Follow TV Tropes

Following

IP discussion: thread reasons, policies, other stuff

Go To

In an effort to keep the volume of threads in IP at a reasonable level, and to encourage creating threads that address genuine problems, we need to make some notes about when to request a thread and what constitutes valid reasons for a thread. These have been mentioned in some of the other IP procedure threads, but they're being listed here for quick reference.

    open/close all folders 

    Screening of new threads 
  • New IP threads don't require approval by the staff to be opened. Still, the staff can and will lock threads with improper reasoning and warn the troper if needed. Please take time to review the guidelines below and make sure your request is solid before submitting it.
  • A thread started within two weeks of the closing of a previous thread on the same page that doesn't have a concrete suggestion will be summarily closed.

    General notes 
  • Also refer to: About Images and Copyright, How to Pick a Good Image, and Images On Wiki Pages.
  • Going through IP for a page that doesn't have an image or an IP tag isn't obligatory, but it is strongly recommended. Otherwise, the image you put up may end up coming to the forum for work or replacement.
  • Pages that have gone through IP should have a commented-out tag showing the relevant thread(s) and any related information. Always check for these before adding a pic or requesting an IP thread for a page. If a page does have a tag, please note its information when you start a thread.
  • It's recommended to discuss image concerns and thread reasons in the threads that are pinned at the top of the forum before starting a new thread. They may be able to address the issue(s) without needing to start a dedicated thread.
  • Keep the quality criteria listed below in mind when making an image suggestion.
  • Work pages that don't have an image generally don't require an IP thread to upload one, but feel free to start a thread if you have multiple ideas.
  • Animated GIFs can't be uploaded as page pics, so don't bother trying. (The pic on Creepy Changing Painting is a bit of HTML magic and not a true GIF, in case you're wondering.)
  • In threads for specific pages, you may see people casting votes by referring to a post number and (if applicable) the number of the image in a given post. For example, "2" would refer to "the image in the second post", and "3.2" would refer to "the second image in post 3".
  • We try to operate on "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" mentality, and we try not to change an image just for the sake of changing it. In reference to this, someone might call a suggestion a "lateral move". If the image on the page is not otherwise problematic, consider if your suggestion is a clear improvement before pitching it.
  • It usually takes 5-7 [tup] votes for a pic to be considered to have consensus in a thread; pics can be put up with less than this, but usually only at a moderator's discretion.
    In crowners:
    • An option has consensus if it has a minimum of a 2:1 vote ratio.
    • If a crowner ends with no options having consensus, the crowner and thread are considered to be failed and the thread will be closed unless there is significant ongoing discussion.
    • Crowners normally run for 5 days, but can go longer if more time is needed, and can be closed early for the following criteria:
      • At any point, if the leading option has a vote balance of 10 or more and no other options have consensus. This is considered "super-consensus".
      • After 3 days, if the leading option has a vote balance of at least 8 and no other options have consensus.
      • After 4 days, if the leading option is the only one that has consensus.
    • Crowners can only be made by moderators and engineers, usually after discussion has stalled for a few days. Crowners can be requested by regular users by compiling and linking options in a post and hollering for it to be made into a crowner.
    • Non-moderators can add crowner options to an ongoing crowner, but cannot edit options they didn't add, nor can they call or lock a crowner. If you add an entry to an ongoing crowner, please note this in the thread.

