![]()
We already had a rename-or-not crowner, there's no need to do that again.
Yeah, another trope name that reads like someone simply picked four words at random from a dictionary of legalese. Or worse, Simple English.
I mean, come on, Seeing Underpants was as clear, and at least it hinted at the reference. "Comedic Underwear Exposure" is a laconic, not a trope name.
Fanfic Recs orwellianretcon'd: cutlocked for committee or for Google?From a trope perspective there is no reason why it can't have examples. The problem is it could be confused for simply "the underpants of character X are shown". Anyone checked the examples previous to the kill sat for that?
Fanfic Recs orwellianretcon'd: cutlocked for committee or for Google?Yea, I was just joking that someone would think that Character A's boxers are shown after his belt is cut by character B and everyone laughs is too pervy.
Well, looks like Fast Eddie was the one who gave it an Example Sectionectomy. Come on, Eddie. Underwear exposure isn't that perverted. It's not like a Panty Shot. Really, I'm beginning to think we're taking this anti-lewdness thing too far. After all, it's called No Lewdness No Prudishness for a reason.
edited 22nd Apr '12 9:20:40 AM by MadMan400096
Catch me where? See my profile!Still, why would we get rid of a classic comedy trope? Like I said, it's not for Fanservice, so why the Example Sectionectomy?
Catch me where? See my profile!
It may seem like that on the surface, but when you dig deep enough (which isn't even that deep), it's just an innocent, non-perverted comedy trope.
And that's why one needs to read through the articles in full before making assumptions.
edited 26th Apr '12 6:07:11 PM by MadMan400096
Catch me where? See my profile!What is left to be done here?
Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.It isn't listed on Pages Cut Under The Policy Change, so it looks like the No Examples Please status of this page is outside the purview of the P5. As I understand it, only pages that were cut in the purge itself are eligible for appeal under that system, so if a TRS thread determines that examples can be restored here, we may or may not need to also get their approval.
Thanks to Dark Confident picking up the slack, the wicks have been moved.
Is there anything left to do here?
Waiting on a TRS slot? Finishing off one of these cleaning efforts will usually open one up.
Crown Description:
Vote up for yes, down for no.
