Welcome to the main discussion thread for the Marvel Cinematic Universe! This pinned post is here to establish some basic guidelines. All of the Media Forum rules
still apply.
- This thread is for talking about the live-action films, TV shows, animated works, and related content that use the Marvel brand, currently owned by Disney.
- While mild digressions are okay, discussion of the comic books should go in this thread
. Extended digressions may be thumped as off-topic.
- Spoilers for new releases should not be discussed without spoiler tagging for at least two weeks. Rather, each title should have a dedicated thread where that sort of conversation is held. We can mention new releases in a general sense, but please be courteous to people who don't want to be spoiled.
If you're posting tagged spoilers, make sure that the film or series is clearly identified outside the spoiler tagging. People need to know what will be spoiled before they choose to read the post.
Edited by Mrph1 on Jul 29th 2024 at 3:09:00 PM
I want Loki to die in Ragnarok. I want it to be pathetic, and screaming, and painful, and without beauty or mercy or any poetic suffering.
My various fanfics.@Tobias
Well said. In terms of "Loki's ideology" if you call it that. Loki is very egotistical and even cruel, but when acting normal, his ideology is basically broadly in favor of a (benevolent) absolute monarch and more importantly, he thinks he's the right person for the job.
The whole attitude of being against free will in The Avengers (and as you say, being basically a cringing slave himself) seems off.
Also, I don't think Loki is a fantastic puppetmaster (and I don't think you were arguing this either), but yeah, his plan is pretty bad.
edited 9th Feb '15 11:39:43 AM by Hodor2
![]()
![]()
I wouldn't go that far, but I don't want Ragnarok to be a BS Author's Saving Throw that absolves Loki of his action and has him ending up on the side of the angels.
edited 9th Feb '15 11:37:50 AM by comicwriter
I could see Loki dying like he did in Siegenote , giving
◊ the heroes an edge in the fight
◊ only to be stopped
◊ and killed by the bigger bad.
◊
Edit:
That's a great moment
◊.
edited 9th Feb '15 11:48:14 AM by LordofLore
The thing is Loki in the first movie was not really about the power. It was never about having the throne, it was always about proving that he was better than Thor. If he had wanted the throne, he could have allowed Laufey to kill Odin and then either killed Laufey or keep true to their agreement. But that was not his goal. He wanted to be Odin's favourite son. The Avengers tries to spin it in a way that he attacks the earth because he wants to get one over Thor, and perhaps that might be part of it but interestingly he thinks that Thor pushed him into the abyss when in fact, Loki let go. There is something wrong with his memories at this point, and the way he says "it is too late to stop this" as well as his talks with the other suggests that he is not fully in control over the situation. And in Thor 2 he is back to desiring the acceptance of his family about everything else, even though he pushes them away. And he actually does keep his word and helps Thor and protects Jane for him.
There is a certain tragic in Loki's character (and now that doesn't mean he is a poor innocent wooby). He hates himself because he is a racist when it comes to Jotunns, and he hurts the people who love him him the most even though he actually wants this love but is not ready to admit it to himself out of stupid pride. Or because he truly doesn't believe that they could love a Jotunn.
Like I said, in dire need of therapy.
I maintain that Loki can be both an evil, irredeemable piece of shit and a severely broken and miserable person.
We're always talking in here about how we feel like the villains have no personality or characterization but Loki does and everyone hates him for it seemingly entirely because it means he inspires pity in others. It's irritating.
Maybe you'd be less disappointed if you stopped expecting things to be Carmen Sandiego movies.![]()
I second that.
Similarly, he can have been under the influence of the scepter in Avengers without being a poor, innocent, misunderstood DILP. We have the trope Jerkass Victim for a reason.
edited 9th Feb '15 12:16:50 PM by TobiasDrake
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.It's the exact opposite for me. I love how Loki is depicted in the movies because I feel like they did a good job of giving him a sympathetic backstory while not making it an excuse for why he's an evil piece of shit.
He's a wonderfully nuanced villain which is why I find it annoying when people insist that his actions must be because he was brainwashed and he's totally innocent.
edited 9th Feb '15 12:23:27 PM by comicwriter
I've never once seen anyone in here argue that he's a softy or just misunderstood or not really evil. In other places, rarely, but never here. Every once in a while someone will insinuate that someone, somewhere, has done this, which immediately prompts everyone in the room to begin fervently denying that they've said such a thing. It's all very strange.
Maybe you'd be less disappointed if you stopped expecting things to be Carmen Sandiego movies.
This. I get the impression that some posters here want him to be a Complete Monster, but he isn't (even in Whedon's version). I guess it's somewhat against the norm for the arch enemy of the hero to not be a Complete Monster, but a big part of Loki's character is that on some level he cares for Thor (which doesn't argue at all against him being evil, but it does frame him in a somewhat different than other arch enemy characters).
Edit- Incidentally, something I've posted in the Complete Monster thread that's probably applicable here- A character being irredeemable is not the same thing as a character lacking redeeming qualities. Loki is probably irredeemable- I don't see him pulling a Heel–Face Turn and if a film does hint at him being redeemed, it will almost certainly be a case of Death Equals Redemption. However, he is not totally devoid of redeeming qualities.
edited 9th Feb '15 12:48:50 PM by Hodor2
The moral of the story is yes, it is possible to Ron the Death Eater a villain, just like it is possible to Draco in Leather Pants a hero.
Characters are more complicated than a binary switch between Good Guy and Bad Guy.
edited 9th Feb '15 12:48:05 PM by TobiasDrake
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Loki's still hot, though. Can't deny that.
I've got fanfics for Frozen, Spectacular Spider-Man, Crash Bandicoot, and Spyro the Dragon.What I like about Loki is that he keeps me guessing. I am never sure about his motivations. Like, in the first movie I never expected him to kill Laufey. And in The Avengers he looks pretty drawn and pissed off with the other. Which makes me wonder (like always) if there is more than which we saw on the surface - because with Loki there usually is. That doesn't mean that whatever is beyond the surface is positive...you know "hey, he never intended to kill Odin....he just intended to kill his true father...eh...not sure if that's better....."
What I consider very annoying, though, is that some people just bash the character because...it is cool to do so? I am not sure. And that you get immediatly accused of being a "fangirl" when you say that you find the character compelling.

I'd really rather not because quite frankly the fandom's obsession with Loki as a pwecious widdle baby who just needs a hug and never does anything wrong is tiring for me. I'll gladly accept "space madness" but the explanation that he was kidnapped and brainwashed always made me roll my eyes.
I was happy at the very least TDW didn't have Loki claiming he was under someone else's control.
Having him fight alongside the Avengers in anything other than a slimy Enemy Mine situation that's for his personal gain would scream Pandering to the Base to me.
edited 9th Feb '15 11:34:47 AM by comicwriter