Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
![]()
She's running in Kansas. her name is Sharice Davids, for Kansas District 3.
Meanwhile, some harrowing stuff done in our names?
Kids separated from their families detail their experiences.
The notion of Montenegro to attack anyone is idiotic to begin with. For one, of all of the states in the area it might be the most peaceful. Two, most of its neighbours are way, way bigger both in seize and military.
Plus, even if Montenegro would attack someone, that would have had nothing to do with NATO. As it reminded Turkey just two years ago, NATO is a defence alliance, it doesn't intervene in a war in which the NATO country can be considered the aggressor.
but then I doubt that Trump even knows where Montenegro is.
Well, Montenegro was the ONE country which was kind of not really involved in the Balkan wars (well, a little bit, some of their soldiers were plundering Croatia, but the situation was complicated back then), they actually didn't leave Yugoslavia in the early 1990s, initially stayed with Serbia on request of the EU for the sake of the stability of the region and finally left peacefully after Referendum during which they worked with the EU to keep it as fair as possible. And they are working pretty hard on fulfilling the standards to get accepted into the EU (if everything goes by plan, they should get full membership status by 2025).
Basically in the whole Balkan mess Montenegro was pretty much the adult in the room. So it is really rich to call them "aggressive".
Edited by Swanpride on Jul 22nd 2018 at 3:47:21 AM
Reading tropes such as You Know What You Did
Something that has me completely and utterly mystified: two things actually.
1. With the threats posed by ISIS, terrorist remnants in Iraq and Afghanistan, Russia, China, North Korea, and the threats Trump sees in Canada, the UN, the EU, Mexico, women, African Americans, of all those how is Montenegro a threat?
2. Trump is seeking to make enemies of Canada and Europe and allies of Russia and North Korea. Putin and Ill could be accurately described as dictators, tyrants, even if Trump thinks he can make real estate deals with them or thinks they are people to emulate what baffles me is how anyone can think Putin and Ill would not double cross Trump or go back on any deal he may make. Putting any criticism of Trump aside, how can someone as unstable as Ill comes across be trusted?
Currently reading up My Rule Fu Is Stronger than Yours
Reading tropes such as You Know What You Did
Sure but would his ego not dictate or suggest that entering into a deal like this would not be the best idea? If logic would fail at telling him that he could well lose out might his ego win out?
Hmm this reminds me of something from Rainbow Six, the acronym MICE: money, ideology, conscience, ego. With that in mind what drives Trump? Money? He should be wealthy enough. Ideology? What ideology does Trump have? A clear opposition to other countries and races, what else? Conscience? Conscience made him challenge the NRA and look at taking guns but these days it seems Trump's conscience tells him NATO are the enemy for reasons I'm not quite sure of. Ego would be what most would say defines him and I would agree that he has the ego to think he can win out against Putin and Ill. Especially after last week however would ego also make him think he would not want to look bad? Trump may think he never looks bad, on the other hand he does deeply care what people think of him so would his ego not warn him how his actions would affect that?
Currently reading up My Rule Fu Is Stronger than YoursMoney: Oh no he's totally not wealthy enough, all non-Russian banks have refused to give him loans because he's so unreliable. That's fairly obvious financial incentive for him to care what Russia thinks, they have him by the short hairs.
Ideology: In relation to Putin his ideology is right-wing authoritarianism, he would love to have the power that Putin has and the pseudo-democratic authoritarianism of Russia. Thus he absolutely has a ideological reason to want to cosy up to Russia and behave in a servile manner.
Ego: This one is simple, Trump wants to feel big and important thus when you factor in the ideological factor it makes perfect sense that he'd kiss Putin's ass. Furthermore you're underestimating how delusional he is, anything he does is good and he expects others to agree thus the idea that it might not work is something he will never realize until the consequences are clear.
Edited by Fourthspartan56 on Jul 22nd 2018 at 11:12:48 AM
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji YangIn all likelihood Trump never gave a single thought to Montenegro before that question. The Fox News twit was pitching hima softball question on his anti-iinterventionism by asking why American soldiers should die to protect Montenegro (once again showing that Trumpsters are without souls, or an understanding of how deals actually work) . Trump chose to take it even further by claiming that Montenegro could drag the U.S into a war. Because he’s an idiot with no idea how anything works.
![]()
Trump doesn't have an ideology, really. Yeah, he's definitely an authoritarian, It's not consistant or developed enough to be a true ideology.
A much more likely motavator for his behavior, is ego. Remember, he is a narcissist, and in the end, he's a slave to it.
Edited by megaeliz on Jul 22nd 2018 at 1:03:20 PM
![]()
Yes, his white supremacy and authoritarianism are both consistent so I seriously question the idea that he doesn't have an ideology. It may be vapid and anti-intellectual but it exists.
Don't look to Trump for answers as to why Montenegro. Look to Russia. Always look to Russia.
Montenegro joined NATO in 2016, despite repeated efforts by Russia to prevent them to. Russia even sponsored a coup that was meant to seize control of the government in an attempt to prevent the vote.
Since then, they've been trying to shape a narrative of a corrupt Montenegrin government acting as puppets for NATO to destabilize the Balkans. Russia despises Montenegro for becoming NATO-aligned; there is a very strong likelihood that Montenegro could be the next Crimea.
So. Why Montenegro? Because Trump wants to signal that when Russia comes for them, the United States will not intervene. Trump suggesting that we will not uphold our NATO obligations for Montenegro specifically is a promise to Putin.
Edited by TobiasDrake on Jul 22nd 2018 at 11:34:43 AM
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.I think Trump just singled out Montenegro as an example of "an insignificant Eastern European nation we wouldn't want to go to war to defend". Why Montenegro? Most likely it's the first small Eastern European nation that popped into his head, due to the coverage of him shoving aside the Montenegrin PM last year. Other than maybe Slovenia, but obviously he doesn't want to piss off Melania too much.
x6 Which is funny, because the Ancient White Supremacists of America would've considered the Montenegrins the same stock as the Russians (IE, Slavs), who would've definitively not been white to the WAS Ps of America, and yet modern White Supremacists are aligning with the Russians over the Montenegrins.
I guess to them, some Slavs are more White then others.
x4 Again, Racist Americans 100+ years ago would tell you that the Slavic People's weren't white. And I have a strong suspicion that they'll also start going after certain 'White People' because they aren't the right 'white'.
Edited by DingoWalley1 on Jul 22nd 2018 at 1:43:32 PM
It wasn't just a coup to seize power, it was a coup which had the goal to outright murder all of the current (and democratically elected) leaders of Montenegro. And that's what Nato is for, to protect countries like Montenegro from their bigger neighbours, not just for the sake of said countries, but because those small conflict tend to spiral out of control. Remember how WWI started.

Some of the earliest checks and balances existed to protect slavery as a compromise. I say that as someone who strongly approves on them.
But we need good people writing the laws before good laws can protect against bad politicians.
Edited by CharlesPhipps on Jul 21st 2018 at 9:00:09 AM
Author of The Rules of Supervillainy, Cthulhu Armageddon, and United States of Monsters.