    IP thread reasons 

High-priority image issues

  • A pic has been changed or removed from a page for a reason that may not be valid, or no reason at all, especially if the pic was chosen by a previous IP thread. These changes can sometimes be simply reverted by a moderator without a need for further discussion.
  • Not Safe For Work (NSFW)
    • If you're unsure on whether a pic fits this or not, bring it up in the IP Discussion thread.
    • Classic works of art containing nudity, such as Michelangelo's David or Botticelli's The Birth of Venus, don't necessarily fall into this, but appropriateness for the page in question is the key factor, and SFW options should be considered whenever possible.
  • The image is a spoiler. The age and/or infamy of the work the image originates from may prevent this from being considered a valid issue.
  • Watermarking. A TV channel emblem on a screencap is a "bug", not a true watermark, and is permissible as long as it's not obtrusive.
  • Meme-based images are not permitted as page pics. The sole general exceptions are Image Macro (for obvious reasons) and a work's Memes page, where they should only be considered if there are no better options.Other exceptions 
  • A page has an image that is obviously from the wrong work / programming block / network / etc.
  • Copyright issues:
    • The pic implies TV Tropes is claiming the copyright.
    • The pic has been taken from a site that deals in copyrighted images or videos, especially if a watermark has been removed and/or the site is selling their content. Screencaps from videos from these sites are not permitted, either.
    • The image is the entirety of a product for sale, such as a t-shirt design.
    • Images from illegally obtained materials, such as leaks or camrips, are not allowed.
    • Using an entire work:
      • Basically, if it's copyrighted, we have to get permission to use it. This covers single-panel cartoons, photographs, entire comic strips and webcomics, and similar works. If permission is granted to use a work, it's always noted on the page in some fashion, usually in the caption and/or with the page tag. If an artist requests a specific way to display their connection to the pic, we'll do our best to honor it.
      • The creators of xkcd and Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal have given us carte blanche to use entire works as needed. Permission notices for such cases aren't required.
      • Entire cards from card-based games like Magic: The Gathering are impractical but can be used. Using the art from these cards is fine.
      • Any such work that's in the public domain is free to use.
    • Some creators do not want their work used outside their control at all, but fair use means that we are not legally bound to honor this for the wiki's purposes, aside from the aforementioned restrictions. We'll honor a take-down request, but it's up to them to send it. We're not obliged to chase them down and ask them what their policy is. Fair use also allows us to use excerpts of works without seeking permission. In this case, the minimum needed to get the trope across should be used.
    • Due to its dubious legality in regards of copyright, AI-generated artwork will not be allowed as options in IP discussions. See this Wiki Talk thread for reference on the decision.

General reasons

  • Multiple suggestions for a page without a pic. Single suggestions are currently being filtered through the Image Suggestion thread instead of getting their own threads right off the bat.
  • The current pic doesn't adequately demonstrate the trope. Examples of this include:
    • Just a Face and a Caption (JAFAAC)—the pic shows an example of the trope but relies on familiarity with its subject(s) to make the connection to the trope evident.
    • A pic that is nothing but text, or one where the text overwhelms the imagery. "May/Might as well be a page quote" is often used to describe this. There are exceptions (Spoof Aesop, for example), especially for dialogue-based tropes, but generally we want to have actual images as page pics with just enough text to support the expression of the trope.
  • Poor image quality. Graininess, motion blur, and compression artifacts are three of the most common problems. Before starting a thread for this reason, see if the Quality Upgrade thread can help find or create a nicer version of the image. Replacing images with a better-quality version is a free action, i.e. can be done without starting a thread.
If the size value in a pic's coding is larger than the actual size of the pic, it will stretch the pic to that width which will introduce artifacts. Check the image's properties before starting a thread; if this is the issue, a change to the coding will fix it.
The age of some works may make getting a truly high-quality image from them difficult. This will be taken into consideration when deciding on a pic.
  • The current pic is taken from a multi-panel work such as a comic strip or webcomic and uses more than half of the source material.
  • Fan-art on a work page instead of an image from the work itself.
  • The current pic is overly fanservicey, especially in the Creator/ namespace. In the case of Fanservice tropes, pics should be as low-key as possible while still getting the trope across.
  • Two trope pages have the same pic.
    • While it's preferred that they be separate, a trope page can have the same image as a work page or a character image from a Characters subpage. In these cases, a thread should have at least one replacement suggestion for either page.
    • Similarly, graphics can generally be reused among a work's subpages. Threads that address these will still be accepted, but should also have at least one replacement suggestion.
  • You believe you have a suggestion that better illustrates the trope than the current pic (by Image Pickin' standards, not "This is a cooler pic.")
  • A page marked as No Real Life Examples, Please! has a Real Life pic.Exceptions 
  • A YMMV or Audience Reaction page has a pic that is not In-Universe.Exceptions 
  • A page has an unusual image arrangement not chosen by an IP thread and you don't think it works well, e.g. having two images on a trope page or an image that's a janky collage. Some pages may have multiple pics for a reason, so check for an IP tag before starting a thread in this case.

