Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Of course he is. Can't piss off Sugar Daddy Putin. Maybe Trump thinks this'll square things over the "bombing Syria" faux pas?
Is there any precedent for a high-profile defendant being unable to secure qualified counsel because nobody would represent them?
edited 16th Apr '18 11:27:20 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
A slate article
clearly written before that broke, said that "Somewhere out there, at this exact moment, a guy is thinking very, very hard about the best way to break some delicate news to his wife. " Could we be lucky enough to see this end the Hannity show on Faux News?
Relevant bit from a live tweet
of the hearing:
"If he can't disclose the client name, even to the court under seal..." Mc Kay asks how the government can contest an overbroad claim of privilege.
"There's nothing improper about the way the search warrants were executed in this case," Mc Kay says, slamming Cohen's Fourth Amendment claim as "frivolous."
Quoting this line from Cohen's letter about "attacks on the impartiality of the Justice Department and the USAO," Mc Kay notes the irony that I pointed out early.
Cohen and Trump both made "inflammatory" attacks on that search, Mc Kay said.
Cohen's other attorney Steve Ryan says the third client is a "publicly prominent individual," and he didn't want the name to be released from the public. "We are protecting that persons identity, but not from the court," he claims, if there will be a sealed in camera review.
Jargon explanation: In camera = for the judge's eyes alone. Judge Wood wants to know the "legal grounds" for withholding the client's name.
After commenting on Cohen's responsibilities, Ryan says: "I'm simply trying to protect the privacy of that individual."
An attorney for the press objects, notes that the public also has a right. That attorney's name is Robert Balin, who reads a citation indicating that a client's fear of guilt by association is not enough to prevent disclosure.
The reason this is so, Balin says, is, "So that We the People, and the press, can monitor our institutions."
Dramatic buildup here.
As noted, Judge Wood made her ruling on disclosure, but no name yet. They're arguing about a privilege log.
Todd Harrison is up now.
Judge Wood: "I understand that he doesn't want his name out there, but that's not enough under the law."
"The client's name is Sean Hannity"
edited 16th Apr '18 12:30:21 PM by megaeliz
https://whatthefuckjusthappenedtoday.com/2018/04/16/day-452/
Day 452: Morally unfit.
1/ James Comey called Trump "morally unfit to be president" and likened "the loyalty oaths" to a mob boss at "the dominant center of everything" who is doing "tremendous damage" to institutional and cultural norms. In his Sunday interview with George Stephanopoulos, Comey said that it is "possible, but I don't know" if Russia has compromising information on Trump. (ABC News / Reuters)
Annotated excerpts from James Comey's "20/20" interview. (New York Times)
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/15/us/politics/comey-abc-interview-excerpts.html
2/ Trump tweeted that Comey is a "not smart," "self serving" liar, who deserves jail for being the "WORST FBI Director in history, by far." Th tweets came hours before Comey's interview aired. Trump also insisted that Comey's memos are "FAKE!" while doubling down on calling the former FBI director a "Slimeball!" Trump also charged that the only reason Comey reopened the Clinton email investigation in the final days of the 2016 election was because he wanted a job in her administration. Trump added: "I never asked Comey for Personal Loyalty." (Washington Post)
3/ Trump continued his Twitter attacks on Comey, accusing the former FBI director of lying to Congress and having "committed many crimes!" Trump did not specify what crimes he believed Comey and others have committed. (New York Times)
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/16/us/politics/trump-comey-clinton.html
4/ Trump asked a federal judge to block the Justice Department from viewing evidence seized during raids on Michael Cohen's office, home, and hotel. Trump's attorneys argued that some of the evidence seized from Cohen should first be reviewed by Trump, not federal prosecutors in New York who are investigating Cohen, because some of the materials may involve attorney-client privilege. (Bloomberg / Washington Post)
5/ Trump wants the power to hire and fire all "officers of the United States" who "exercise significant authority" under the law. Trump's Solicitor General Noel Francisco intervened in a minor SEC case to urge the Supreme Court to clarify the president's constitutional "power to oversee executive officers through removal." The move comes as Trump has repeatedly claimed that he has the power to fire special prosecutor Robert Mueller. Francisco could also be in line to oversee the Mueller probe if Rod Rosenstein is fired. (Los Angeles Times)
http://www.latimes.com/politics/la-na-pol-court-trump-fire-20180415-story.html
6/ Paul Ryan: "I don't think it's necessary" to pass a bill to protect Robert Mueller from being fired by Trump. "I don't think he's going to fire Mueller." Hundreds of former Justice Department employees, meanwhile, are urging Congress to "swiftly and forcefully respond" should Trump fire Mueller. (NBC News / Washington Post)
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/paul-ryan-not-necessary-bring-bill-protect-mueller-n866086
7/ Michael Cohen used the same Delaware LLC to handle the payoffs to Stormy Daniels and a former Playboy model who alleged Elliott Broidy impregnated her. Federal prosecutors are examining money flowing in and out of Essential Consultants as part of a broad investigation into Cohen's activities to silence women with allegations against Trump or those near him. Separately, Cohen also killed a 2013 story where Us Weekly was going to report a story about Donald Trump Jr. having an affair with one of the singers in the group "Dumblonde." (Wall Street Journal)
8/ Trump's 2020 reelection campaign has spent about 22% of its fundraising on legal fees related to the ongoing special counsel investigation and a legal challenge by Stormy Daniels. The campaign also spent about $125,000 at Trump businesses, including Trump International Hotel, Trump restaurants, and Trump Tower. (Washington Post / Buzz Feed News)
poll/ 56% of Americans disapprove of Trump's job performance, versus 40% who approve. Those who strongly disapprove outnumber those who strongly approve by nearly 2-1. (ABC News)
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/economy-helps-trump-approval-personality-women-poll/story?id=54445035
poll/ 47% of voters want a Democratic-controlled Congress, compared to 40% who prefer a GOP-controlled Congress – down from the Democrats' 10-point edge in March. (NBC News)
Notables.
