Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
And, oh, will you look at that, an UPS employee has had enough and started shooting as well
.
People got hurt. It sucks.
There, we talked about it. That is the extent to which it can be talked about, because deliberations do not help the victims of a shooting. Emergency response and medical treatment does.
Politicians are not emergency responders. They do not have the training, the knowledge, or the qualifications to personally go out and provide medical treatment to the injured. Their job is to take what happened and say, "What lessons can we take away from this and how can we shape our country in such a manner as to reduce the probability of this ever happening again?"
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Another one I'm not sure how to take
From Rand Paul's Twitter
:
edited 14th Jun '17 10:04:03 AM by sgamer82
The way you should take that is that on June 23, 2016, Obama was still President and everyone was pretty sure Clinton would thrash Trump and Dems would continue holding the Presidency for the next four years. Thus, Rand Paul engaging in the same pro-gun sabre-rattling Republicans love doing.
They're very well-trained at being an opposition party. It's why they suck so hard at being the majority.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.I just hope the people who say it's disrespectful to make political hay out of a mass shooting by calling for gun control are equally upset at Republican representative Chris Collins, who barely waited until the shooting was over to blame democrats for the shooting
.
"I can only hope that the Democrats do tone down the rhetoric," Collins told WBEN. "The rhetoric has been outrageous ... the finger-pointing, just the tone and the angst and the anger directed at Donald Trump, his supporters."
Collins said that it was inevitable someone was going to act based on the "rhetoric" toward President Trump and the GOP.
"You know, some people react to things like that. They get angry as well. And then you fuel the fires," said Collins, who is among the most vocal Trump backers on Capitol Hill.
A police spokeswoman said the shooter was in the hospital after being shot by police. Collins said Democrats should take the attack as a "wake-up call."
"Maybe this is a wake-up call. I'm not saying it will be," Collins continued. "But let's hope we could disagree on a more polite, conversational basis and not do things like what they did at my office a couple weeks ago."
Protesters held a "die-in" at Collins's office last week to protest the GOP efforts to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act. Collins said the move went "too far."
Y'know, since they're only upset about things getting politicized.
edited 14th Jun '17 10:11:11 AM by TheWanderer
| Wandering, but not lost. | If people bring so much courage to this world...◊ |Guys, this is standard GOP rhetoric. From 2016. Check the timestamp on that Tweet. It is not a response to this shooting.
Republicans like to bandy the Second Amendment around as a veiled threat. "I'm not saying we NEED to start shooting up the government, I'm just saying that everyone needs to have lots of guns just in case Democrats - whoops, I mean, "somebody" ever tries to accumulate too much power."
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.On an entirely different note:
I somehow doubt that the US population notices because the press is barely covering this, but this is already the third time since Trump took office that a military action in the middle east lead by the US coalition ended up with an obscene high number of civilians dying. While Trump is playing the clown (has he already managed to mention his birthday and make the shooting all about him personally?) the US coalition has apparently lost every bit of inhibition and doesn't care how many end up in the cross-fire as long as they get to the terrorists, too. This won't end well.
![]()
Yes, we know. (Or at least I assume we all know.) We're just pointing out the GOP attitudes.
That's another reason why I don't like the way the Trump administration has virtually abandoned civilian oversight of the military.
edited 14th Jun '17 10:14:44 AM by TheWanderer
| Wandering, but not lost. | If people bring so much courage to this world...◊ |Oh please don't pull this crap.
How many Muslims, gays, women, and racial minorities were murdered due to right wing extremism? WHERE was the call for unity and respect then? Especially from the right?
Where were the call for finding consolation when Rand Paul, Sarah Palin, and Donald Trump used dog whistles to get their followers in rowdy fit and go on a shooting spree? And even then, the Republicans are currently blaming the entire Democratic party on this one idiot, who wanted Sanders to join the fucking Greens.
But this is ONLY the second time a far left yahoo pulled this crap and suddenly there's a call for unity?
Bull fucking shit! The Democrats have been calling for solutions, i.e. proper gun control, for YEARS now. Meanwhile with Republicans, it's still "lalalala can't hear you and it would be shame if you were suddenly gunned down now." It's even more insulting because no one died in this shooting.