Invalid reasons

  • Trying to solicit ideas for an image. IP has a cap of 60 threads and is usually at or near capacity on any given day, so space can't be allotted for threads whose only purpose is to brainstorm.
  • Not liking an image's art style, layout/design, or any Photoshopping or similar alterations that may have been made, provided they don't impact the pic's quality.
  • Claiming that a particular work is over-/under-represented. This can have some impact on deciding on a pic, but should never be the main gist of a thread.
  • Trying to argue that a pic you liked wasn't chosen in a previous thread, especially if it lost in a crowner, or trying to make an invalid argument that a pic doesn't work for a page even though it was chosen by a thread. Repeatedly doing this is considered griefing and is grounds for suspension from the workshop forums.
  • Some trope pages feature Visual Puns or other jokey pics rather than something that actually demonstrates the trope, usually because these pages have been very hard to find a better pic for.Example  Don't request a thread just because you don't like the joke; if you've got an actual example, that's fine. Also, see the "Don't change the pic" section on the page mentioned below.

    Special cases 
For a list of pages that have unique statuses, see Image Pickin' Special Cases

General cases:

  • Pages within the FanficRecs/, Fridge/, Haiku/, Headscratchers/, ImageLinks/, Laconic/, PlayingWith/, Quotes/, Trivia/, WMG/, and YMMV/ namespaces and disambiguations default to no pic; YMMV.Home Page and Headscratchers.Home Page are the only exceptions. Pages in the Analysis/ namespace default to BUPKIS status (meaning they won't have a pic unless a really good one is found; see Image Pickin' Special Cases for more details)
  • Due to their exceptional subjectivity and persistent problems with images being poor quality and/or not illustrative, Moments pages (Awesome/, Funny/, Heartwarming/, NightmareFuel/, Shocking/, TearJerker/) are limited to one image.
  • Pages for unreleased works shall keep the first image that is uploaded to the page when it's created, with further pre-release images relegated to an Image Links page. Once the work is released, a thread may be created to decide which image is to be officially used on the page. See this Wiki Talk thread for details. Note that the first image may still be removed if it falls afoul of any of the aforementioned guidelines.

    Image Pickin' flowchart 

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/ip_flowchartdrawio_8_transformed.png

Text version:

Is the page on Image Pickin' Special Cases?

  • If yes, start a thread.
  • If no, does it already have an image?

Edited by Willbyr on Jan 20th 2024 at 9:11:31 AM

NitroIndigo ♀ | Small ripples lead to big waves from West Midlands region, England Since: Jun, 2021 Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
♀ | Small ripples lead to big waves
#8776: Jun 21st 2023 at 12:11:59 PM

Recap.Thomas And Friends S 1 E 20 Whistles And Sneezes has two images, one for each chapter it's based on. Problem is, other episodes of this show that were adapted from multiple chapters/stories don't have this, and I've never seen any other Recap/ pages with two non-labelnoted images. Should I start a thread to decide which one gets to stay, or...?

Edited by NitroIndigo on Jun 21st 2023 at 8:12:16 PM

Mrph1 he/him from Mercia (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies
he/him
#8777: Jun 21st 2023 at 1:00:22 PM

[up] On a similar note...

Silver Surfer has two images from different runs of the comic. The art style varies, but the Surfer himself hasn't changed much, so I'm not sure it justifies them. Do we keep both, or start a thread?

