"Lusty" doesn't mean pervy, at least not primarily. It's more like "enthusiastic" or "in good shape".
Welcome To TV Tropes | How To Write An Example | Text Formatting Rules | List Of Shows That Need Summary | TV Tropes Forum | Know The StaffThe problem isn't how people feel about the things they're writing about but how they talk about it. No Lustfulness No Prudishness sounds too much like it's about the former.
We can mention things that turn people on. A person can mention something that turns them on. We just want people to stick to the facts when they do so.
The child is father to the man —OedipusActually, perhaps the message we should try to get across is that being a creep is no better than being a dick.
Welcome To TV Tropes | How To Write An Example | Text Formatting Rules | List Of Shows That Need Summary | TV Tropes Forum | Know The StaffMakes sense. So, "Don't be a creep"?. Is "creep" just as usable as "dick"?
ETA: Given the troubles with Fetish Fuel and Troper Tales, if your idea is to make "Don't be a creep" a rule with equal footing to "Don't be a dick", i.e Administrative Policy-level, be my guest.
edited 18th Mar '12 6:08:03 AM by SeptimusHeap
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman"Don't be a dick" is the super-rule of this site - see The Troping Code.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanTo prevent people from saying "but this is not what that rule means...", AKA Rules Lawyering. It's been discussed over and over. It's a super-rule, since everything else can be taken from it and there's no need to have additional ones then.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanRight. But Rules Lawyering works both ways. Sure, you prevent people from saying Aint No Law, but you also get the people who claim Oughta Be A Law claiming that there IS a law.
For example, the sudden declaration that memes must be X weeks old before inclusion on a YMMV page. It was posted on Mass Effect 3 as if it existed, but when I asked about it in the TRS thread, no one seems to know anything about any such rule.
In the end, you still end up having to make a rule one way or another.
That's what moderators and common sense are for - to read a rule in the specific case, just like judges in courts.
And that specific meme-rule seems to be made-up, but it's not really the topic of this thread - let's leave it in the TRS one.
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard Feynman+25 No Lewdness No Prudishness +21 No Perversity No Prudishness
edited 19th Mar '12 9:31:07 AM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. DickThat means we use one as the primary title and the other as a redirect. Simple.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"I know it's well under 2:1, but can Dont Be Creepy be a redirect? It's concise, and I've used it on at least two edit reasons I can recall.
The child is father to the man —OedipusShould we launch Dont Be Creepy into No Lewdness, No Prudishness now?
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanDone and indexed on Administrivia.
Did I miss something?
"For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled." - Richard FeynmanDo we need a redirect from Main?
Calling someone a pedant is an automatic Insult Backfire. Real pedants will be flattered.I'd say use No Lewdness or No Perversity as edit reasons rather than Dont Be Creepy. It kinda defeats the purpose of choosing a non-confrontational name if people are still using the name we rejected as too confrontational.
Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.

No Lustiness No Prudishness?
"You fail to grasp the basic principles of mad science. Common sense would be cheating." - Narbonic