Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! This pinned post is here to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules
still apply.
- This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
- While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread
. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
- Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed without spoiler tagging for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.
If you're posting tagged spoilers, make sure that the film or series is clearly identified outside the spoiler tagging. People need to know what will be spoiled before they choose to read the post.
Edited by Mrph1 on Jul 29th 2024 at 3:09:00 PM
I stand by my claim that recasting Wolverine so soon after Hugh Jackman's role-defining tenure wouldn't be optimal. The public loved X-23 and claims for more of her, so why on God's green earth wouldn't you simply go with X-23 as the Wolverine of the MCU? It'd neatly dodge possible unfavorable comparisons to Hugh Jackman, add some female representation cred to the MCU and be a refreshing choice with lots of new ground to cover to boot.
Edited by Gaon on Apr 19th 2019 at 6:05:12 AM
"All you Fascists bound to lose."I suppose the main problem is that X-23 origin is so tied to Logan's that it's hard to imagine she showing up before him.
And yes, I know Captain Marvel did something similar, but both Carol and Mar-Vell were unknowns before her movie (the latter still is), while Wolverine has been a pop-cultural icon for decades and the origin of X-23 is know public knowledge, so to speak.
I'm sure it is not an impossible hurdle to overcome, but it is a hurdle
Everyone already knows who Wolverine is. You could easily get away with making him a posthumous character.
Edited by LordVatek on Apr 19th 2019 at 9:22:47 AM
This song needs more love.Yeah, with how well-known Logan is I think you could very easily skedaddle past this. I can easily see Marvel doing a X-23 movie about her early life and breaking out of the grip of Weapon X (essentially an adaptation of Origins Episode miniseries Innocence Lost) while looking for her mysterious "father" (who wouldn't show up in this first film), so the MCU spends the first movie teasing what the audience wants (i.e Logan) while establishing X-23 as a character of her own to drum up hype for X-23's movies and to keep audiences salivating for a possible Logan appearance/film. This buys them time to establish X-23 and figure out their gameplan (and give more time for Hugh Jackman to fade away, so to speak) before presumably introducing Logan in some sequel to a hypothetical X-23 franchise as a supporting character after the character is well-established.
It's just good franchise-building sense.
Edited by Gaon on Apr 19th 2019 at 6:49:03 AM
"All you Fascists bound to lose."I don't even mind thatnote , but in the case of X-23 it's just nonsensical.
I mean, why would a young girl born and breed to be a killing machine relie on that after escaping? It just feels like pilling misfortune to an already dark backstory for the sake it, rather than improving the plot or establishing character motivation or anything of the sort.
Bad writing, plain and simple. And the fact that it is a pattern shows a lack of respect towards a very real social ill.
I used to be in the "616 Wolverine is short and ugly!" camp but then I realized that despite his appearance and deep-seated personality flaws, Wolverine is a sex icon. Dude's one of Marvel's most prolific f*ckers, and I mean that in a literal sense. He has never, in his life, had trouble getting laid.
Granted, it never ends well, but that's kinda the point. Wolverine has a murdered girlfriend for every day of the year. He has zero trouble finding tomorrow's fridge-filler. Every woman he so much as glances at is in bed with him by next issue.
In light of this, casting him as a handsome devil actually makes more sense.
Edited by TobiasDrake on Apr 19th 2019 at 9:01:45 AM
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.I’d blame in part Frank Miller, for popularizing “rose above being a prostitute” as a supposed sign a female character is strong back in the 80’s. Black characters get it too, with loads of them having been gangbangers or pimps or drug addicts for ultimately no reason at all.
Miller has a massive madonna-whore complex. The women in his stories are largely either prostitutes or "sexually available" in a gross and exploitative way, or innocent daughter figures who must be protected. And for the latter I can only think of Carrie from TDKR, so even that is more of an exception than anything.
I literally cannot think of a time Frank Millar wrote a woman who wasn't some type of whore. I almost gave up on Batman: Year One when Holly was a prostitute at 13.
Writing a post-post apocalypse LitRPG on RR. Also fanfic stuff.This might help.
In addition to Laura Kinney, there was Mantis, Copycat, Karen Page, and Typhoid Mary.

Seriously,it's hard to top previous Wolverine,getting a younger actor to play a younger wolverine would be one way around that
have a listen and have a link to my discord server