Synchronicity (4 Score & 7 Years Ago)
#8778: Jun 21st 2023 at 1:24:28 PM

[up][up]That should be threaded. [up] honestly seems hard splittable.

Mrph1 he/him from Mercia (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies
he/him
#8779: Jun 21st 2023 at 1:27:37 PM

[up] I'd been thinking about a split at some point, so might just accelerate that.

Mrph1 he/him from Mercia (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies
he/him
#8780: Jun 23rd 2023 at 10:25:33 AM

General question, but with a couple of specific pages in mind -

How do we approach a split when the current page has an image that's not obviously suitable for any of the newly split pages?

Case in point: The Quest for Karla covers all three books in a trilogy. The image is the cover of an omnibus containing the whole trilogy, with all of the titles (plus the omnibus title) prominent.

So... if split into three book-specific pages, does it come back via Image Pickin' for one or all of the new pages (ideally on a single thread?) to endorse the removal of the current image and addition of new ones to the new pages?

Or do we take the view that if the current image is not applicable to the new pages the usual "first image is free" new page rules will apply?

(I'm personally leaning toward the former, but wanted to double-check)

Amonimus the Retromancer from <<|Wiki Talk|>> (Sergeant) Relationship Status: In another castle
the Retromancer
#8781: Jun 23rd 2023 at 10:30:43 AM

If new pages are made, images should be free game (And The Quest for Karla would be probably fine as an overarching anthology page).

TroperWall / WikiMagic Cleanup
Mrph1 he/him from Mercia (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies
he/him
#8782: Jun 24th 2023 at 2:19:13 AM

[up][tup] Works for me. I've seen a few splits that seemed like excuses to unilaterally change images, so wanted to double check.


On a related note - Characters.The Quest For Karla was recently created to accompany the Literature page. Images are taken from the adaptations, which have their own Series and Film pages (Series.Smileys People, Series.Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy, Film.Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy) but don't currently have their own character pages.

Characters who appear in both the film and the series have been given two images, one photo for each actor/adaptation.

Should we be using adaptation images for this? And, if so, does it really justify one from each adaptation? Or is it time to start a thread?

Edited by Mrph1 on Jun 24th 2023 at 10:19:39 AM

MaeBea from Satan's basement Since: Jul, 2021 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
#8783: Jun 24th 2023 at 7:57:50 PM

The image on NightmareFuel.Spookys Jump Scare Mansion potholes to Eye Scream. That's the only time I've seen a pothole like that, should it be doing that? Or should the pothole be removed or possibly moved to the caption> It feels a bit close to Don't Explain the Joke for me.

"Squid has to go to market. He's had to go to market for as long as he's sucked water."
PurpleEyedGuma Since: Apr, 2020
#8784: Jun 24th 2023 at 8:12:05 PM

[up] I just removed it for the time being.

StarManatee Who up whereing they else? from The house in the ocean Since: Jun, 2023 Relationship Status: Oh my word! I'm gay!
Who up whereing they else?
#8785: Jun 25th 2023 at 6:50:07 AM

EldritchAbomination.SCPFoundation’s page image doesn’t look very eldritch out of context. I have several suggestions but they’re all art, however I know the artists for them and can easily ask said artists for permission. Should I make a thread?

He/Him | Elsewhere (2017)
PurpleEyedGuma Since: Apr, 2020
#8786: Jun 26th 2023 at 9:26:14 AM

The newest trope Creepy Asymmetry technically has an image, but it got pushback in the draft, and the sponsor commented it out instead of just removing it.

Mrph1 he/him from Mercia (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies
he/him
#8787: Jun 26th 2023 at 9:31:08 AM

[up] I know pre-commented examples are prohibited, shouldn't the same rule apply to imagery?

MacronNotes (she/her) (Captain) Relationship Status: Less than three
(she/her)
#8788: Jun 26th 2023 at 9:55:25 AM

I think it's best to start a thread on it. Interestingly, enough the image still shows up on the homepage despite being commented out so that's going to cause confusion.

