The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".
This thread is for general discussion of pages.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM
Speaking as a mod, we would prefer that as well. However, if it is known or suspected that the admin would find something objectionable merely by looking at it, one has to question why we're interested in keeping it. Or at least, we need a fairly strong rationale to keep it.
edited 15th Sep '12 9:30:07 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Do you want me to bump up the priority now that I'm done watching Popotan? I was planning on looking at Salo next, but if we need a second opinion, I'm willing to oblige.
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard Cohen^When the administrator decided something over community opinion.
This forum is new. Hence, its history in the Welcomebot starts once you post in it after Welcomebot was hooked up here.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanAdmin fiat is when Eddie (or potentially a different admin) decides something unilaterally, e.g. to cut a work, sometimes without prior discussion. The welcome PM is because Arha was made Herald fairly recently and you haven't posted here since he was, despite being active before; I will no doubt receive it upon posting this.
That was the amazing part. Things just keep going.Well...for what it's worth, for a movie nicknamed "The Pigfucking Movie", there's...apparently not a lot of that going on, if the few brave souls who reviewed it have anything to say about it. If anything, it should be called "The Animal Cruelty Movie", since that's way more prominent.
...And I hope that's the last thing I need to say on it because dear god this movie sounds terrible. I don't even want to imagine how it looks.
edited 16th Sep '12 11:48:02 AM by Raidouthe21st
We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)
I must say that if this sex with the pig is in fact real, then one instance of Real Life animal cruelty is far, far worse than thousands of fictional cartoon children being abused.
Not to mention that in many western countries, it would fall under laws against bestiality and bestiality porn.
I don't think we would loose anything by cutting the page.
edited 16th Sep '12 12:21:33 PM by Catbert
@Catbert It's a live-action movie from the 1970's on a small budget.
A real pig was porked. And killed. Along with some piglets and chickens.
...I know how it sounds when I say that in comparison, the pig-screwing isn't bad. But in truth, there are worse things in this film then that, disgustingly enough.
...Not to say that sticking your dick in an animal isn't an act of animal cruelty, but still, hanging piglets...
edited 16th Sep '12 12:36:12 PM by Raidouthe21st
We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)Is anyone really titillated by it though? That doesn't sound like the intention. If it gets cut I am hardly going to shed a bitter tear over it, but I don't think we should let disgust with the work overtake the judgment process.
With that said, I really don't want to talk about this one anymore. Whatever the P5 decides is fine with me.
edited 16th Sep '12 12:38:41 PM by Arha
To the P5: To what extent do you look at the quality of non-porn content as a mitigating factor? I mean, we know that the quality of porn is irrelevant, but does the fact that The Pig-Fucking Movie has 90% shock and 10% porking make it any worse, for your purposes, than another movie that's 90% epic drama-comedy and 10% porking
edited 16th Sep '12 12:43:34 PM by Ramidel
Quality is irrelevant. If quality was relevant, we would have purged at least a good half of the stuff we reviewed from on high.
Oh, and no more "porking" puns, please.
edited 16th Sep '12 1:08:44 PM by tdgoodrich1
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard CohenHaving actually seen... this thing... I can say that the ratios are pretty right given above: 90% "What is going on?", 10% "OH GOD HE'S FUCKING A PIG". It's all unsimulated as well. I really HOPE it's not supposed to titillate; I'm pretty sure the whole thing is supposed to be an incomprehensible art film, but it doesn't stop it from being absolutely horrifying. Honestly, I would probably devilhead it just because the damn thing scarred me so much. The Mai-Chan shit we found on the site was less disturbing to me than this film.
Apparently a DVD release was attempted, and it had a commentary that might help enlighten us, but I'm sure we'd have about as much luck finding that commentary as we would have finding someone who admitted to enjoying the film enough to watch it twice for the commentary.
Zapped Headscratchers.Kingdom Hearts. Misclick, presumably.
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard CohenI'm going to have to say...keep on the pig movie. Disgusting exploitation film yes, porn/pedopandering no. Though it will need to stay very, very locked.
And could a mod post the content of the page? I'm on the fence on whether the examples should be cut.
Writing a post-post apocalypse LitRPG on RR. Also fanfic stuff.Watching now, should be able to vote by 10pm local time.
"Polite life will fill you full of cancer." - Iggy Pop "I've seen the future, brother, it is murder." -Leonard Cohen

I suspect that if somebody shows that to Eddie, he's going to cut it by admin fiat >.>