Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! This pinned post is here to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules
still apply.
- This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
- While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread
. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
- Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed without spoiler tagging for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.
If you're posting tagged spoilers, make sure that the film or series is clearly identified outside the spoiler tagging. People need to know what will be spoiled before they choose to read the post.
Edited by Mrph1 on Jul 29th 2024 at 3:09:00 PM
![]()
Like how Venom was gonna originally be a woman who had a miscarriage as a result of a fight between Spider-Man and a supervillain before that was nixed.
Superheroes generally have a mixed track record of addressing collateral damage, which largely comes down to writers thinking it'll make the heroes unlikable if audiences know they killed innocent people or didn't do enough to save them.
"flaws doesn't seem to make Captain America a Mary Sue."
Cap have some sueish train but he is not gone, him and súperman are what I like a call mary sue trigger, a chararter who have a very probability to be a sue, there is a reason Winter soldiders focus more on the other chararter taking to steve rather than him.
But im with swan, mary sue is a term to said you dont like a chararter without offering a why so is just laziness
"My Name is Bolt, Bolt Crank and I dont care if you believe or not"And like I said earlier, it's a very loaded term. It has a strong tendency of wasting people's time debating whether they fit the criteria or not as opposed to any actual substance of the character or the work itself.
It's not that I don't get that sometimes it might be more appropriate in regards to certain characters, but it doesn't really matter if they fit it since it's a term that usually sets a bad tone for the discourse.
I'm gonna guess about 90% of the audience reception to Tony Stark at this point comes down to personality and charisma. It certainly isn't based on his actions or robot suit. If they could find an actress in the right age with the same presence and improv skills— which wouldn't be easy— that's about all you could ask for.
But RDJ's not going to keep playing this part full-time forever. Some fans are inevitably going to resent any change no matter what it is. You've got to stay the course with the fans who are still invested and try and bring the others back around.
I doubt Don Ch Eadler will be playing the role for long either
edited 21st May '17 12:20:53 PM by windleopard
Well, I am actually not sure if it was college, but Tony mentions a memorable Spring Break at one point and considering how young he graduated from MIT....If they meet at any point during their education, Rhodey should be the older one, since Tony took over Stark industries at 21.
edited 21st May '17 1:14:11 PM by Swanpride
I don't really see why Tony needs a replacement. We've already gone four years without an Iron Man solo film, and by the time Phase 3 wraps up in 2019, it'll be six years, more than half the total age of the MCU. Clearly Marvel feels no pressing need to put out movies with the words "Iron Man" in the title, so when RDJ becomes unable or unwilling to continue playing Tony Stark, is there any particular reason to have another character start calling themselves Iron Man?
Neither actor will be around forever, and while they will eventually be recast, I wouldn't do it the minute they're out the door. And while I don't think a direct one-to-one replacement of Iron Man is necessary— lots of other characters around— I just don't think Riri Williams should be ruled out.
That being said I'd rather see She-Hulk, and I'm hoping/pretty sure we'll see Captain Marvel, Black Panther, Falcon, Spider-Man, and Spider-Man step up and be the new Avengers.
...and get Luke Cage in there too, dammit, but that probably isn't going to happen.
I'm not sure if it's raised or not, but you can totally see the light hitting the fork on Lockjaw, it's just angled back and grainy. But where's Bolt's tuning fork? That's the real question.
Cool. More bulldog, more better. Here's hoping this looks good in IMAX high def, I guess.
edited 21st May '17 8:27:44 PM by Unsung

"Mary Sue" is a term which is often used wrongly, but that doesn't mean that the phenomenon it describes doesn't exist. So, since I still haven't heard a description of Riri's character, I would say that this actually might be a case of one. That doesn't mean that she can't become a good character later on...Skye from Ao S started out as a borderline Mary Sue (borderline because the show did show her character flaws from the get go, its main failure was to put a little bit too much focus on this one character in an ensemble show as well as not really explaining very well why Coulson wanted her on his team) but developed into a layered character. But I doubt that I would have stuck around to see the Skye show, so it was good that she was part of an ensemble.