Macron's notes
themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
#8789: Jun 26th 2023 at 9:56:17 AM

Is it explicitly not allowed to just comment out the image? If so, should I PM Ikea Han (the sponsor) to let them know?

TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
MacronNotes (she/her) (Captain) Relationship Status: Less than three
(she/her)
#8790: Jun 26th 2023 at 10:02:06 AM

I don't know if it's outright forbidden but I can't see being good editing practice if there was consensus to comment the image beforehand. The user should have made a thread instead or just removed the image before launch.

A ping or a PM to Ikea Han works fine.

Macron's notes
themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him
#8791: Jun 26th 2023 at 10:03:44 AM

I'll ping them.

~Ikea Han Per the above discussion, please do not comment out images prior to launch—if there are image issues, as Macron said above start an IP thread.

TRS Queue | Works That Require Cleanup of Complaining | Troper Wall
IkeaHan Franchouchou Sponsor from Kamurocho, Tokyo Since: May, 2021 Relationship Status: [TOP SECRET]
Franchouchou Sponsor
#8792: Jun 26th 2023 at 11:30:07 AM

Fair enough. I'll just remove it in that case and open a thread.

Character Specific Page cleanup
Mrph1 he/him from Mercia (4 Score & 7 Years Ago) Relationship Status: Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies
he/him
#8793: Jun 26th 2023 at 11:34:41 AM


This post was thumped by the Shillelagh of Whackingness

PurpleEyedGuma Since: Apr, 2020
FernandoLemon Nobody Here from Argentina (Troper Knight) Relationship Status: In season
PurpleEyedGuma Since: Apr, 2020
#8796: Jun 26th 2023 at 4:20:17 PM

[up] They’re not.

EDIT: Started the thread.

Edited by PurpleEyedGuma on Jun 26th 2023 at 7:22:07 AM

ANonagon9 (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Complex: I'm real, they are imaginary
#8797: Jun 29th 2023 at 1:44:03 PM

Should we make a dedicated sandbox for items that need space freed up (e.g. want to replace an image but already 60 threads) or is just holding them here fine?

MacronNotes (she/her) (Captain) Relationship Status: Less than three
(she/her)
#8798: Jun 29th 2023 at 1:45:44 PM

I think people can either do that on a personal sandbox or offsite.

EDIT: We had a sandbox page for tropes that might need IP but the name escapes me. We cleared it out and cut it last year because we didn't think it was needed and IP usually doesn't stay backlogged for days like TRS because the workload is less extensive.

Edited by MacronNotes on Jun 29th 2023 at 5:16:34 AM

Macron's notes
themayorofsimpleton Now a lurker. Thanks for everything. | he/him from Elsewhere (Experienced, Not Yet Jaded) Relationship Status: Abstaining
MissConduct Chew. from Duwang (Rule of Seven) Relationship Status: I get a feeling so complicated...
Chew.
#8800: Jun 29th 2023 at 8:30:09 PM

[up]I will say I think that keeping a permanent sandbox isn't the worst idea. Just as an option, so people won't forget a trope they wanted to bring up when the forum has 60 threads.

So I have a suggestion for a BUPKIS page, namely Horrible.Live Action TV. It's the advertisement from The Secret Diary of Desmond Pfeiffer that references its overwhelmingly negative reviews (and used to be the series' page image until it was replaced by something actually from the show):

https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/images/the_secret_diary_of_desmond_pfeiffer_ad_6303.jpg

It's very blunt about the quality of the show, Pfeiffer is already on the page, and, of course, "Critics hate it" is true of every show on that page. But of course it like all Horrible subpages is BUPKIS, and while I think this is a pretty alright suggestion I just wanted to see if I needed to get permission before posting a thread for it.

Koichi really steals? No dignity.

Total posts: 9,727
Top