Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! This pinned post is here to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules
still apply.
- This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
- While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread
. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
- Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed without spoiler tagging for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.
If you're posting tagged spoilers, make sure that the film or series is clearly identified outside the spoiler tagging. People need to know what will be spoiled before they choose to read the post.
Edited by Mrph1 on Jul 29th 2024 at 3:09:00 PM
Why not? I don't think they were planning to make these big franchises and do constant reboots when they bought the rights. If they were lucky they could probably expect to make four or five movies over those ten years at which point interest would wane and the rights would just revert. Heck, at the time Spider-Man 3 and X-Men 3 came out it looked like those movies would be the end of their franchises. That was only about halfway through the contract period.
The other studios had Marvel over the same barrel Marvel currently has Sony over.
Sony's not in any danger of bankruptcy, mind, but the Spider-Man franchise's profitability has been steadily waning. It's a bad position to be in where your only options are to make a guaranteed flop or lose the ability to make any money at all.
Given the choice between making no money and making negative money, Sony opted to sit down to the table and try a piece of the MCU pie instead. Fox is not yet in that position.
edited 5th Aug '15 2:27:51 PM by TobiasDrake
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Just remember: in the '70s, DC Comics was bought by a company that eventually become Warner Brothers Communications. DC has been owned by a billion dollar company for most of the time it's been around.
Marvel, on the other hand, was owned by a magazine company. Which flopped. And then it was bought by a film company. Which flopped. And then a toy company. Which flopped.
Other comic companies exist.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.![]()
Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't the relatively small size of Dark Horse, IDW, et al mean that a DC/Marvel fusion would be considered a defacto monopoly?
I mean, Disney's bought a few production companies, but Universal, Fox, Warner Bros., and Paramount are still serious competitors.
Maybe you'd be less disappointed if you stopped expecting things to be Carmen Sandiego movies.The best case scenario would be marvel IP sold off wholesale to DC.
The worst case would have been the properties being auctioned off to different companies.
Among other things, that would have made selling reprints of earlier stuff very difficult.
Forever liveblogging the AvengersMonopoly is rarely an issue in the media because, well, those rules are mainly created to prevent one company to control the whole market and force the customer to pay unreasonable prices as a result. But even a studio which owns various properties can hardly own all the publisher and movie productions, and even if they own a number of successful franchises, there is no need for the audience to watch them. Monopoly only becomes an issue if, for example, the big studios start to make under the table agreements to keep the salaries of their employees down and similar.
When if comes to Marvel and Fox, I am on Marvel's side because I think that Fox is misusing the agreement. As far as I can tell the clause that the rights get extended was originally added to ensure that if Fox built up a successful franchise like X-men, Marvel can't suddenly turn up and say "well, that's nice, but now those characters revert back to us, thanks for your good work". But Fox is using the clause as a loophole. Whenever a right is about to expire, they are putting a cheap production in motion, showing the movie in one theatre and therefore are able to keep the rights. The only reason why they didn't do this with Daredevil is because someone at Fox dropped the ball and didn't put the movie into production in time. While what Fox is doing is not against the contract, it is twisting the spirit of the agreement.
Cheap movie production? Days of Future Past cost $200 million to make.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Oh. They haven't posted a budget yet but the new one looks fairly expensive.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.![]()
![]()
I am not talking about X-men. That's the property Fox has obviously an interest in, even if I don't like their take personally. But if you ask me, Fox is one of the main reasons why Fantastic 4 never became a really big seller. How could it with a mainstream media presence which looks like this?
The new one isn't a cheap production but the main reason why it isn't is because they thought that the director of chronicle might be able to make something successful of the property, not because they believed in the property itself.
edited 5th Aug '15 6:03:56 PM by Swanpride
Whenever a right is about to expire, they are putting a cheap production in motion, showing the movie in one theatre and therefore are able to keep the rights.
As they say on the internet, lolwut.
The above quote describes nothing of what Fox has done with the F4 rights since the 2005 release (the unreleased 1994 F4 movie
was a desperate grab to retain the film rights, I'm not disputing that). None of them have been a "cheap production", and neither of the released films have been shown in only one theater.
(Some numbers on the Fox-F4 franchise
.)
You may not like what Fox is doing with the reboot (I'm indifferent, as I never really cared that much about F4, comics or movies), but that doesn't make it a half-assed grab to retain property rights
All your safe space are belong to TrumpEh, I think the main reason the Fantastic Four never really caught on is because of the Fantastic Four.
Each of the individual members of the Fantastic Four is capable of being an engaging and compelling character and is a lot of fun to have in the shared universe when they appear in other people's comics. When you put them all together and make them have an adventure together, though, the result is significantly less than the sum of its parts.
The same also holds true for Doom, who is a far better character when he's not duking it out with the ACCURSED RICHARDS and is free to just go be Marvel's definitive Evil Overlord with style and class.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.![]()
It is obvious that Fox's sole interest on the property is to keep it out of Marvel's hands. They announced this movies years ago but didn't put it into production until the very last minute.
Granted, the cheap production trick is what they wanted to do with Daredevil (thankfully they didn't in the end), but what is the future of the F4 at Fox? Another movie in ten years in which someone makes some movie and then slaps the Fantastic 4 title on it?

They probably shouldn't have agreed to perpetual contracts though. If they had signed ones that only had a ten year lifespan they would have all the rights back by now.
The contracts are for ten years - the studios have to make a movie every ten years or the contracts expire (that's how Marvel got back Daredevil and Ghost Rider and The Punisher). However, if the studios do make a movie within the allotted time period, they keep the rights.
Marvel probably shouldn't have included that, yes, but at the time they were going through bankruptcy. They pretty much needed cash and needed it right away. Writers, artists, editors, all of them were super worried about losing their jobs. So I don't blame Marvel at all for not caring what the contract said. After all, who could have predicted that they would form Marvel Studios and created an interconnected movie universe? A comic book/toy company making a movie studio? Unheard of!