ok
:(
I hope they're unbanned.
edited 18th Apr '12 5:56:21 PM by Bookyangel2438
Alt account of Angeldog 2437.I wouldn't care.
All the people I really wanna talk to I can contact via E-Mail or HH.
The 5 geek social fallacies. Know them well.^^ At this point, I don't think Ki TA would come back no matter what. My primary concern is for people who're still here, but who're under suspicion for whatever reason.
edited 18th Apr '12 5:58:02 PM by feotakahari
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something AwfulWell, Wikipedia has a page.
Hmmm....
Sounds like a pedophile Excuse Plot to me.
edited 18th Apr '12 6:11:35 PM by inane242
The 5 geek social fallacies. Know them well.Oh! That's the anime where the 10-year-old needs jizz to survive...
Still pretty bad.
Anyway, I feel that a work that portrays a child who literally needs the sexual contact of a man or a boy is creepy and sexist.
"Dr. Strangeloid, or How I Learned To Stop Worrying And Love The Cleanlink" - thespacephantom"Paedoshit" sounds immature and minimizes how disturbing this is.
The 5 geek social fallacies. Know them well.Like I keep saying, this isn't about the manga itself. It's been established that several people who actually read it don't think it's pedoshit, so whether it's ultimately judged to be pedoshit is only relevant to whether it should be allowed to have a page, not whether someone should be banned for saying it should have a page. (And again, it's not just about Ki TA.)
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something AwfulHow so?
The 5 geek social fallacies. Know them well.Sure.
Provided you scratch that.
edited 18th Apr '12 6:16:33 PM by inane242
The 5 geek social fallacies. Know them well.^^^ Because if several people who read it thought it wasn't pedoshit, then it occupies a gray area. Discussion of the gray area should not be a bannable offensive. (Ki TA wasn't the only person who argued against its removal—in fact, I can't think of anyone who'd actually read it and did argue for its removal.)
edited 18th Apr '12 6:16:39 PM by feotakahari
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful'k. So long as everyone is on page with that I am fine.
^^I refuse. So long as the repent and reform they are fine. As are all criminals. They may not be removed from prison, but they are not monsters.
edited 18th Apr '12 6:17:13 PM by Aondeug
If someone wants to accuse us of eating coconut shells, then that's their business. We know what we're doing. - Achaan ChahKOMODO NO JIKAN IS NOT A PEDOPHILIC WORK.
Now I've contested it, so it falls in a grey area.
Yeah, no.
The 5 geek social fallacies. Know them well.That doesn't specify them having acted yet, Loid. While I may not like their not repenting their feelings I cannot in all honesty say I would like a person jailed for their thoughts.
edited 18th Apr '12 6:18:36 PM by Aondeug
If someone wants to accuse us of eating coconut shells, then that's their business. We know what we're doing. - Achaan Chah^^ You're joking. Several people were not. (Actually, several people were not joking that KNJ is not pedophilic, so I also think people shouldn't be banned for arguing that it's not pedophilic—although the page can still be removed if the P5 ultimately decide that it's pedophilic after all.)
edited 18th Apr '12 6:18:40 PM by feotakahari
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something AwfulWell, I'm rather not ok with people who are completely ok with their desire to molest children.
P5?
edited 18th Apr '12 6:19:30 PM by inane242
The 5 geek social fallacies. Know them well.@Aon: Let's keep that particular derail out of this thread. (I have reasons to agree with you, but it'll only start a flame war and get this thread locked.)
^ The P5 is the group of people who're in charge of determining which works are pedophilic (though they'll open up topics to general discussion if they're unsure.)
edited 18th Apr '12 6:20:25 PM by feotakahari
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful

^ So how would you react if you were banned for something you weren't? (It doesn't have to be "a pedophile"—at this point, it could just as easily be "a goon.")
That's Feo . . . He's a disgusting, mysoginistic, paedophilic asshat who moonlights as a shitty writer—Something Awful