Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! This pinned post is here to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules
still apply.
- This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
- While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread
. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
- Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed without spoiler tagging for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.
If you're posting tagged spoilers, make sure that the film or series is clearly identified outside the spoiler tagging. People need to know what will be spoiled before they choose to read the post.
Edited by Mrph1 on Jul 29th 2024 at 3:09:00 PM
I can't think of any reason why it wouldn't be set during the post-snap period.
The only time Marvel has ever gone backwards since Endgame was Black Widow - specifically a movie about a character who was dead in the present - and Loki, which given all the time travel shenanigans doesn't entirely count.
Unless they directly want to tie Shang-Chi's story into Endgame for some reason, we should expect it to be like every other movie they're making these days and be set in more or less the present.
Edited by KnownUnknown on Jul 29th 2021 at 12:18:13 PM
Well, they did go backwards as well for Captain Marvel, although I guess it's because of her origin story taking place in that time period.
Edited by MatthewWayne on Jul 29th 2021 at 12:20:35 PM
"I'm Mr. Blue, woah-woah-ooh..."My only worry for Kamala Khan is that they lean too much into the fangirl aspect, to the point where it gets irritating. I get that's sort of her origin story, but if it goes to the point where she causes more problems than she solves with her powers like the 2005 Fantastic Four movie, it might be a bit of a turn off for me.
"I'm Mr. Blue, woah-woah-ooh..."Yeah, a balance is definitely needed for her superhero fangirlishness. Let it be present, obviously, but it can't be all there is to her.
I really hope we get to see at least one of her fanfics though in an Imagine Spot
I just think it'd be hilarious.
It's a bit similar to the situation between Robin Williams and Disney in the 90's, though iirc Williams was genuinely pissed about that.
In fairness the difference there was that Williams didn't want Disney to exploit his celebrity in marketing and merchandising and got it in his contract that they wouldn't and Disney proceeded to turn around and do exactly that. It was a matter of principles coming from a principled man.
This whole thing revolves around ScarJo getting screwed out of what amounts to royalties due to her contract not accounting for a streaming simul-release.
One reason I think this BW issue will settle quickly and quietly is because this issue is more about compensation, so Disney can just pay her the money owed. And they sure as hell can afford to because they're a multi-billion dollar company and they don't want to lose Feige over things like this
Plus, she's producing a Tower of Terror movie for them and they can just up her up-front salary on that.
"The devil's got all the good gear. What's God got? The Inspiral Carpets and nuns. Fuck that." - Liam Gallagher
IIRC the movie he was doing was FernGully.
The whole thing is just sorta proof positive that the only thing corporate cares about is money. They effectively stumbled on having a then-mega-star like Robin in a movie, of course they're gonna market the shit outta him regarldess of what he himself wants. Soooo yeah. >_>
(Quickly rereading and it looks like it was signed off by Jeff Katzenberg, Petty Asshole, which just makes it worse.)
>
IIRC the movie he was doing was Fern Gully.
I recall reading a factoid it was Toys
have a listen and have a link to my discord serverDisney responds to ScarJo lawsuit, per NYT's Brooks Barnes
:
Edited by Mario1995 on Jul 29th 2021 at 5:28:09 AM
"The devil's got all the good gear. What's God got? The Inspiral Carpets and nuns. Fuck that." - Liam GallagherSo, I guess the question here is how is this going to affect the upcoming MCU films? Are they going to be dual releases, whether or not the renegotiate everyone's contracts? Or are they going to be forced to make them theatrical only to avoid another lawsuit?
Because if they are made theatrical only, fuck that noise. I may have gotten my second dose, but I ain't risking getting a delta variant to see a Marvel movie on the big screen again. Given the current infections rates, I'm really expecting the pandemic to last at least a decent while into 2022.
The best course of action would be to renegotiate those contracts to give the cast a cut of the streaming releases given the real-life circumstances, but I doubt that's the route Disney will take.
The statement from Disney seems to imply that Scar Jo did get some cut from D+ there may be some debate on how much she got and she may be questioning that amount.
That could lead to a rather quick settlement agreement since one of the items her team will demand to see would be the raw D+ numbers for Black Widow and then...its just math on how much the D+ release should have earned for her vs what they paid her.
My guess is that Disney isn't going to be willing to release those numbers let alone have them be entered as evidence and maybe become public, but a Judge will be prone to state "Yeah release the numbers to show how you got to that amount you paid her"
Honestly I don't really have a side here. ScarJo has every right to hold Disney into account for breaching her contract, but this is an actress that's worth $165 million, far more than any actress of color in Hollywood (despite winning zero Oscars). And this is the same ScarJo that's repeatedly defended Joss Whedon's sexist behavior for years.
There's plenty of things to get legitimately pissed at Disney for (like writers or creators getting regularly stiffed of royalties). This ain't it.
Edited by Mario1995 on Jul 29th 2021 at 7:28:53 AM
"The devil's got all the good gear. What's God got? The Inspiral Carpets and nuns. Fuck that." - Liam GallagherYeah, I would have imagined they would have renegotiate her contract before release. Like, up until the release of the film she was still doing promotion for it and knew that it was getting a stream releae. I imagined that either Disney or her manager would have done whatever negotiation would be needed.
It does seem Disney might be applying some Hollywood accounting logic and that's were her main claim comes from. In that sense, I do fully support her, since it does leave a precedent for whenever any major studio decides to screw on some lesser known actors in a similar way.

![[up] [up]](https://static.tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pub/smiles/arrow_up.png)
Considering that trailers for Shang-Chi show the guy partying at a San Francisco nightclub and working as a doorman for a populated hotel...yeah, I somehow doubt this is a post-Snap period. Especially since San Francisco was implied to be a Ghost City in Endgame.
"I'm Mr. Blue, woah-woah-ooh..."