Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Capitalism -> State Capitalism-> Socialism
So the idea is that Capitalism is economic oligarchy and you need to transition from the private sector owning the means of production to State Capitalism where the state owns the means of production to Socialism where the workers own the means of production.
I don't think any country ever gets past the State Capitalism phase.
I mean that is a straight up fascist sentiment. The idea that to be a good American you have to root for your president.
Did you root for Bush?
edited 2nd May '17 3:07:34 PM by MadSkillz
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I feel like you should "root" for the president in the hopes that they actually end up doing some good, whatever your affiliation, but when you have someone like Trump, who's made it clear that most things are about his ego and spite, and most of the things he wants to do just aren't feasible, I don't see how it makes you a "bad American" to be happy that the bad things he wants to do aren't being done (for the most part, anyway).
edited 2nd May '17 3:08:55 PM by LSBK
![]()
Oh, no. I didn't care about Bush. I didn't care about politics as much back then. I know that a lot of people in Bush's cabinet were corrupt.
I get tired of Trump supporters saying that not supporting him makes you a "bad" American, like they're the only "true" Americans, because Trump is gonna stick it to The Man, man.
I wouldn't be surprised if it all turns out to be The Man Is Sticking It to the Man.
edited 2nd May '17 3:17:18 PM by BearyScary
Do not obey in advance.![]()
No True Scotsman is a logical fallacy. It's entirely possible to be patriotic and love your country, while having no love for the government and/or the officials/party currently in power. And that is not doublethink.
edited 2nd May '17 3:45:23 PM by pwiegle
This Space Intentionally Left Blank.I agree. No True Scotsman is a terrible line of thinking when applied to just about everything, even fandoms.
Do not obey in advance.I don't think pure socialism can work either, but I disagree that financial incentives are the only reason people would strive to accomplish things. Just a quick glance around this very website should reveal how powerful the innate human desire to create is, but even if you discount that, people can easily be motivated by non-material things like prestige. It's not a secret that a large percentage of the population desires fame just as much, if not more than, money. As long as we celebrate people for their accomplishments, I don't see why that wouldn't motivate them just as much as money. Isn't half the point of being rich just to publicly show off your success anyway? IE: Conspicuous Consumption.
edited 2nd May '17 4:13:34 PM by Clarste
So in slightly more uplifting news, Jimmy Kimmel shared his experience dealing with his son's congenital heart defect last week.
The reason I'm posting it here is that he brings it around to the health insurance debate in the last 2 1/2 minutes, capping it with this.
If your baby is going to die, and it doesn’t have to, it shouldn’t matter how much money you make. I think that’s something that, whether you’re a Republican or a Democrat or something else, we all agree on that, right?”
edited 2nd May '17 4:16:30 PM by ironballs16
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"
Thankfully he's an ex-Congressman, riding the Tea Party wave into (and out of) Congress, 2011-2013.
Though I will say, this is one of those odd exceptions where he literally put his money where his mouth is as he apparently rejected his healthcare package as a congressperson
even though it would've covered his wife's pre-existing condition. So while I abhor his values, I can at least respect the fact that he adheres to them so strongly.
If anyone asks you why the Civil War happened, here are the official reasons each state seceded in 4 nice graphs:
It's interesting Louisiana and North Carolina gave no reason in their official documents, and Tennessee said we have no opinion, we are just seceding.
"We're all paper, we're all scissors, we're all fightin' with our mirrors, scared we'll never find somebody to love."Oh, they were very clear over the slavery thing.
It's just that after the war, the South began to try to reinvent itself from the guys who were literally planning to invade South America to spread and preserve slavery./ It helped that Alexander "Cornerstone Speech" Stephens was a guy helping to literally write the textbooks.
To be honest, I'm sympathetic to the idea of "why shouldn't States just be able to leave the Union when they no longer feel that it's benefiting them?" That doesn't mean I'd support them leaving, but it's not clear to me why they shouldn't have that right, in the same sense that the UK has the right to leave the EU.
That said, the Civil War was about the Southern states defending their right to keep slaves.
You don't get to utilise the right to self determination when keeping slaves, when you're denying much of your population the right to self determination you can't claim it yourself because yirue actively denying your population that right.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranThe four states that rebelled after Fort Sumter rebelled essentially because, without the rest of the slaver states backing them up in Congress, the Union became insanely lopsided in favor of free states. Which meant they could introduce more and more emancipation oriented legislation and the slavers who ruled over what was left of the American South would see their wealth and political power gradually diminished.
A slave power Virginia without the South would face decreasing influence in the face of growing New York and Ohio. A slave power Virginia as part of the Confederacy would regain its position as the most influential state.
![]()
That's a fine and dandy after-the-fact moral rationalization, but it doesn't change the fact that any state isn't legally allowed to secede for any reason. If, for example, the situations had been reversed and the North had wanted to secede because they found the slavery of the South morally repugnant, there would would have been exactly as much legal justification for starting a civil war.
And of course in the modern day we can't seriously talk about California or New York seceding from a hyper-conservative USA that doesn't represent their culture and beliefs. Because that'd just be another civil war, and no one wants that.
edited 2nd May '17 5:18:47 PM by Clarste

Interesting, I've never experienced that feeling.
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang