Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! This pinned post is here to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules
still apply.
- This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
- While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread
. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
- Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed without spoiler tagging for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.
If you're posting tagged spoilers, make sure that the film or series is clearly identified outside the spoiler tagging. People need to know what will be spoiled before they choose to read the post.
Edited by Mrph1 on Jul 29th 2024 at 3:09:00 PM
JARVIS is (according to tie-in material) based on Howard's butler who took care of Tony when he was a child. You'd need to find Edith Jarvis some other function rather than butler (because that by canon has to be a male Jarvis) and still have her serve Male!Jarvis role as Howard's herald somehow.
Really gender flipping Jarvis requires too much mental gymnastics.
"All you Fascists bound to lose."Tony met the actual Jarvis in person. He was raised by him personally for goodness' sake. And the tie-in comics don't just state he's male, they explicitly show him on-panel.
Also, it allows the show to portray a pair of opposite-sex leads who are purely platonic Heterosexual Life-Partners who have utterly zero UST. It's still amazingly rare to the point that movies like Pacific Rim are one of the exceptions that proves the rule. You might not think it matters, but for a ton of people (including myself) it's a huge media issue.
edited 10th Oct '15 7:26:16 PM by AlleyOop
No, shut up. Just make all of them women. Recast everyone. An all-female universe. Except for the villains. The villains can all be men because they all die anyway.
My various fanfics.Ignore the tie-in comics.
I have a hard time believing those have never been contradicted so much as once already.
edited 10th Oct '15 7:41:33 PM by Wackd
Maybe you'd be less disappointed if you stopped expecting things to be Carmen Sandiego movies.@Sonofsharknado
Two strawmen don't make a right. Responding to offense by being overly easily offended yourself doesn't help anyone.
Re: the tie-in comics, to date the only one which has been overwritten is the first Captain America one, by The Winter Soldier. And that was a relatively last minute change, since it was originally going to open with the line spoken in a war flashback at the beginning. All the other ones still hold true, including the Iron Man 3 prelude that explained Rhodey's absence during The Avengers and which pretty much everyone accepts as canon.
edited 10th Oct '15 7:38:05 PM by AlleyOop
I can see the argument though for having Peggy interact with some of the SSR secretaries. Because as it is, the show does sort of present Peggy as extraordinary- I mean she is in that she's basically James Bond- but I mean she isn't the only woman facing a glass ceiling.
That being said, Angie reinforces the idea of that being a universal concern. Also, I think the plotting may have suffered had Peggy had such a bond- both because of timing/pacing issues and because a big aspect of the season is that Peggy doesn't really feel much loyalty toward her co-workers.
Edit- But yeah, besides the fact that he's male in all comics tie in or otherwise, it's important for Jarvis to be a guy- both for having a male and female who are friends without a romantic aspect- and probably also to avoid portraying all male characters on the show as sexist lugs.
edited 10th Oct '15 7:39:43 PM by Hodor2
Agreed. Otherwise the whole show becomes a bad caricature.
There's also Howard I guess.
edited 10th Oct '15 7:47:22 PM by edvedd
Visit my Tumblr! I may say things. The Bureau ProjectI mean, if there was something I'd like them to change about Agent Carter, it's that even though Peggy is really charming we don't actually know that much about her. She's definitely not in danger of becoming a Mary Sue, but it would be nice if the show went into more of her backstory or if she had some serious character flaws to explore and overcome, the way Thor had to overcome his own arrogance or Peter Quill learned to be less immature.
I think she has had said flaws to overcome. The first few episodes had her struggling with becoming distant to friends and denying help out of fear, something that Jarvis kindly encourages her out of. Then by the last episode she's learned to value herself instead of wishing for awards and praise. She also turned out to be just as vulnerable to the "supposedly meek lady" dupe, as Dottie proved.
Though getting more backstory I certainly wouldn't mind. We don't know anything about her pre-war life. If Sharon is her niece, then she must have a sibling somewhere.
edited 10th Oct '15 7:58:08 PM by Tuckerscreator
It would have been completely inappropriate at the time for Howard, a bachelor and notorious lady's man, to have a female butler (besides the fact that it's not a particularly common concept to begin with).
And from a narrative perspective, it doesn't make a lot of sense either. Peggy and Jarvis are a reversal of the typical James Bond/Bond Girl dynamic: she's the superstar secret agent, he's the assistant dragged along for the ride, and there's absolutely nothing sexual between them.
By making Jarvis a woman, you not only lose that commentary, you lose one of the few non-chauvinist men in the show, and you don't add any kind of message worth having, either. It adds another woman to Peggy's life, but because we already have Angie as our "regular gal" character, doubling down on that with Jarvis does nothing except start sending the message that Peggy is special despite being a woman.
Removing the character of Jarvis from the role he serves as a foil to Peggy and treating him as his own character, there's also the fact that the central tension in his character is that he's a very peaceful and non-violent person despite his military background. If Jarvis is a woman in the 1940s, he can't have that background, and the entire character is something different.
There is a right way and a wrong way to suggest how to include more women and people of colour in something. Pointing at a given character and saying "Why weren't they [x]? They should have been [x]!" is the wrong way, and isn't conducive to anything besides combative arguments.
ETA: Also, the MCU already has a female Jarvis. Her name is Pepper Potts.
edited 10th Oct '15 8:23:11 PM by BadWolf21
Well put.
Another thing that struck me- In the first Iron Man movie, the scene with Christine Everheart and Pepper kind of rubs me the wrong way- by having Pepper talk about taking out the trash, it feels like the movie is encouraging us to denigrate the women Tony seduces by having another female character give approval. And it's sort of like Pepper is the exception that proves the rule as far as the movie's view of women goes.
Agent Carter does the opposite. It seems to disapprove of Howard's philandering and doesn't look down on his conquests- and one way that comes across is by having both Peggy and Jarvis disapprove of Howard's behavior. If Jarvis was female, you'd have a repeat of the Pepper situation.
She does try treating her with utmost respect and civility at first, she only unleashes that remark when Christine makes a condescending observation about her role as Stark's secretary.
"All you Fascists bound to lose."

Make Jarvis a chick. Make Fennhoff a chick. Make the telephone operators moderately important. There. You keep your all-dude SSR without making it so only one woman has an actual character plot.
It would not be super-difficult to retcon in a reason why JARVIS in modern times has a masculine voice. Perhaps that JARVIS is based on fem!Jarvis' never-seen husband.
edited 10th Oct '15 7:16:03 PM by Wackd
Maybe you'd be less disappointed if you stopped expecting things to be Carmen Sandiego movies.