Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
If moderate Republicans currently have any power or relevancy in their party that's news to me. They got marginalized first by the Tea Party, then by the Trump fanboys. You want to make statements defending them? Back it up. Where are the efforts of these so-called moderates to fight Trump and his Russian backers? For that matter, if, as you previously suggested, they think the scary liberals are more of a threat to the nation then Putin, are they really moderates?
As others in the thread have noted again and again, guys like McCain and Graham might talk a good game on standing up to Trump, but they're a little light on action. I'm supposed to believe they care because they offer a verbal condemnation, then go right back to ignoring the problem? I think I'll quote Joe Biden on this—"show me something".
As for the rest both sider-ism is not open mindedness, and I can't think of a scenario when the Democrats have ever behaved the way the Republicans currently are. If you can, I'm all ears.
edited 16th May '17 10:16:58 AM by AmbarSonofDeshar
![]()
![]()
Structurally, nothing without a concerted long-term effort.
My favored options are:
1.) Severely tilt the Electoral College system so that the Northeast and the West Coast have absolute power in determining the shape and membership of the government.
2.) Institute a civil service test, with an ideal fail-rate of 99%, to restrict political office to a select coterie of politicians and intellectually-minded people.
So long as Flyover Country or the Deep South can throw its weight around on the national stage, this will happen again.
edited 16th May '17 10:13:41 AM by CrimsonZephyr
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."![]()
I'd be all for getting rid of gerrymandering and the E.C. itself. But that's not likely to happen.
![]()
![]()
It is not a coincidence that most if not all of the moderate Republicans who actually have the guts to scream out that the Emperor has no clothes are not ones who hold office.
edited 16th May '17 10:17:28 AM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprisedI was hoping we could avoid actively trying to disenfranchise sections of the populace.
But I find the argument that this had happened before unsatisfying. I really don't want to have to come back to this. Our democracy is getting undermined enough.
Drastic measures of some sort do need to be considered.
edited 16th May '17 10:20:01 AM by bobwolf
![]()
Getting rid of the E.C., and thus making the popular vote actually worth something might help. At the very least, polling would be less of a pain in the ass and more reliable.
Guess Spicer can look forward to spending less time in the bushes and more time complaining about Dippin' Dots on social media again.
edited 16th May '17 10:23:47 AM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprised
I mean, it'd have prevented Trump's election which means I'm for it 100%. But the GOP, the conservative media, the republican voters all are pretty badly failing at this moment. And getting rid of Trump won't change that underlying problem that one of our political factions has stopped seeing reality. I'm looking for anything that'd give me hope that they won't do this again, and I'm struggling to find it.
Donald Trump is such a bad spy, he encrypts all his data with the password "12345."
Donald Trump is such a bad spy, all his dead drops are clearly marked.
Donald Trump is such a bad spy, he reuses the same one-time pad for all his decryptions.
"Trump, Donald Trump."
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."@Zephyr, @wolf: That's absolutely not something that would probably backfire at some point in the future. It also feels more like an excuse to indulge in authoritarian power fantasies rather than a actual solution to the problems highlighted by the 2016 election. Trump was not a failure of democracy, he's exactly the opposite: the failure of a system designed to limit democracy allegedly as a bulwark against the tyranny of the masses. In actuality, such systems ultimately function as a means of safeguarding the position and property of privileged classes of people, in the case of the electoral college that means white rural landowners.
edited 16th May '17 10:42:08 AM by CaptainCapsase
![]()
That's amazing! I have the same combination on my luggage!
edited 16th May '17 10:41:28 AM by sgamer82
The problem is not that republicans dosent care about the country, is that they think THEY are the country, liberals are ungrafull people who engange in unamerican behivor, while republicans love the country because...well because they said so, this creare the idea that EVERYTHING they do is for the good of the country
This is not just tribalism but moral myopia, things are good because we do it and we do it because they are good.
"My Name is Bolt, Bolt Crank and I dont care if you believe or not"Well, probably the number 1 priority to preventing "another Trump" is to get dark money out of politics. This means passing laws that require the discloser of donors above a certain amount, the return of the equal time rule and the fairness doctrine during elections, the creation of an independent commission to oversee redistricting, and, eventually, an amendment to the Constitution that overturns Buckley vs. Valeo and the Citizens United Supreme Court decisions.
I'm done trying to sound smart. "Clear" is the new smart.I love Emo Trump. (I'm having a hard time embedding so): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BlD8Uzpbi08
this is about the failing New York Times, Not as good as the Speeches one, but still fun
edited 16th May '17 10:55:08 AM by megaeliz
![]()
That wouldn't stop another Trump; Clinton vastly outspent Trump and consequently got far more dark money than he did. It's something that's important to do because the fundraising arms race is toxic to our democratic institutions.
As far as money in politics, we can't limit donations without amending the constitution, but it might be possible to cap campaign spending, which is typically how things are handled in European democracies, if I recall correctly.
edited 16th May '17 10:49:07 AM by CaptainCapsase
@Unknowing: A lot of them are convinced that people like you and me are a greater threat to our nation than Russia, mostly because Russia isn't shooting at us. We may regard that as profoundly wrong-headed, but the point is that they believe it, so they are being patriotic from their own point of view.
They way to fix this is to make sure that our own national defense policies are clear and well known. Liberals and Progressives are patriots too, and we can prove it.
@Captain: The problem isn't campaign spending, it's issue advertising by "independent" political action groups, which just happens to be aligned with one candidate's platform. The Republicans get far more of this than the Democrats, most elections.
edited 16th May '17 10:51:01 AM by DeMarquis
I'm done trying to sound smart. "Clear" is the new smart.The source of the secret intelligence that Trump gave to the Russians: Israel
Israel is one of the United States’ most important allies and a major intelligence collector in the Middle East. The revelation that Mr. Trump boasted about some of Israel’s most sensitive information to the Russians could damage the relationship between the two countries. It also raises the possibility that the information could be passed to Iran, Russia’s close ally and Israel’s main threat in the Middle East.
....
The officials, who were not authorized to discuss the matter and spoke on the condition of anonymity, said that Israel previously had urged the United States to be careful about the handling of the intelligence that Mr. Trump discussed.
....
Former officials said it was not uncommon for presidents to unintentionally say too much in meetings and said that in administrations from both parties, staff members typically established bright lines for their bosses to avoid crossing before such meetings.
Israel’s concerns about the Trump White House’s handling of classified information were foreshadowed in the Israeli news media earlier this year. Newspapers there reported in January that American officials warned their Israeli counterparts to be careful about what they told the Trump administration because it could be leaked to the Russians, given Mr. Trump’s openness toward President Vladimir V. Putin.
Bonus points since officials already told Israel to not share sensitive information with Trump
edited 16th May '17 10:59:15 AM by NoName999

@Septimus: I doubt it. We should build on our strengths.
@Ambar: If moderate Republicans dont care about national security, it's news to me. And thank you for highlighting my attempt to be open-minded and treat opposing viewpoints with some degree of respect. Coming from you, that is a surprising, but appreciated compliment.
@Bobwolf: I dont know how to keep people from electing incompetent idiots, other than pointing out to them the consequences of voting for incompetent idiots. We can all hope that the current circus show speaks for itself.
edited 16th May '17 10:11:02 AM by DeMarquis
I'm done trying to sound smart. "Clear" is the new smart.