Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Per the site owner, AI generated images are allowed on TV Tropes and will be treated just like regular images.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by kory on May 2nd 2024 at 11:16:14 AM

GoofyLuffyMan I am actually a manatee from a Yellow Submarine (Newbie) Relationship Status: Having tea with Cthulhu
I am actually a manatee
#9576: Mar 13th 2024 at 12:37:21 PM

I don't think the image for Easily Impressed illustrates the trope well enough. It only really makes sense for One Piece fans like myself, since we know that it's a Quirky Work that takes place in a World of Weirdness where there are far more impressive things that happen then just that, hence why Luffy comes off as Easily Impressed rather than just "impressed", but people who haven't watched the series (or, at least, aren't that far into it) are seeing a guy being impressed by something that, while silly, genuinely is impressive to look at. I don't have any suggestions for replacement images, but if we do get a new image, we may have to make sure that it isn't too similar to Mundane Object Amazement.

Edited by GoofyLuffyMan on Mar 13th 2024 at 12:41:29 PM

Your existence is a Jojo reference.
TheImmortalAngelNewton The MILF Virus Since: Aug, 2015 Relationship Status: 700 wives and 300 concubines
The MILF Virus
#9577: Mar 13th 2024 at 4:44:39 PM

I'm sorry to bother, I'm new here so hope you can be understanding. I'm here to propose potential Magnificent Bastard images.

Golden Witch Beatrice: Umineko: When They Cry

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/screen_shot_2024_03_11_at_101949_pm.png

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/screen_shot_2022_11_01_at_112944_am.png

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/screen_shot_2024_03_10_at_93034_am.png

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/2_o_93.jpg

I asked around in MB, mainly yes except the fourth one, that was divisive.

Edited by TheImmortalAngelNewton on Mar 13th 2024 at 8:08:08 PM

"Are you the devil?" "Don't compare to me to those small fry" - Mir
LarryT I’ll take a potato chip… and EAT IT! from the Eldritch Ocean Abyss Since: Aug, 2023
I’ll take a potato chip… and EAT IT!
#9578: Mar 13th 2024 at 5:05:32 PM

I think number two works best for MagnificentBastard.Visual Novels

Edited by LarryT on Mar 13th 2024 at 5:06:27 AM

In honor of Akira Toriyama
mightymewtron Angry babby from New New York Since: Oct, 2012 Relationship Status: THIS CONCEPT OF 'WUV' CONFUSES AND INFURIATES US!
Angry babby
#9579: Mar 13th 2024 at 5:11:02 PM

Are you suggesting this for a subpage? The main page has a thread already. Either way, you have multiple images so you need to make an IP thread when a slot opens.

NVM thought this was Suggestions Thread

Edited by mightymewtron on Mar 13th 2024 at 8:11:24 AM

I do some cleanup and then I enjoy shows you probably think are cringe.
Twiddler (On A Trope Odyssey)
#9580: Mar 13th 2024 at 5:16:05 PM

[up][up][up] What page is this being suggested for?

If it's for an example page (e.g. MagnificentBastard.Visual Novels) you'll have to start a new thread, since you have multiple suggestions. Go to the bottom of the Image Pickin' forum and click "start a thread". If there are 60 threads, the forum is currently full and you'll have to wait until there's room.

If it's for ImageLinks.Magnificent Bastard, you can add the ones that got approval to Sandbox.Image Links Magnificent Bastard and ask here for that page to be swapped in to ImageLinks.Magnificent Bastard.

rjd1922 he/him | Image Pickin' regular from the United States Since: May, 2013 Relationship Status: Love is for the living, Sal
he/him | Image Pickin' regular
#9581: Mar 13th 2024 at 9:58:13 PM

Asking again because nobody responded before and I don't want to open a thread just for one image on a Characters/ subpage: Morpho Knight's image on Characters.Kirby Recurring Bosses is his model from Kirby Star Allies, which looks like a T-pose.

