The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".
This thread is for general discussion of pages.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM
Voted porn on Manga.Seikon No Qwaser. It might have passed on its own, but definitely not with the loli dominatrix.
Writing a post-post apocalypse LitRPG on RR. Also fanfic stuff.So that's... What, two devilheads, right? I've already sent the same links that Komodin got to tdgoodrich 1, so we should be expecting a third devilhead the next time he visits this site and checks the links to pass his final verdict.
... And color me surprised by the fact that there's no forum thread for Seikon No Qwaser. Guess that's one potential tasknote that effectively solved itself.
edited 9th Dec '13 5:47:18 PM by MarqFJA
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.For the censored version? Must be because of the breastfeeding-for-magical-power premise.
edited 10th Dec '13 6:46:38 AM by MarqFJA
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.Two sources I found for the broadcast version's rating, which is the censored version, listed it as "R+" for "mild nudity". The uncensored version broadcast was 17+.
...Granted, "R+" means that the censored version was only supposed to be viewable for either 15 year olds and up or 18 year olds and up.
We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)...and the discussion is now moot. Closed, disposition is to drag it behind the old barn.
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard CohenThere are three items still pending:
- Derpys Finest Hour: Two devilheads.
- Flexible Survival: No votes.
- Naruto Yaoinami Style: Two devilheads.
TV Tropes' very wikibot
A different question: I searched the image list for the title of a certain anime that sholdn't be named and found that there are still some dozen images around in the system.
Shouldn't we be consequent and delete them too?
Get rid of the walled gardenFirstly, it's hard to figure out the specifics or act on them if you don't mention any details.
Secondly, as Adannor said, are these images actually being used anywhere? The site probably has a fair number of images hosted but left unused for various reasons.
Thirdly, there has been at least one case where, following discussion in Image Pickin', a banned work has had its images used: refer to the source for Class Representative. (Unfortunately, I can't recall other examples off the top of my head.) Unless things have changed since then, I'm assuming that the current policy is to "keep unless better image found, do not link to source".
(As an addendum, this should only apply to worksafe images. NSFW or explicit stuff should probably go.)
edited 29th Dec '13 8:26:38 AM by Pyrite
Not a substitute for a formal medical consultation.Better question to be asked: Can we (or rather, the staff) even delete them from the database without having to go ask the server's operators to search and delete for specific images?
Is there a rule against providing the name of such images' source works somehow?
edited 29th Dec '13 8:25:20 AM by MarqFJA
Fiat iustitia, et pereat mundus.Images which are not linked anywhere will be purged every so often. I don't know how often that is.
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.![]()
Actually, that's a good question about the removal of uploaded images. I'm not familiar with the process at all. And for the purposes of evaluation, considering the number of "works that should not be named" which have already been named in this subforum, I think it should be okay.
Ah, thanks.
edited 29th Dec '13 8:31:39 AM by Pyrite
Not a substitute for a formal medical consultation.Pretty sure that even if nobody else, Eddie can delete them.
Other examples of images sourced from hentai are Absurdly Powerful Student Council, Chubby Chaser and Student Council President. The rule AFAIK is to tag them in comments.
edited 29th Dec '13 8:30:20 AM by Adannor
Folks, check the fourth entry in the "Special cases" note in the OP
. FELH 2, can you provide the information you found about these images? Considering how long it's been since some of the cuts, if those pics were orphaned, they should've been purged by now...I think that happens every 2-3 weeks.
edited 29th Dec '13 3:21:44 PM by Willbyr
I can pretend to be a little helper.
So, following my own check on this:
The images in question can be found by typing "kodomo" into the images list
search. They seem to almost all be images ripped from scanlations (many of them full pages). None of them seem to be NSFW in any way.
Site searching for a few of the image file names reveals no results, meaning it's likely none of them are posted. (Being scanlations, it's likely someone would have noticed.) I think they all had to be uploaded very recently. It's worth noting they were all uploaded by the same troper (I'm not saying his name publicly here, but you'll see it if you do the search itself).
In short, this is probably a "take no action, wait for the auto sweeper to clear them out" scenario. (If it doesn't do that, then we start looking into where the images are hidden.)
Expergiscēre cras, medior quam hodie. (Awaken tomorrow, better than today.)
Thanks for doing that. I looked up our former page for Kn J on Wayback and apparently most, if not all of those, were linked in the page before it was cut. I assume that this means that, for whatever reason, pics that were linked in a cut page don't get caught by the server's cleanup routine. I'll bring this to Eddie's attention.
edited 29th Dec '13 9:09:30 PM by Willbyr
We got a new flag: Tokimeki Check In. According to the reason for its flagging, it's "primarily a hentai game." Going by the somewhat risque page image, I'm inclined to believe that. Still, is anyone here familiar with this work?
By the way, the current dispositions still haven't changed since the last report by Septimus Heap.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.Hmmm. Cursory search of Wikipedia, Anime Characters Database and various (really old) reviews suggest that a.) it's quite obviously a H-game, b.) all characters with H-options are evidently at least in their later teens to early 20s, c.) it has nothing to do with Tokimeki Memorial, and d.) there isn't any all-ages version. It seems to have been a fairly run-of-the-mill 90s dating sim / H-game.
edited 7th Jan '14 5:53:40 AM by Pyrite
Not a substitute for a formal medical consultation.Woah, we actually have a page for that? That thing is old.
I actually did play that one a realllllly long time ago. As in, probably a decade ago. Lemme see, I think it basically amounts to some dude working at an inn because he has no other options, bunch of girls show up over time and he ends up boning one or more of them eventually. I uh guess I'd say it's probably on the borderline, but more porn than not. I don't recall anyone being physically underaged, but I do remember several girls that were clearly highschoolers back before that became the default setting. One acted younger than she looked.

On Parallel Porn Titles: I've looked through the page and didn't see any pornos linked. I've also added notes on the discussion page and in the page source. So unless there is something else to do there, it can be checked off as done here
.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman