It's been on the request list for longer than many people have been tropers. It is also one of the more difficult pieces of tech to code from scratch in a system not designed for it from the getgo. Patience, young padawan.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Buh.
<insert sound of jaw hitting floor>
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Here's your coupon, Fighteer. Redeemable for one flying pig.
Apparently I am adorable, but my GF is my #1 Groupie. (Avatar by Dreki-K)Here's what the new history will be like: https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/mods.php?id=21
There will be a list of all the available versions in the upper left corner. When you need to do a revert, you select the version you want, review to make sure, then press the button at the bottom.
This will display differences as small as one character changed.
edited 20th Aug '11 5:11:20 AM by FastEddie
Goal: Clear, Concise and WittyWait, are we going to have highlighted differences finally, too? *gleeful look*
...I may need to keep and use that coupon myself.
Apparently I am adorable, but my GF is my #1 Groupie. (Avatar by Dreki-K)Pretty. Mods only, I hope? Or are we going to have edit-reversion wars as well as normal edit wars?
edited 19th Aug '11 8:25:46 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Hm, that reminds me. On that By the Power of Grayskull! coding, it's okay to remove the curly brackets and Wiki Word it right? I hate when people do that, it makes it a bitch to ctrl+f.
Fight smart, not fair.The new version controller will be for everybody who is known. There may be version-wars, but it will be much simpler to reverse damages than it is with the present system. We'll still have visibility of version changes on the Recent Changes page and personal watchlists.
Yes, removing superfluous curly-brackets is a cool edit.
Goal: Clear, Concise and WittyWell I could see someone trolling the TRS or Natter Alert thread and revert those changes as it comes off. A Mod or Curator could have a lock button that removes said revert option for their edits?
A Revert for large old edits like at one time someone blanked the page so someone restored it, Then someone months later presses that revert button to restore the page to the way it was months before (But not blanked). So maybe set a time limit of a day or two? or only like 3 edits back?
edited 20th Aug '11 5:44:35 AM by Raso
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!
The limit on number of times backs makes it pretty useless as we've often had trolls make a number of edits to a page chopping it into piece meal and I can see them doing that if they realise we can only turn it back so many things.
I think the ability to lock it from being reverted to that point would just take care of that better and with less chance for them to abuse it.
edited 20th Aug '11 8:17:53 AM by shimaspawn
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick![]()
A Date lock however would still be a good idea for general tropers. Like a week or so.
Most people wouldn't notice a page that was reverted like say 6 months ago unless they added an entry themselves and it disappeared.
However a history lock after a major page change requiring say a mod to lock the changes could work too. (although more work for the mods.)
Sparkling and glittering! Jan-Ken-Pon!Time limit could be awkward; sometimes vandalism isn't discovered right away. I once had a case of bowdlerizing that was a week old by the time I came across it, and hadn't been fixed yet.
Limiting how far back an edit you can revert should work, though.
Hrm. I should ask for clarification, though, is this a "revert one edit" tool (as in, keeping any and all edits after the edit you're reverting) or a "revert back to a previous version" tool (as in, all later edits will also get wiped out)?
Also, I don't know if it's possible tech-wise, but some kind of limit on how many reverts can be done in a row to the same page might help ward off possible revert wars.
Apparently I am adorable, but my GF is my #1 Groupie. (Avatar by Dreki-K)
Urk. Yeah, as much as shimaspawn has a good point, a limit on how far general tropers can revert back seems almost required to me, then.
Maybe give mods the ability to revert farther back if needed?
Apparently I am adorable, but my GF is my #1 Groupie. (Avatar by Dreki-K)It seems almost required to me that we don't lock a date you can't reverse past. There are no problems that it solves and lots of issues it causes. Even just in normal editing it's common to revert back several entries because they all happen to be natter. I've never seen a wiki that had a limit to how far you revert.
Reality is that, which when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away. -Philip K. Dick
Yes, but most wikis I've seen are MediaWiki ones, where you can choose to revert just a single edit.
In fact, that's even the default in terminology. "Revert" removes just a single edit, while "rollback" is what goes back to a previous version (essentially a one-click mass revert). And "rollback" is a special admin power on those wikis, while "revert" is usually something any editor (or any known editor) can do.
Being able to erase lots of edits in one go just seems like too powerful an ability to give to every troper. Give to mods, yes, but not the average Joe.
edited 20th Aug '11 9:19:53 AM by Jeysie
Apparently I am adorable, but my GF is my #1 Groupie. (Avatar by Dreki-K)

I've heard plenty of people ask for this, and I thought it's high time someone start a thread about it.
People like to vandalize this wiki. People don't like undoing vandalism by hand. In particularly nasty cases, it's really hard and time consuming to fix vandalism.
Let's make it easier on the fixers.
A "revert" button will make it easy to fix vandalism, so the editors and moderators can get back to more productive things.
Vote "revert" button 2011.