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ksa_morpho_knight_model.png

May I replace it with his Gotcha Figurine from Kirby and the Forgotten Land?

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/morpho_knight_gotcha.png

Keet cleanup
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#9582: Mar 13th 2024 at 10:26:47 PM

[up] Probably best to thread it. I don't see an issue with the current.


Lifehack for when Upload Image isn't loading, go to F12 dev tools, Network, find imguploader.js (click Upload Image again if needed), copy the block with "Dropzone.options.myAwesomeDropzone =", go to Console, and paste it entirely. When you click Upload Image again it should be working.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
loserswithwifi Loserswithwifi from UK (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded)
Loserswithwifi
#9583: Mar 14th 2024 at 4:08:01 PM

When is a thread considered “done”? The thread I made is in pretty much unanimous favour of one image with six votes and hasn’t had any new replies in two days, but I’m not sure if six votes is enough.

Related question: are you allowed to bump threads in IP?

Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#9584: Mar 14th 2024 at 4:16:16 PM

It depends. In that thread, 1.2 has six votes but five of them were before an alternative suggestion was proposed. There needs to be allowance for that.

Bullman "Cool. Coolcoolcool." Since: Jun, 2018 Relationship Status: Longing for my OTP
"Cool. Coolcoolcool."
#9585: Mar 14th 2024 at 5:31:35 PM

According to the Image Source page ArchEnemy.Western Animation is fan art. I looked at the thread that selected it but I could not find any mention of permission. I couldn't find the original source. Should I start a thread for it?

Edited by Bullman on Mar 14th 2024 at 7:31:56 AM

Fan-Preferred Couple cleanup thread
ElioHerondale Bette Kane officionado from In the JayRoy trenc Since: Jan, 2023 Relationship Status: She does the things you do, but she is an IBM
Bette Kane officionado
#9586: Mar 15th 2024 at 12:22:45 AM

uhhh, where do you go if you want to change the image of a work that already has an image on it? I wanna change the image on Series.Kamen Rider Gaim from it's blu-ray collection 1 image to it's series poster.

Teen Titans: Original Teen Titans | Batgirl Bette Kane | Teen Titans
Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#9587: Mar 15th 2024 at 12:35:37 AM

[up] At the bottom of the Forum list see "start thread". It's preoccupied now, so you'll have to wait or help with voting on other image picks.

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#9588: Mar 15th 2024 at 5:58:09 AM

[up][up][up]Per Saucenao, the source appears to be this. The artist, Dan Khanna, seems to have illustrated plenty for Transformers in an official capacity. I don't know if that means this art was ever used as such.

Edited by Synchronicity on Mar 15th 2024 at 11:27:02 AM

GoodOlGranite Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer from Wales Since: Jun, 2023
Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer
#9589: Mar 15th 2024 at 8:10:34 AM

For the past few days, I was thinking of creating a thread regarding a Nightmare Fuel page which I feel needed to have its image replaced. However, while doing some preparation work for it a few minutes ago, I checked the page history and found that the current image was previously kept through a thread/crowner around two years ago. I haven't looked at this crowner (as of writing, will likely do so in a moment), but my one involved the reasoning that the current image is a bit spoilery and I have a feeling that said reasoning was likely involved in that original thread too. Would it be alright if I put forward this new thread, on the off-chance that opinions have changed, or should I just leave it?

Edited by GoodOlGranite on Mar 15th 2024 at 3:12:03 PM

Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#9590: Mar 15th 2024 at 8:37:56 AM

It would help to know what page/thread/crowner you're talking about, but personally, I think "a bit spoilery" is a really nebulous reason to pull an image. Spoilers in general are hard to gauge (e.g. a murder that takes place in episode 2/8 might be shocking in the moment, but "not a big deal" in the big scheme of things, or something that's spoilery in context isn't visually so), so in cases like these I'd prefer to have (1) a really good case for why the image should not be on the page, understandable to non-fans (2) a good replacement suggestion that is unambiguously not a spoiler.

