Oh, lookie here, a generic insult to religions. That ain't offensive at all, no siree.
And inaccurate in regards to the definition of a fairy tale.
What's the frequency Kenneth?|In case of war.Heh, I just figured out how to play the organ riff of that on the piano yesterday.
Insert witty and clever quip here. My page, as the database hates my handle.edited 12th Apr '12 1:27:40 AM by Carciofus
But they seem to know where they are going, the ones who walk away from Omelas.That's not even relevant anyway. It's an if-then statement. If heaven, would you? So that comment was totally uncalled for.
Now using Trivialis handle.Please, that is no insult to religion. Merely me stating my relevant beliefs.
Me being mean would be me declaring that heaven does not exist and you are stupid for believing in it. I really don't care one way or another if someone believes in an afterlife or not.
I don't want to see this get derailed into bashing religion either.
Through the eyes I have known you.![]()
The question is, provided that there is a heaven, what would you in response?
If you don't want to answer that properly, then you have no reason whatsoever to post in this topic.
Simple as that.
Now using Trivialis handle.Actually, logic says if X is false, both X -> Y and X -> notY are true. So it does work.
Now using Trivialis handle.Well, I mean it does work in the sense that it's mathematically logical (After all, if there's no heaven, the answer is simply "Nah, there's no logical reason for me to do this") but the question's purpose is clearly to posit an hypothetical scenario in which you could consider the possibility of both heaven and you getting into it. The purpose of the question simply can't be neglected, regardless of whatever bad wording the original post possesses.
"My life is my own" | If you want to contact me privately, please ask first on the forum.

This is supported by the fact that we now have numerous computers that theoretically have the computational power of a human brain, yet we are clearly nowhere close to having sentient machines. *
<><