Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
The resistance school actually will have a webinar next week on how to sustain the movement and make lasting change.
Readings: https://www.resistanceschool.com/readings-week-four/
edited 28th Apr '17 8:02:44 AM by megaeliz
That was more or less true with the Demorcats as well when they had a super majority in Obama's first years, with the Blue Dogs siding with Republicans on varies things like the ACA and such.
Of course, the Dems were nowhere near as dysfunctional then as the Republicans are now, but it's easy to forget that both parties have their factions with their own independent interest.
x4 So, is he a Global Nationalist, or a National Globalist?
x3 There are tons of Political Movements that are complete opposites mashed together in weird ways. Like Socialist Anarchy, Christian Communism, Non-Sovereign Monarchy, etc. Global Nationalism (or National Globalism) would be just one of those movements.
Either way, this will scare off a lot of Trump's supporters who were against Globalism (and "Globalism").
edited 28th Apr '17 8:36:47 AM by DingoWalley1
![]()
Neither Socialist Anarchy or Christian Communism are very weird. Socialism is the workers owning the means of production and anarchy is the replacement of hierarchy with local direct democracy (more or less) so combining the two is hardly contradictory.
And Communism is simply an ideology that advocates for reaching the stateless, classless Utopia of Communism, thus being Christian while advocating for that isn't impossible.
edited 28th Apr '17 8:43:32 AM by Fourthspartan56
"Einstein would turn over in his grave. Not only does God play dice, the dice are loaded." -Chairman Sheng-Ji Yang
Communism is generally assumed to have a secular/atheist bent due to what Marxist wrote about religion in the manifesto. It's hard to divorce Communism from Marx so it's understandable that Christian Communism may seem like a contradiction.
Socialist Anarchy on the other hand is really not that strange at all since that is ultimately the end goal of Marxism and Anarcho-Syndicalism.
I can't be surprised at this. That talk with the Chinese President seems to have rattled him. I suspect it consisted mostly of him learning Geopolitics 101 from the person who might just be the most fit man on Earth to teach Trump: Kim Jong-Un's babysitter.
Trump isn't the first President to do an about face on a populist ideal once he entered office. This happened with Obama and surveillance too. He campaigned on less surveillance, got into office, and started raising surveillance. At the time, people were livid, ranting about how Obama had lied and was a traitor to his principles and stuff.
But what it boils down to is that, holy shit you guys, being President is really, really hard. There's a lot of stuff that the common person just doesn't know about the job. On the campaign trail, you get to say whatever you want because you don't need to actually care about the logistics of making it work. As we've discussed, that's why Bernie's so beloved: he gets to make wild promises without having to figure out how they could be carried out.
But once you're sitting in that chair, suddenly you're learning all these things you never knew before and having to face the ugly reality of them. You don't get to just go, "We're gonna make a better plan than Obamacare." You have to actually figure out what that means. You have to do the politicking of getting it through. You don't get the luxury of simply having opinions anymore; you need to have plans.
Washington changes people. By the nature of the job, dreamers are forced to become pragmatists. Trump entered the office as a dreamer. He still desperately wants to be. But the longer he spends there, the more he discovers how little he actually knows.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.I'm guessing that Trump really wants to be part of the global elite, but he's surrounded by people who say that nationalism is good. So he assumes being both is better.
I highly doubt he's aware of the "globalist" dogwhistle.
There is one thing I'll say about the Chinese president. While he's borderline authoritarian and is in control of a deeply scary regime, I'm pretty sure that he actually does genuinely care about China. Maybe not individual people, but the country and culture as a whole, yes.
edited 28th Apr '17 8:56:08 AM by Zendervai
What Trump wants is a pat on the back for making "right" decisions. He's trying to find the Victory Condition. The decision so right, so indisputably correct, that it makes the whole nation drop to our knees and praise his wise and gracious choices.
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.![]()
![]()
![]()
I agree with the rest of your comment but Xi is not a borderline authoritarian, he rules a thoroughly authoritarian state so I would say he is unquestionably an authoritarian. Just a minor question of terminology.

Gee, I wonder why.
Disgusted, but not surprised