Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! This pinned post is here to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules
still apply.
- This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
- While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread
. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
- Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed without spoiler tagging for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.
If you're posting tagged spoilers, make sure that the film or series is clearly identified outside the spoiler tagging. People need to know what will be spoiled before they choose to read the post.
Edited by Mrph1 on Jul 29th 2024 at 3:09:00 PM
"Within the next decade?" clarified Feige before replying, "I would think so, for sure." When asked if this has been part of the discussion, Feige said that they let the source material take the lead when determining characters and storylines.
“Well in the drawing board going up to 2019 it remains to be seen. The comics always make the path that we get to have the fun of saying, ‘Yeah let’s choose this way or let’s choose this way’ and I think there are a lot of cool things happening in the comics now that — it’s usually a five to ten-year cycle between when something happens in the comics and when we can do it in the movie, sometimes a little less, but 'Civil War' is certainly about the 10-year mark. 'Winter Soldier,' I think, was around that time. So we always look at stuff that’s happening in the comics and go, ‘Where could we do that?’ Sometimes it’s sooner, but there’s no reason why that couldn’t happen in the next decade or sooner.”
edited 29th Jun '15 11:24:37 AM by LordofLore
I know he's trying to hedge his bets, but one character in the next decade is a really low bar to set. It's as simple as making a character Bi The Way, and Loki is already canon bisexual. AFAIK Falcon has no major love interests in the comics outside his little crush on Widow in the movies, so he's also a good candidate.
edited 29th Jun '15 12:19:04 PM by AlleyOop
Honestly it's so clear that the new character in Got G is either Phyla or Moondragon I'm surprised MARVEL Studios doesn't just commit to it and say 'LGBT major character in 2017!'
There are also already LGBT characters in the MCU, they just haven't had their sexualities explored. (Loki, Victoria Hand, other characters probably).
I thought MCU!Loki was straight and Hand was killed off(with them saying they didn't want to say that she was gay only to kill her off directly because that would look bad).
Edit: Full title of Gotg2 is Guardians of the Galaxy Volume 2.
Feel like I should post the cover to the first issue of the comic book Guardians of the Galaxy volume 2.
◊
edited 29th Jun '15 12:39:49 PM by LordofLore
All of a sudden exploring Loki as bisexual or cis probably wouldn't work for a couple of reasons. The first and most important is that having him Suddenly Sexuality into a Depraved Bisexual will backfire. Badly. I can hear the backlash from having the character who is practically defined as being evil because of emotional confusion and obsessively delusional desire be MCU's frontline bisexual character already.
The second is that comics Loki, while definitely bisexual and of nebulous gender, isn't LGBT in a modern sense. Rather, he's in the ancient god sense of "fuck anything compatible and use shapeshifting to become compatible with everything else" sense (in the issue where he teams up with Spider-Man, he even lampshades it). Playing a character with classical sensibilities and ideals with suddenly modern sensibilities and ideals wouldn't work all that well - it'd be like portraying Zeus as being in the closet.
edited 29th Jun '15 1:36:38 PM by KnownUnknown
Interesting enough he can easily turn into anything as long as it's "me". Woman, man it makes no difference. He doesn't see himself as a small buzzing kind of person so he can't easily turn into a fly for instance.
Odin is pretty cool with him and when talking about his kids calls them "My son(Thor), my daughter(Aldrif/Angela) and my child who is both(Loki)".
edited 29th Jun '15 1:43:41 PM by LordofLore
![]()
Yep. Hell, while Inverted he turned into a unicorn.
◊
Balder is kind of dead. He wasn't with the rest of the family.
edited 29th Jun '15 1:51:05 PM by LordofLore
T'Chaka's still alive after all? Well then. I hope Wakanda is as full of Scenery Porn and Technology Porn as I hope it is.
5x While I doubt he'll ever go through a full Heel–Face Turn, it doesn't need to be the case if he's in a homosexual relationship that acts as one of the stabilizing forces in his life. Anyway I doubt MCU Loki will run into the issue of being trans or genderfluid, as shapeshifting proper doesn't seem to be in his repertoire.
edited 29th Jun '15 1:53:19 PM by AlleyOop
Balder died? When? How?
I don't think MCU Loki being bisexual and Bigender/gender fluid is problematic; his instability comes from his insecurity about his standing within his family. If anything, his sexuality can enrich that, as they're a ruling family; his commitment towards making heirs is important, as is taking the titles of maidens rather than having his titles taken by lords.
This has me interested.
Marvel posted a ton of new Ant-Man videos today on their youtube channel
, including a new 1-minute TV spot and a bunch of 25 second character promos.
A lot more focus on Scott Lang's crew then what the trailers showed. ...I get the impression that none of them are what could be described as hardcore criminals.

perhaps they use the same trick to give the actors more facetime