.

It sounds like there's no reason for anyone to flag the work for review. You're acting in good faith, you're not planning to type the page up one-handed, so make away.

Well, I asked for pre-clearance on a page once before (The Translation in Blood). Generally I find it better to ask permission than forgiveness.

Page is up.

EDIT: And now it turns out there's an existing page for it as a light novel (under its Japanese title, which is why I didn't see it before). I'll just add crosslinks for the time being.

Edited by StarSword on Sep 14th 2018 at 12:37:21 PM

~StarSword

Standard procedure in this situation, assuming "How To Build A Dungeon Book Of The Demon King" is the official English title, is to move the content from the Japanese titled page to the English and swap out the crosswicks. So the way to go would be move everythign from LightNovel.Maou No Hajimekata and Manga.How To Build A Dungeon Book Of The Demon King to LightNovel.How To Build A Dungeon Book Of The Demon King

Pages moved and merged.

Gonna take a look at the Druuna comic.

How to Build a Dungeon is being sold by mainstream retailers and lacks any truly "explicit" detail. Does it have loli/shota stuff? If not, it should be completely safe.

Can the Eiken page be remade?

Not likely. It was cut for cause.

Yeah, the younger characters in that one pretty much ensure that it's not coming back, although having watched Bennett the Sage's review of it, I can't help but think that it's so over the top that it falls into Fan Disservice.

Edited by Willbyr on Oct 1st 2018 at 9:06:25 AM

I see no reason to revisit the decision on Eiken, even if it was made by fiat. There was a topic on it where we determined that, even if it doesn't technically violate the letter of our policy, it's so skeevy and inappropriate (never mind being very, very bad) that it's not worth reopening the discussion.

Actually, reading over the old discussion, if one of the P5 wants to reopen it, then I think we should let them. It seems that there was substantive debate over whether it qualified as pedo-pandering or not, and this was not during the P5's best days.

Edited by Ramidel on Oct 2nd 2018 at 3:21:41 AM

So far with Druuna. It's telling a story yes. It's interesting, I'll give it that, one of those pulpy sci fi bits. There's a lot of graphic content though. Reserving judgement until I see more.

Edited by DrPsyche on Oct 7th 2018 at 9:59:49 AM

EDIT: I meant to ask this on the content policy discussion page, so answer it there, not here.

Would Chiller be allowed under the content policy? It's an old Light Gun Game that's basically pure Torture Porn with the player as the torturer. I created a few red links to it, but later removed them because I'm not sure it's allowed.

Edited by rjd1922 on Oct 7th 2018 at 10:43:31 AM

There's a commented note at the top of School Days saying not to add tropes regarding Summer Days or Shiny Days due to site policy regarding underage content, but Shiny Days has a page. The Shiny Days page says underage sex scenes were removed from the English version, but JAST USA released a patch to uncensor the content, though Wikipedia makes no mention of such a patch.

I consulted someone on Discord over Baldr Sky being deleted and I got confirmation that it was false-flagged. The only two things that could constitute it being flagged are a "newborn" AI and a girl who looks a bit young but is otherwise just as old as everyone else. No sexual content apparently happens when the characters aren't adults.

Baldr Sky was cut in 2012 after discussion: see here.