Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! This pinned post is here to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules
still apply.
- This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
- While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread
. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
- Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed without spoiler tagging for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.
If you're posting tagged spoilers, make sure that the film or series is clearly identified outside the spoiler tagging. People need to know what will be spoiled before they choose to read the post.
Edited by Mrph1 on Jul 29th 2024 at 3:09:00 PM
Yeah.
"X wants to write Y Marvel movie" has to mesh with "Marvel wants X to write Y movie" in order for a job offer to happen. They're a film studio, not an advanced scriptwriting class.
edited 27th Feb '16 9:43:07 AM by TobiasDrake
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.I know that a lot of people complain that the directors don't have more creative freedom, but I am glad about it. The MCU is a cinematic serial - emphasis on serial. They need directors who embrace the concept and are able to built up on what is already there as well as building towards the next big thing, not directors who want to do their own personal pet project. Imho Wright leaving Ant-man was a good thing because otherwise, we wouldn't have gotten a Wasp or the chance that Janet will be back one day. Ava D. not doing Black Panther and instead giving the franchise into the hands of a director who has already shown that he can work within a franchise while still doing something which stands out was a good decision which hopefully pans out. Warner Bros supposedly wants to do it differently (I believe it when I see it), so I guess we will soon see if a cinematic universe can work if every director has his creative freedom unlimited by a bigger plan.
I don't think it's impossible for a director to have creative freedom while still working under the parameters of a cinematic universe either. James Gunn was able to imprint his own mark on Guardians of the Galaxy, as was Joss Whedon in The Avengers, Kenneth Branagh's fondness of Shakespeare bled through Thor, and Joe Johnston's work with camp and pulp (like the Rocketeer) is absolutely everywhere in The First Avenger.
"All you Fascists bound to lose."
There you have my agreement. For me the question is always "does the director want to make a movie about the heroes while adding his own little touches" (that would be what happens in the MCU), or "does the director want to make his movie, using the hero as a vehicle for his ideas". That would be the Nolan Trilogy. Which mostly worked, no question. But there are a number of examples where it really didn't work.
One of them said the problem was really more that nobody at Marvel Studios gave a shit about making a Doctor Strange movie when they pitched. This was in the early stages of the studio when they were focusing on getting out the Avengers and their solo movies, so all these other characters we're just seeing now were very low priorities.
Someone a while back came in here and wondered how the series worked with the movies and we had a big talk about how none of the animated or live action series affect the movies in any meaningful way. This is kinda interesting since the series that Disney/Marvel wanted people to see after seeing the movie has now cast a character that the movies won't have instead of waiting to do the same as the MCU.
edited 27th Feb '16 12:48:43 PM by LordofLore
I think that's a good thing. The shows trying to completely ape the movies without having inside info on what the movies are actually doing has rarely worked in their favor, so just doing their own version of the Star-Lord's dad plot instead of trying to sync up to the movies at least doesn't have that problem.
Sooo...
Based on the Elektra trailer, you guys think Elodie Yung will knock it out of the park as Elektra better than Jennifer Garner?
For as much advertisement for the films as the can get.
Just like how Avengers Assemble isn't part of the MCU but exists to make people watching it go "hey! Just like the movie!" as much as possible.
edited 27th Feb '16 4:54:44 PM by KnownUnknown
I'm so angry about how mediocre it is.
Because it has flashes of what it could be.
They dealt with explosive cud chewing space warping tyrannosaurus-esque space cattle in the most recent episode.
Drax got to wear a cowboy hat.
Forever liveblogging the Avengers

IIRC Marvel didn't like that he wanted to focus on both Stephen and Clea after writing 1602. They said no to his and del Toro's ideas for a movie so they both moved on to non-Marvel movie projects.
edited 27th Feb '16 9:23:31 AM by LordofLore