The sub-forum is used for discussions that adjudicate possible violations of The Content Policy. Threads here can be created by flagging a page through the sidebar "report" button and toggling "The page may violate the Content Policy".
This thread is for general discussion of pages.
Edited by SeptimusHeap on Sep 10th 2022 at 11:50:32 AM
I don't think is was discussed before.
It's like SHUFFLE! or School Days, which have been voted on. At most, we remove stuff on the original 18+ version of the visual novel.
Actually, Da Capo does have material worth noting. The VN has some pedo stuff, but it has clean adaptations that basically cut all that out. So far as I can recall there is no real gushing over it in the page. Also, I think everyone in the story is 14-15. Kinda on the young side, but it's a pretty fluffy story rather than being terribly sexual.
edited 30th Jun '12 11:10:39 AM by Arha
Well, if it has clean adaptations, then it's safe to keep, cover just those clean adaptations, and clean it free of lewd content, as far as I'm concerned.
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.The page seems to mostly be about the anime anyway.
Like I said, at most, we check to see if there's anything on the sex scenes from the original 18+ version and remove it. Which I don't think there is, so there's nothing to really do here.
edited 30th Jun '12 11:14:44 AM by KuroBaraHime
I'll stick it on my watchlist and keep an eye on it if it isn't there already. I think it is, though. Anyway, my recommendation is just to keep the page clean of any gushing which is really standard wiki policy.
So, angelhead it is... or should it just be zapped off the list?
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.I'd still vote on it since it was probably flagged intentionally in good faith. And like I said, it's similar to stuff like SHUFFLE! or School Days which you bothered to vote on.
Either way is fine. It really does have some content that would have been problematic if it didn't have cleaner adaptations or ports. On the other hand, with only three people around it'll just clutter up the list. So I'd only say zap it to keep the list shorter rather than because it's not worth reviewing. Actually voting on it is probably better since that way we can say 'Yes, we discussed the matter and found it acceptable.'
edited 30th Jun '12 11:28:09 AM by Arha
Ok, stuff we can easily clear off with only three people:
- Dragon Pink: It's porn. Nothing much to see.
- Zanjibaru: 30 pages of CGs of magical girls of atrocious tentacle rape, zombie rape, etc. It can probably go.
- Otoko no Ko wa Meido Fuku ga Osuki!?: Definitely not porn. Doesn't seem to be pandering to the wrong crowd, it's just really weird.
- Yomeiro Choice: Constant sexualised poses of little girls, plus is borderline hentai. The "plot" is an excuse for more sexual hijinks that never get explicit but are meant to be titillating. It can go.
edited 30th Jun '12 1:14:00 PM by lu127
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - FighteerI must say, I've always been disappointed that Da Capo has nothing to do with the Mafia.
What's precedent ever done for us?Da Capo is a musical term. Anyway enough about Da Capo, it's an obvious pass based on clean versions.
Yup. -___-
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer^^^*does the same*
>"red clam"
>Night Of The Living Plush
DAFUQ.
edited 30th Jun '12 12:14:31 PM by Adannor
Meh. While I've read it and didn't find it so bad, if just very cringe worthy...this is one thing I wouldn't be sad to see go.
...And for those who don't feel like reading it, well, this sums up Yomeiro Choice well enough, I guess.
edited 30th Jun '12 12:09:06 PM by Raidouthe21st
We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)Something called Samurai Fantasy has been flagged.
Well I flagged Samurai Fantasy, an abysmal yaoi cartoon. Most people don't exactly look it up for sex, but rather the bad animation and voices, to extremely absurd things like the bizarre sex.
It's so awful it feels like a parody of this stuff, but it's pornographic in nature.
"Pancakes. Oh, I blew it." - Joel Hodgson Nobody better lay a Butterfinger on my 3DS!Okay, having finally man'd up, I'm reading through Yomeiro Choice an-
I'm 20, and what isthis I dont even
edited 30th Jun '12 12:47:03 PM by Komodin
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.Why her labia? Why so detailed? That ruins the common gag when a girl falls down and YOU'RE WEARING LITTLE KID PANTIES. HAW HAW for me, FOREVER.
The Most Triumphant Example of Panty Shot? Plus Theiss Titillation Theory?
edited 30th Jun '12 12:52:07 PM by SeptimusHeap
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman...Meh.
...It is unusually detailed, I'll give it that.
...Still, only at chapter 3...
edited 30th Jun '12 12:53:58 PM by Raidouthe21st
We Are Our Avatars Forever (Now on Discord by invitation, PM)...
ಠ_ಠ
I would say that it was the pantyshot most blatantly made for titillation I have seen, but I would be lying. There is much, much worse. No, you don't want to know.
edited 30th Jun '12 12:57:48 PM by Sachiko
"Suffer a vicious person and you will fear vice. Suffer a virtuous one and you will soon loathe virtue itself." Tony Duvert
Hm, it doesn't seem all that prurient. Perhaps it's another misclick?
Experience has taught me to investigate anything that glows.