Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! This pinned post is here to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules
still apply.
- This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
- While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread
. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
- Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed without spoiler tagging for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.
If you're posting tagged spoilers, make sure that the film or series is clearly identified outside the spoiler tagging. People need to know what will be spoiled before they choose to read the post.
Edited by Mrph1 on Jul 29th 2024 at 3:09:00 PM
![]()
No, nobody knows that. All anybody knows is that that is an opinion held by some people. There are other people who think it was just fine, suitably justified, and that people complaining about it are basically complaining about something that ultimately lead nowhere, which was entirely the point.
edited 10th Sep '15 4:07:27 PM by Khfan429
Yeah, the scene was that she was going to make up a story about how it was all just a lie (yo dawg I heard you like lies) to get an emotional rage out of him, triggering a Hulk-out.
Pushing him off the cliff while both parties know he'll be unharmed and reflexively Hulk out is, somewhat ironically, a much safer and kinder way of bringing out the Hulk. It's still a betrayal in the sense that she's dragging him into combat instead of running away with him like they had discussed, but it's at least a nicer way of going about it.
You cannot firmly grasp the true form of Squidward's technique!The romance between Widow and Banner came out of nowhere (and was badly done), and you know it.
It didn't come out of nowhere - Bruce and Natasha actually had a fair amount of scenes together in the first Avengers. She recruited him, confronted the Hulk even though she was terrified of him, and then when Bruce came back, they had that moment of bonding.
So, no, it didn't come out of nowhere.
I don't like the romance. I think it's shoehorned in, and there's few things I dislike more in my action flicks than the obligatory Romantic Plot Tumor.
But what you're suggesting is to basically derail Black Widow into a complete and utter asshole. It's two completely unrelated issues.
edited 10th Sep '15 4:11:23 PM by Anomalocaris20
You cannot firmly grasp the true form of Squidward's technique!I liked Bruce/Natasha as a plot, but I don't like what it does to the rest of the movie—take one of the film's three female characters and put her in a romance. In a world where The Avengers was like 75% female I would've liked it better, but then, I would like most things better in that world.
Maybe you'd be less disappointed if you stopped expecting things to be Carmen Sandiego movies.Bruce and Natasha felt like it needed, like, a whole other movie's worth of time to develop properly to me. It felt really rushed and, yes, like it came out of nowhere.
But I don't think the best solution is to turn Natasha into an "evil traitorous wench." Her name is Black Widow, but it doesn't have to be literal.
edited 10th Sep '15 4:24:26 PM by Mukora
"It's so hard to be humble, knowing how great I am."The only thing I appreciate about it is that it ended badly. Not only because we won't have to worry about it in the future, but because it does actually add some decent drama to the end of their character arcs.
I still don't like it though. It's just such a stupid choice of characters with no chemistry, and the plot screeching to a halt to show them awkwardly flirting or other characters commenting on how great they are together. I'd have much prefered different character arcs for them.
Avengers 1 and Winter Soldier didn't have any romance plot in them and they're two of the most well-regarded films in the MCU. Between Ultron and Ant-Man you'd think they'd take the hint that they shouldn't feel obligated to throw one in.
edited 10th Sep '15 4:29:17 PM by Anomalocaris20
You cannot firmly grasp the true form of Squidward's technique!"You're real pleasant, aren't you?" was just the perfect mix of sarcasm and understatement to make me chuckle.
Maybe you'd be less disappointed if you stopped expecting things to be Carmen Sandiego movies.That's interesting about cutting/changing Iron Man and Cap being antagonistic the whole film.
I'm not sure if it would have worked better, but it's interesting to know that because as it is, it's sort of like we got a couple of scenes where Cap is really angry at Tony and I guess it sort of contributes to my thinking Whedon is using Tony as a mouthpiece and Cap as a straw man because of the fact we don't see reciprocal behavior.
Think I agree with the decision with Nat. I thought the pushing scene was effective in showing that as much as Nat can care for people and likes the idea of being a hero, she's always going to default to pragmatic operative.
Yes it came "out of nowhere", because we absolutely know everything these two have been doing for, like, over an year.
You know, I actually like that the movie don't pretend the characters stayed exactly like we last left them. There is time skips between the movies.
edited 10th Sep '15 6:50:10 PM by Heatth
Uhummm... In avengers when Bruce and Natasha first met he messed around with a baby crib, saying we can't always have what we want. Is it ironic that small detail somehow became a subplot for age of ultron? Hulk and black widow do not have the benefit of their own movies per year like everyone else so whatever happens may not be easily foreshadowed. An Avenger movie give us very small glimpse of so and so's next arc. Between films things happen and they wont always get brought up in someone else's solo. Do we need to know when Natasha and Bruce were romanticly involved prior to age of ultron or was Miss Hawkeye's line about how Nat grew a crush on the least expecting person natural enough to accept? It's not a matter of how and when it happened but why and who it happened to. Whedon forever said the Avengers are a family and now Russo Bros follows him. Like in our reality love just happens among those close to you. If there is a connection and anything can meet the requirements. Sure going further into why would help but I got the same point while it was still in smaller doses. Now if they had their own movie to share together in the Jessica Jones x Luke cage sense then there would be more than enough time to explore romance
edited 10th Sep '15 7:39:57 PM by xbimpy
Genuinely curious, considering where the relationship ultimately (didn't) go, would it have been better if the movie had taken more time to set up an ultimately doomed pairing?
All things considered, I have a hard time believing giving more screen time to the relationship would have made it any better. Instead it'd just fan the complaints that it took up too much time.
I'm not sure if it would have worked better, but it's interesting to know that because as it is, it's sort of like we got a couple of scenes where Cap is really angry at Tony and I guess it sort of contributes to my thinking Whedon is using Tony as a mouthpiece and Cap as a straw man because of the fact we don't see reciprocal behavior.
I didn't see that at all. In fact, I saw what that while both had made good points, that Tony was too impulsive, too willing to do things by himself rather than tell others. Cap, on the other hand, had a lot more trust on everyone else. It was Cap that had sympathy for the Twins, that immediately trusted them to do the right thing.
edited 10th Sep '15 7:25:37 PM by alliterator
![]()
![]()
Perhaps, but ultimately it didn't work because if the intention was to tug at the heartstrings by showing the romance sputtering and ending tragically, it failed because there wasn't enough build-up to warrant caring about it.
I find it similar to the people who complained about Quicksilver being the "big" Avengers death that was teased, because ultimately, we didn't know him well enough for it to truly have impact.
edited 10th Sep '15 7:51:52 PM by comicwriter

Yeah, that sounds...not good.
Also, the scene sounds like she was lying to him about not falling for him.
edited 10th Sep '15 4:06:57 PM by alliterator