Oh but don't call for unity when 9 black people get slaughtered in a church. Or when mosques are set on fire. Or when a yahoo goes on a shooting because women won't sleep with him.
edited 14th Jun '17 10:16:44 AM by NoName999
For the Charleston shooting, people forget Nikki Haley and other Republicans who came to unify with others to remember their fellow lawmaker, who was a pastor.
The thing is about gun control solutions is that sometimes those solutions can be seen as tone deaf, especially in places where there are strong gun control laws but they still got their hands on it.
Also that guy who killed people who didn't sleep with him was not inspired by any political leanings, so blaming him on the Republicans is not useful.
I also believe saying it's only the second time downplays the fact that Berkely and many other places where left wing extremists have pulled these kinds of violent stunts would beg to differ it's a right wing problem only.
Also it's not all the Republicans blaming it on the entire Democrats, but only one Republican lawmaker.
edited 14th Jun '17 10:28:14 AM by firewriter
Didn't I just say cut that crap out.
The situations are nowhere near the same. Obama, Clinton, Sanders, and the rest of the left wing are NOT the ones who gets their base in a frenzy with violent dogwhistles.
It's Sarah "Don't retreat! Instead - RELOAD" Palin It's Donald "Hillary should worry about the 2nd Amendment people" Trump It's Fox "They're stealing your money and killing babies" News.
One leftist nut does not equate to all the times right wing nuts killed someone.
And ignore all of that for a moment. Right now, it's the Republicans who are using this shooting to antagonize the Democrats. So why aren't you sticking up for the Dems now?
I have seen only one Republican, and that is it. However, to say it's the whole party is incorrect and dismisses how a lot of Republicans seem to be leaning on their Democratic counterparts for emotional support as well.
edited 14th Jun '17 10:31:06 AM by firewriter
Be specific. Dylann Roof was permitted to own a gun due to a loophole requiring that all background checks be completed in 3 days. The Isla Vista shooter's guns were legally purchased and registered because there is no such thing as an "Are You Batshit" test before you are permitted to own a gun.
The GOP's stance on women legitimized the Isla Vista shooter's attitude towards women. "Submit or die"? Sounds awfully familiar.
@No Name 999, could you actually provide a source for that ONLY SECOND thing you keep repeating? Your point about right wing related terrorism being much more common can be made without making such a bold claim, and just expecting us to accept it.
@Firewriter, this situation and all mass-shooting attempts are already politicized, but the Democrats aren't the ones doing it. Going "How can we make it so things like this happen less often?" is not politicizing things. Going "This happened because of Democrats" most certainly is. The two things are not the same, no matter how much you try and paint them as such.
Thank you. Though, it really doesn't answer the specific claim.
edited 14th Jun '17 10:48:58 AM by LSBK
Goes beyond that even. Rodger identified as incel, which is a warped right-wing ideology all of its own. Most of the incel sites are currently all aboard the Trump train, and while he wasn't running for office back when Rodger did the shooting, the incel crowd had already embraced many of his predecessors, as well as birtherism.
Divorcing Rodger from the misogyny of the hard right is impossible, because the misogyny of the hard right not only informs the incel ideology but is entirely wrapped up with it. As the alt-right has become a thing, the incels have staked out a position on the fringes of it, in places where even Richard Spencer fears to tread, have canonized Rodger as "Saint Elliot", and have tried to push their worship of him into other places in the alt-right. They've made common cause with the Neo-Nazis in the name of fighting "Tyrone" and that process was underway even before Rodger's spree.
Long story short, anybody who wants to claim Rodger isn't a product of right-wing politics is going to have to try very hard to make that argument.
Don't you know that those university kids wouldn't let poor Milo speak? They're suppressing free speech. Clearly it heralds the beginning of a Communist takeover. Or so FOX has told me.
edited 14th Jun '17 10:45:09 AM by AmbarSonofDeshar
Let's be honest though, this became political the instant the guy opened fire. There are reports that he was asking whether it was Republican or Democratic congressmen before he started shooting. He went to a place they would be grouped together in the open with reduced security. If any GOP congresspeople had been killed who here can honestly say they would be sad for him? (A few maybe but not everybody). For his family, maybe. For staffers and bystanders hurt, maybe. And people would denounce the shooter. But I don't think you would be mourning the congressman any more the peasants mourned Louis XVI as he went to the guillotine.

We're talking about exactly what we should be talking about, and your plea about "people are hurting" isn't fooling anyone.