Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! This pinned post is here to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules
still apply.
- This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
- While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread
. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
- Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed without spoiler tagging for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.
If you're posting tagged spoilers, make sure that the film or series is clearly identified outside the spoiler tagging. People need to know what will be spoiled before they choose to read the post.
Edited by Mrph1 on Jul 29th 2024 at 3:09:00 PM
![]()
So what's the problem with her picking it up when drastic shit is going down? That was the whole idea: Thor and Hulk captured, the worlds in danger, only one who can save them is Jane. Boom, suddenly she can pick up the hammer.
I mean, I would also add in the cancer plotline from the comics, because that would also be a neat parallel and add into the whole "self sacrifice" - i.e. she's fighting even though she's sick because that would give her much more to do, acting wise.
edited 22nd Jan '16 11:51:25 AM by alliterator
Keep in mind that what constitutes worthiness according to Mjolnir is incredibly vague.
More so in the comics where it moved the goalposts to Odin's extreme frustration.
Hah.
Forever liveblogging the AvengersI think the whole thing with Mjolnir in Ultron was kind of dumb, and suspect it was only there to justify bypassing the other characters being distrustful of Vision so they could get straight to the action.
The problem is that now it leads to problems just like this - anyone besides Thor who uses it now is explicitly worthier than Captain America and all the Avengers.
edited 22nd Jan '16 11:56:08 AM by KnownUnknown
To be blunt, it's unclear what qualities Thor has that qualify him for Mjolnir that none of the other Avengers can match. Worthiness is not well-enough defined to make blanket statements as to who is and is not worthy.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Thor: "Jane, I'm dying. Take Mjolnir. You are the only one I can trust with it."
Sif: "This is why Volstagg is my new best friend."
Thing is, there isn't really anything to say that someone's worthiness is so fickle in the MCU. Neither of the people who can pick the hammer up (again, assuming Vision actually counts) are ever concretely shown to have any problems once they prove themselves worthy.
And if self-sacrifice is a key element (again, not demonstrated in the MCU because all we have is Thor and maybe Vision), Steve and Tony have already demonstrated that they're willing to put themselves on the line to save other people. That's not a trait that's gone away.
edited 22nd Jan '16 1:29:01 PM by Khfan429
I will say this in Jane-Thor's favor, at least the reason Thor loses Mjolnir won't be as dumb as it was in Original Sin.
edited 22nd Jan '16 1:37:04 PM by alliterator
Actually, Jason Aaron tends to play the long game, so I think it's only a matter of time before the Odinson reveals what Fury told him (remember: he was about to tell Thor back when he thought she was someone else).
But Thor has already been shown as worthy, sort of. In Hickman's Avengers, he goes into the Multiverse to stop the Beyonders and wields the hammer of "Thorr," an alternate Thor whose hammer would only be held by the Unworthy. But at the end of that storyline, Odinson realized he could no longer pick up the hammer and laughed at the irony as the Beyonders were bearing down on him. And we haven't seen him since!
edited 22nd Jan '16 1:43:50 PM by alliterator
Just because it hasn't happened doesn't mean that it can't happen. There is no set of rules that Mjolnir carries around to determine exact worthiness. It's a magic hammer. It can do what it wants.
edited 22nd Jan '16 1:50:01 PM by alliterator
I'm saying the rules aren't clear. And my main criticism against Jane-Thor remains: Jane isn't interesting enough for me to want her to be Thor. It's only the fifth movie with him in it, and his third solo movie, it's way too early to hand off his entire identity to his chemistry-lacking love interest.
You have to make her heroic (or at least, Thor-ish) enough to succeed where the entirety of the original Avengers team failed, because there aren't any rules to say it's easier to prove your worth in an emergency situation. And you have to make it convincing, which considering Jane's characterization track record in the last two Thor movies, is difficult. It has to be a situation where she would need to sacrifice herself (and aside from her satellite connection to Thor, she's not that important), and where she has enough agency for her choice to matter. And if it has anything to do with her sacrificing herself to save Thor specifically, that's lame for the same reason it was lame in Disney's Hercules.
edited 22nd Jan '16 2:02:07 PM by Khfan429
Except I can easily think of a way for all of that to be done in one movie.
And the fact that she hasn't had much to do in previous movies doesn't mean that she shouldn't do much in this movie. The last Thor movie also means it's the last Jane Foster movie, since she's pretty much been a main character along with Thor in them, so I'd say that she needs to do something big in Ragnarok. (Thor, meanwhile, will be appearing in the Infinity War movies, where I'm sure he'll get plenty of big moments.)
edited 22nd Jan '16 2:09:54 PM by alliterator
She really doesn't. It's a Thor movie, and since Thor in this universe is one single person, there's no reason Jane needs to continue being anything other than a supporting player. Considering how dull she is and how her relationship with Thor dragged down the last movie, they'd be better off setting it across the other realms and leaving Jane and company out of it entirely. Also, as far as I know, there's nothing saying this is the last Thor movie.
And you're right, I can't just rule it out based on the hammer. But there's also nothing saying she definitely could pick up the hammer, and it wouldn't change how unsatisfying from a narrative perspective Jane-Thor would be considering that it would be saying she's more worthy than most (if not all since, again, don't know about Vision) non-Thor superheroes, all the evidence of which would be coming from a single movie because the others have her as boring as dry white toast.
edited 22nd Jan '16 2:30:27 PM by Khfan429
I'm still waiting on that answer for how Thor is more worthy than the rest of the Avengers.
Is he a mightier warrior than the Hulk? A more noble hero than Captain America? More cunning than Iron Man? What makes him special in a way that makes him objectively superior to every other member of the Avengers? Why is Thor, without question, the greatest superhero who has ever existed?
Because if picking up the hammer makes Jane objectively better than the Avengers, then that means Thor is already objectively better than them. The alternative, that Mjolnir's criteria is subject to the whims of the plot, would leave no reason why Jane shouldn't be able to pick up the hammer just because Cap couldn't.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.

The argument is Jane is nowhere near as morally heroic as the Avengers, who couldn't pick it up, so she shouldn't be able to lift it unless some really drastic shit goes down.
"All you Fascists bound to lose."