Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Well, that's some very interesting news. Also bad news; like people have said, the Russians have a path out of facing any consequences, and that's making it look like the Democrats bought the midterms from them. Get Hannity screeching about that with even the semblance of evidence, and this country's going to crack right in half.
It's been fun.Russia is truly the dog that caught the car.
The problem are the Greenwald factions of the left who refuse to admit it because they can't have their major theory shaken: Democrats lose because they're too neoliberal and aren't left enough. The primary was rigged, but the election was fair.
Edited by Lightysnake on Jul 19th 2018 at 8:41:05 AM
These hacks use that as an excuse to not vote for them. Because their preferred candidates are so much better.
Disgusted, but not surprisedRight, everyone has weaknesses. But it doesn't look as though they've done a good job of covering for them at this point. Being one of the two major parties mean your weaknesses get a lot more airing, and unlike Republicans, (potential) Democratic voters seem to care.
... it's a bit of a jump in ideas, but it's connected: make it so that potential Democratic voters in a (likely) red state feel like their vote matters. Make it more common for electoral votes to split, or something. Yes there are problems with that, but off the top of my head I can't think of another way to address that, possibly because I'm starting to get tired.
Edited by TroperOnAStickV2 on Jul 19th 2018 at 12:28:38 PM
Hopefully I'll feel confident to change my avatar off this scumbag soon. Apologies to any scumbags I insulted.I'm still resigned to Georgia going red in the next presidential election, and am fully expecting to do a protest vote unless the Democrats make addressing issues I consider important a major part of their platform. Midterms are another story.
Now if electoral votes were more likely to split based on the proportions of votes each party got in a state, that would be another story.
Edited by TroperOnAStickV2 on Jul 19th 2018 at 12:42:30 PM
Hopefully I'll feel confident to change my avatar off this scumbag soon. Apologies to any scumbags I insulted.
I'm not "planning" on anything until we get a concrete idea of who's going to run, what their positions will be, so on. And again, if I lived in a state that was a more likely Democratic pickup I'd see more point in supporting them regardless, as it stands Georgia isn't the deepest of red states so they don't have to go that far to persuade me.
![]()
Loudly support things like universal "free" healthcare and college, campaign finance reform, at the very least modify the superdeligate system... make these issues key.
Hence why I'm more willing to vote in the midterms and for local elections.
Edited by TroperOnAStickV2 on Jul 19th 2018 at 12:56:47 PM
Hopefully I'll feel confident to change my avatar off this scumbag soon. Apologies to any scumbags I insulted.G Georgia has blue areas and purple areas. The governorship is very well within reach for Dems now.
There were seriously people who looked at that outcome and came to the conclusion that Jones "only" winning by a 1.5% (or whatever) was a condemnation of him and the Democrats instead of one of many signs of how Republican Alabama is. People believe what they want to believe.
Edited by LSBK on Jul 19th 2018 at 11:56:50 AM
I've been vocal about my hatred of the "THEIR SIDE BAD!!!!!" mentality, but with the Republican party as it currently exists, I can't conceive of many skeletons in a Democrat's closet, real or imagined, that would justify voting for anyone else, particularly a Republican, who'd be the most likely actual competition.
Edited by sgamer82 on Jul 19th 2018 at 11:02:59 AM
![]()
You already said you were resigned to it. So clearly you are planning to do it.
We don't even know who is going to run in 2020. We haven't even gotten to the primaries. But you're already assuming that whoever it is isn't worth voting for.
Edited by M84 on Jul 20th 2018 at 1:04:05 AM
Disgusted, but not surprisedI just don't get why you're so insistent on this particular talking point. Why even bother talking about protest voting in this climate where the Republican party is taking a collective dump on the country and every vote against them and for a viable candidate is priceless? You can't expect people to react well to that.
Edited by Draghinazzo on Jul 19th 2018 at 1:05:11 PM
![]()
![]()
If I lived in a more likely blue state, yes. As it is they have to make at least a slight effort (which does seem to be underway already, thankfully).
![]()
I'm resigned to the POSSIBILITY, and I wouldn't be if I was in a bluer state.
Edited by TroperOnAStickV2 on Jul 19th 2018 at 1:06:57 PM
Hopefully I'll feel confident to change my avatar off this scumbag soon. Apologies to any scumbags I insulted.

It's not surprising Putin wants to visit the WH. The supervisor needs to do site visits at his employee's workplace after all.
Edited by nightwyrm_zero on Jul 19th 2018 at 10:48:53 AM