Trump tried to block Pence's national security adviser appointment. After Trump learned that Pence was bringing on Nikki Haley's deputy, Jon Lerner, Trump told Kelly to get rid of Lerner. (Axios)
Jon Lerner stepped down two days after being named Pence's new national security aide. Trump was told – in error – that Lerner was a "Never Trumper," which caused him to boil over. Lerner offered to withdraw "to minimize the amount of conflict and internal drama." (Reuters)
The Pentagon said there has been a "2,000% increase in Russian trolls in the last 24 hours," following the airstrikes against Syria on Friday night. (Axios)
https://www.axios.com/russian-bots-increase-2195bf68-567c-4466-a705-17e69d4b6cad.html
The Trump administration walked back Nikki Haley's announcement that the U.S. Treasury plans to issue additional sanctions on Russia following the chemical weapons attack in Syria last week. "We are considering additional sanctions on Russia and a decision will be made in the near future," Sarah Huckabee Sanders said. (The Hill)
Scott Pruitt's $43,000 secure "privacy booth" violated spending laws, the Government Accountability Office said. Pruitt told a congressional committee he needed the booth to make secure calls to the White House and discuss classified information, but he was unable to tell the lawmakers how often he would use it. (ABC News / Bloomberg / Washington Post)
As much as I hate Hannity (especially when he peddled that 'Clinton killed the DNC leaker' Conspiracy theory), does revealing his name as a Client of Cohen actually do anything other then make him look slightly shadier? (Really hard to do, considering he's so shady he's completely pitch black at this point.)
Will it actually tie him to a potential crime? If it could, that'd be fantastic. Otherwise, I don't know what revealing his name would actually do...
And look what Hannity tweeted:
From a friend's twitter
DO YOU THINK HE KNOWS HE WAS DOXXED IN COURT
I should call into his show.. pretend to have a valid disgusting alt right question or statement. Then hit him with some hard trump cohen troll material..
ANY IDEAS?
So anyone have any ideas of Alt Right questions I can suggest?
edited 16th Apr '18 1:09:48 PM by megaeliz
I don't really have any material to help you troll Hannity, however noble that cause may be.
edited 16th Apr '18 1:09:11 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"The actual purpose to Cohen disclosing his list of clients is because he's currently under investigation for potentially illegal activities, meaning anybody else he's represented could be suspect in similar crimes/cover-ups. Despite what the stupid alt-righters say, this investigation is mainly focused on Cohen's wrongdoings, potentially tied into Trump's wrongdoings, so it can easily branch out from there to whatever Cohen did involving his other clients.
By itself, Hannity's connection to Cohen doesn't incriminate him, but it does give a potential lead to investigators if they care to look.
Yep. This investigation is independent of the Mueller investigation and focuses on Cohen's personal criminal behavior. If it sweeps up illegal behavior by others, well... them's the breaks, as they say.
The point of seizing all of Cohen's documents without letting him assert attorney-client privilege was, at least in part, to determine if those documents implicate him or his clients in criminal acts, which negates any claim of privilege. It's so beautiful. And Cohen's argument that he ought to have been able to decide which documents to hand over seems like it's being laughed out of court.
edited 16th Apr '18 1:27:03 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
I'd argue that there's two separate investigations going on. There's the one being pursued in New York, and the one relating to his alleged role into the Russia affair. Remember that Mueller reportedly has proof that Cohen was in Prague, which confirms another piece of the Dossier. Allegedly, he meant with a Russian Oligarch, and Ukrainian Hackers, so logically, the next thing to find out, is if that is also true. (Although he might already know.)
I imagine they will be turning over any documents relevant to his alleged dealings with Russia specifically, over to Mueller.
edited 16th Apr '18 1:42:22 PM by megaeliz
I think it's some sort of hiring requirement to work at Fox News.
Have you (a) sexually harassed a co-worker, (b) cheated on your spouse? If both questions are answered "no", reject application.
For female applicants, it's: Are you willing to put up with persistent sexual harassment without suing or going public?
edited 16th Apr '18 1:50:36 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"

Washington Post says Trump is walking back from new Russia sanctions that Haley announced at the UN yesterday.
edited 16th Apr '18 11:24:24 AM by Parable