Edited by Synchronicity on Mar 15th 2024 at 11:48:50 AM

GoodOlGranite Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer from Wales Since: Jun, 2023
Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer
#9591: Mar 15th 2024 at 8:43:05 AM

For the record, I was talking about NightmareFuel.Turning Red. I think I actually saw your name on the edit which added the standard "image has been retained" disclaimer. I will also admit that "a bit spoilery" was a bit of an understatement on my part. I do already have a draft as a text file and I do say the image is a major spoiler in that.

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#9592: Mar 15th 2024 at 8:46:15 AM

Eh, if you haven't seen the movie, you don't know who that is. Could be Mei herself for all you know.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
GoodOlGranite Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer from Wales Since: Jun, 2023
Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer
#9593: Mar 15th 2024 at 8:49:41 AM

I see your point, but the fact that there is a massive red panda, one that's clearly bigger than Mei's Red Panda form is depicted in trailers and other promotional material, at all would still be a spoiler (at least in my opinion).

Edited by GoodOlGranite on Mar 15th 2024 at 3:52:09 PM

WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#9594: Mar 15th 2024 at 8:51:46 AM

I disagree. The important context is who the panda is and what's she doing. The mere existence of this character wouldn't ruin the movie, because it's not a twist in and of itself. I'm pretty sure I saw that image get chosen before ever watching the movie, and it didn't ruin anything.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
GoodOlGranite Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer from Wales Since: Jun, 2023
Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer
#9595: Mar 15th 2024 at 8:56:23 AM

Taking your words into account, I think I understand. While I do still think it is somewhat spoilery, I feel now that what you've brought up about it not being clear who it is in the image itself does make it less of a problem. Their identity could still be deduced based on the image quote, but you'd only see that quote if you were on the page itself.

Edit: Looking at the page history, the image was added on the 13th of March 2022, two days after release.

Edited by GoodOlGranite on Mar 15th 2024 at 3:59:44 PM

Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#9596: Mar 15th 2024 at 8:58:11 AM

Or the caption can just be removed ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

GoodOlGranite Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer from Wales Since: Jun, 2023
Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer
#9597: Mar 15th 2024 at 9:02:05 AM

Actually, now that you say it, that's honestly a relatively sensible solution to the issue. Then again, I'm sure that most people who go on the moments subpages would be those who have already watched the movie (with a few exceptions, naturally). In the end, it depends on what people think. As for my opinion, I'll be neutral in thinking that keeping the caption and removing the caption are both viable options.

Edited by GoodOlGranite on Mar 15th 2024 at 4:06:11 PM

Lymantria Tyrannoraptoran Reptiliomorph from Toronto Since: Apr, 2015 Relationship Status: Historians will say we were good friends.
Tyrannoraptoran Reptiliomorph
#9598: Mar 15th 2024 at 9:09:16 AM

While NF pages are Spoilers Off, that doesn’t mean the first thing you see upon opening the page needs to be a spoiler. I suppose removing the caption could work. (And yes, I’ve seen the movie.)

Edited by Lymantria on Mar 15th 2024 at 12:10:03 PM

Join the Five-Man Band cleanup project!
WarJay77 Big Catch, Sparkle Edition (Troper Knight)
Big Catch, Sparkle Edition
#9599: Mar 15th 2024 at 9:13:24 AM

I guess I should acknowledge that, to me, "spoiler" images always seem like a strange thing to focus on. I've been spoiled far more by people informing me that an image contains a spoiler, than by looking at images themselves sans context. This is because, if you don't already know the work, you have no context for what's a spoiler or not.

Currently Working On: Incorruptible Pure Pureness
GoodOlGranite Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer from Wales Since: Jun, 2023
Average Mutant Mayhem & Turning Red Enjoyer
#9600: Mar 15th 2024 at 9:13:30 AM

Just figured that it would make sense for me to say that I've also seen the movie. I put it off for a long while but I saw it last month when they finally gave it a proper cinema release. It was really good, ended up seeing it in the cinema three times.


Total posts: 9,741
Top