The Place for Purging Porn and Pedo-Pandering (AKA P5 flag evaluations)

VNDB has images hosted of Neko Kawaigari. Toggling the NSFW shows at least three underaged girls naked.

Zapped Nazo Unleashed. It was probably a misclick.

....I'm so squicked! How young? Like little kids, low teens, mid teens?

... Yep. Definite pedo-pandering all up in here. It's history... that is, unless someone can prove to me that, despite how they look, they're actually over 18.

edited 31st May '12 1:54:31 PM by Komodin

12 maybe? Too young for sex scenes.

I've heard of Neko Kawaigari before. It's apparently ridiculously sad and depressing.

Character wise, one looks like a Shana Clone, and could be seen as a young girl or a short, flat-chested adult depending on how you look at it. Her age is apparently never specified.

But definitely, the pink haired twins look like little girls and I think they actually are supposed to be, with no Older Than They Look. So yeah, probably cut-worthy.

edited 31st May '12 1:59:56 PM by KuroBaraHime

Kawiaigiri is probably the most straightforward case since MGQ (Yes, that will be my example from here on out of an easy case, All you have to do is go to their wiki and hit "Random page" at most 3 times to find pedoshit.)

Not to mention....... That OP. (Eyes start burning.)

I wont miss it if it gets cut. All you would need to do to find it anyhow is to dive into an image board which must not be named. According to its page/the youtube video, its memetic enough there that its still being spammed at everyone who looks.

edited 31st May '12 2:02:19 PM by Roraborialis

Re: Neko Kawaigari:

Yeah, that looks like beyond just "torch it". This is in the realm of "Purge from on high with divine flames." Pedo-pandering, plain and simple. Dubious thanks to Komodin for providing that link. I'm out one lunch, ya jerk.

edited 31st May '12 2:04:47 PM by tdgoodrich1

Even GIS *with* safe mode brought me to some highly questionable pictures... Kill It with Fire then.

So as soon as the rest of the P5 weigh in and devilhead this thing, we can move on.

Out of curiosity, why is it considered necessary to specify that a cut work is "furry porn" rather than just porn?

My guess is that it has little to do with whether or not the work is cut, and more to do with "I really wish I hadn't just read that."

That Neko thing...ugh. Devilhead.

In other news I gave Pink Flamingos the third angel.

self-thumped for whininess

edited 31st May '12 7:07:30 PM by InsanityPrelude

I saw Berserk mentioned in the post-perusal thread. Is it currently/going to be under review? It's one of the few works that I'm actually qualified to discuss — I've been keeping up with it pretty regularly.

edited 31st May '12 7:28:21 PM by CorrTerek

It was reviewed and voted to be kept.

Okay, never mind then!

I'm going to refrain from any further posts on this thread or its companion, the Page Restoration Petitions.

I feel my contributions are meaningless, I'm incensed at the accusations of being a troll when I have bent every effort to be as polite as possible to my peers, and I have lost all confidence in the direction the new guidelines have affected the contents of the wiki, not to mention I have lost all faith in the direction of this effort to the point I probably cannot post another argument for or against anything with an unclouded conscience, so I've decided to leave the forums peaceably and let the P5 do their jobs without having to suffer my further input.

Instead, I'm just going to leave the fate of contents of this website to the mercy of their judgment, and regardless of my feelings, I wish them well in their efforts and hope the end result of their labors is to the betterment of the site overall.

Just to confirm- we don't want examples from confirmed-not-coming-back (i.e. Kn J, Lotte, Ichinensei no Nachattara) works anymore, right?

Correct.

edited 31st May '12 8:05:52 PM by Shadis

If we see them used as examples, we delete and put why in the reason, yes? I'm not much of an editor.

I wonder if you realize the way you write. You may not mean it but that "pompous" style ("sir") made you sound like you're in a constant Sarcasm Mode - to my eyes at least - and this supposed parting message doesn't do you any favors.

Back in more relevant topics... I read some stories of Cybersix years ago and I do not remember anything objectionable by the guidelines. So José/Joseph was raped at some point? Apart from highly doubting it was shown in graphic detail or intended as titillating, the character in question is so vile and disgusting I think it was karma :p Will read the wiki pages calmly later.

edited 31st May '12 8:21:35 PM by GendoIkari

That's what I'm doing, anyway.

Edit: 51 wicks left for Kodomo no Jikan, not counting Pages Cut Under The Policy Change. I'll get back on this later.

edited 31st May '12 8:49:12 PM by InsanityPrelude

Ah...I write really strangely too, so it is awkward. I'm a native English speaker, but my writing comes out like this anyway.

It sounds like it was Played for Laughs, actually. I think a succubus creature is made by the Big Bad Von Richter to kill Cybersix, but is unable to and goes for Jose instead (he got better, I presume.)

Another recurring character is a teenager (around 16 or 17, I think) who has a crush on Adrian, Cybersix's male teacher disguise. The most explicit it gets is when she ambushes "him" topless.

I think there's nothing wrong with the comic myself, and I know the animated version is SFW. It's rather well written, and deals with dark themes like an abusive childhood, Nazis, and identity. But I haven't seen much of the comic other then the first five issues or so, so I don't know how risque it is.