INFJ. It describes me as an activist, which is how I self-identify.
I think I used to be an INTJ.
edited 25th Mar '12 10:26:51 AM by Grain
Anime geemu wo shinasai!INTJ, but all the figures are pretty low:
Introverted - 11%
Intuitive - 12%
Thinking - 12%
Judging - 22%
INTJ Introverted 89 Intuitive 38 Thinking 50 Judging 33
Hmmmm, it would seem that I've shifted somewhat away from INTP over the years.
I'm curious what I would score with an actual evaluation, though - these DIY things, as noted by others, are prone to error.
Happiness is zero-gee with a sinus cold.The first time I took the test, I got ISTJ with:
I: 89% S: 12% T: 50% J: 1%
The second time, however, I received INTJ, though I don't think that's right- the site I was linked too said INT Js display an aura of self confidence, which I don't. With all of this being said, I feel as if I'm more of an INTP.
ISTJ
Introverted: 100% - Sensing: 38% - Thinking: 75% - Judging: 22%
You are:
- very expressed introvert
- moderately expressed sensing personality
- distinctively expressed thinking personality
- slightly expressed judging personality
Sounds about right. As much as I understand it, that is.
People aren't as awful as the internet makes them out to be.ENFJ
I Am:
- slightly expressed extravert (1%)
- distinctively expressed intuitive personality (62%)
- moderately expressed feeling personality (25%)
- slightly expressed judging personality (11%)
EDIT: After reading one of the links
I have come to the conclusion that I'm destined to become a Magnificent Bastard Magnetic Hero:
edited 3rd Apr '12 9:22:57 AM by Qeise
Laws are made to be broken. You're next, thermodynamics.INFP* ... currently trying to develop my Ne and Te more, as I have a bad habit of entering an Fi Si loop.
I didn't just the other parts from a test, just a ton of research. Also for skeptics I forget where but there was some neurological research that validated a lot of what the Myers-Briggs tests purposed, mainly because it was validating Carl Jung whose research the test was based on.
Also I noticed another bit people are confusing:
The MBTI uses the word extrAverted not extrOverted. Extroverted is the state of being social and open, while Extraversion is the gaining of energy from social interaction. You don't have to be extroverted to be an extravert, though it helps.
That's why an introvert can be social, open, and a the life of a party and still be an introvert. Because said party will leave them utterly drained and tired, even though a less social Extravert will usually leave the party filled with energy.
edited 4th Apr '12 9:50:20 AM by Vyctorian
Rarely active, try DA/Tumblr Avatar by pippanaffie.deviantart.comI personally think the Myers Briggs is inaccurate, considering that it assumes that someone has to favour one thing over the other when it's not always the case; you have to be a P or a J, not in the middle. And psychology hasn't found any valid evidence to prove that people actually favour any of the factors in the Myers Briggs model (except for Extroversion/Introversion). This is the kind of test that employers would give the people they're recruiting, but psychologists in general rarely take the system seriously, and give it the same amount of respect as they have for the ancient pseudo-science of the Four Temperaments.
That and the tendency for many people to get different results on different tests (often in the space of one day).
But what the hell? I find this whole Myers Briggs shtick fascinating, so I'll try to type myself anyway. One thing that can be said in its favour is that it's a useful construction frame for writing characters.
The test result said I was INFJ.
- Introverted: 33
- Intuitive: 75
- Feeling: 12
- Judging: 44
Definitely an Introvert, and definitely favours Intuition. I live in an abstract world of possibilities, and think more about what "could be" than what "already is". That, and my tendency to be philosophical about things, and being more concerned over the deeper meaning and purpose behind something than superficial facts.
I'm not sure if I'm a P or a J, because I fit elements of both. Sometimes I like to plan ahead, while other times I like to make things up on the spot. I can be organized to the point of rigidness and be stuck in a train of thought, or I can be disorganized, and lack any real order. But because of my dominant iN, which is stronger than both my T and F (which are both within one step of one another), I'm going to have tip the balance towards J, as according to Jungian theory. I really don't see how my T and F functions can be three steps apart as they would be if I was INFP/INTP.
I'm not going to try and decide whether I'm T or F, though. They're within one step of one another; sometimes I can be sensitive and in tune with my feelings while being quite irrational, and yet sometimes I can be coldly rational as well. Like I said, I don't like the whole "one thing or the other" approach the typology takes, so I'm going to sit on the fence with this one.
INxJ.
edited 11th Jun '12 2:17:58 AM by CrazyDawg

ENTJ.
"Did anybody invent this stuff on purpose?" - Phillip Marlowe on tequila, Finger Man by Raymond Chandler.