Clearly not if half the posters in this thread disagree with it. Having no pic is obviously safer.
edited 25th Mar '12 12:52:08 PM by Firebert
Support Gravitaz on Kickstarter!I think pulling it is the bad precedent. What is wrong with it? Not graphic. Too suggestive? So? It's on a page about tentacle rape. Please be more specific.
edited 25th Mar '12 12:57:50 PM by rodneyAnonymous
Becky: Who are you? The Mysterious Stranger: An angel. Huck: What's your name? The Mysterious Stranger: Satan.
This post was thumped by the Codfish in a Derby Hat
![]()
Agree with 81. Pic can stay. Otherwise we would need to do a mass purge of page pics for a number of articles, as illustrated above. Also, the comic suggestion was really bad. It's as bad if not worse than the current one yet people seem to be okay with it due to some double standard that rape is okay when it's on a guy.
I think I have an idea for a nice compromise. How about a tentacle monster looking at a girl suggestively, without making physical contact? Kinda like what we have on Rape as Comedy.
At first I didn't realize I needed all this stuff...By all means, bring it forth. If you can find an actual image of it, I will probably prefer it. It's better if we are not borderline.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - FighteerThat sounds perfect. I mean, if it is a thing that is meant to be masturbated to, it should not be on a family-friendly site and is Not Safe For Work. You don't masturbate at your work computer or with your family. A monster just leering at a girl isn't bad at all.
edited 25th Mar '12 1:29:25 PM by TheDarkEricDraven
What you do on your work computer has nothing to do with TV Tropes. Even Wikipedia has such images and is not considered NSFW.
![]()
Good with me.
edited 25th Mar '12 1:34:48 PM by lu127
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer@89: That's a subversion, though.
If you want clear SFW levels, why not just go with Tentacle Grape
◊?
It's a funny subversion though, without entering any racy bits. I like it better than any other alternative so far.
"If you aren't him, then you apparently got your brain from the same discount retailer, so..." - Fighteer
You mean to say that you'd been fine even if said example was female? And that you feel that having the tentacles UNDER the clothes with direct skin-to-skin contact with implied non-consensual penetration in the text itself is somehow more work-friendly than what essentially amounts to a tentacle hitting Second Base over clothes?
In that case, I feel you've made an error in judgment.
edited 25th Mar '12 2:32:26 PM by peasant
The thing with #89 is that it's already on Aren't You Going to Ravish Me?
edited 25th Mar '12 2:30:09 PM by Feather7603
The Internet misuses, abuses, and overuses everything.


I'd be in favor of pulling the pic...it's not NSFW, but it's right on the edge and at least for this one, it's better to play it safe.