Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
x6 Trump and his stupidity could literally turn Utah gray (IE, Voting for Independents, or even Libertarians), or even turn it Sanders' Blue.
The whole South West could become the new Blue Wall to replace the decaying Midwest by 2024. And with Texas slowly becoming a Purple State, that would not bode well for the Republican Party.
edited 26th Apr '17 7:31:33 PM by DingoWalley1
@Elle Well I wasn't joking. I was making a point that each group has a different word for when they mean elite and the word they use is based on their mindset.
So the alt-right would say it's da joos because they're neo-nazis.
Republicans would call them the coastal liberal elite.
Democrats tend to go with 1 %ers or sometimes old white men.
Far leftists call them capitalists and plutocrats.
Etc.
edited 26th Apr '17 7:36:40 PM by MadSkillz
Concerning a Southwest Wall, maybe it'll be blue in another decade or two.
The thing about Arizona and Texas, in contrast to California, is that the white people there are pretty conservative and a chunk of the immigrant community don't have citizenship and the right to vote.
edited 26th Apr '17 7:40:16 PM by MadSkillz
Whatever you meant, the way you wrote it in the context you wrote it is, to borrow a phrase, terrible optics. I'm not accusing you but it would be best if you edited the post and be adequately contrite about it.
Arizona more than Texas. Texas has much stronger urban blue pockets and a couple cities have attracted some of the Silicon Valley demographic.
edited 26th Apr '17 7:46:06 PM by Elle
Speaking of Texas, Senate Bill 4 has been passed and will now enable police officers to question detained individuals about their immigration status
. Yes, children included.
![]()
![]()
And well, Hispanics don't split nearly as strongly in favor of democrats as African Americans. Fuck, IIRC Trump actually improved on Mitt Romney's share of the Hispanic vote as impossible as that sounds, it's entirely there's every possibility a future GOP candidate will be more successful at the party brass's goal of bringing Hispanics into their coalition, perhaps in the same way Italians and Irish Americans gradually went from being an other to simply being "white."
edited 26th Apr '17 7:46:50 PM by CaptainCapsase
AP breaking: Trump decides not to terminate NAFTA, will renegotiate.
https://twitter.com/AP/status/857424342971547648
edited 26th Apr '17 7:49:43 PM by tclittle
"We're all paper, we're all scissors, we're all fightin' with our mirrors, scared we'll never find somebody to love."Well the Republican Party tried to pivot to Latinos in the primary.
Jeb was their golden boy and Marco Rubio was their back up.
I already know who the Republican Party is going to prop up.
With how the Republican Party is decaying, George P. would fit better as a Libertarian then a Republican.
I also don't think a Hispanic/Latino Republican will ever have a chance at getting the Nomination from said Party, especially with Trump's Victory...
And he got 0 States! And Rubio only got Minnesota, Guam and DC. True, Ted Cruz got a few States, but I'm willing to chalk him up as an anomaly, and even then, he got decimated by Trump.
edited 26th Apr '17 8:00:01 PM by DingoWalley1
@ Ambar Sonof Deshar (184988): "Which says nothing about which politicians, if any, are actually on the payroll. Mad Skillz has been trying to claim that Obama was controlled by Wall Street, but has offered exactly zero evidence to back up that assertion..."
I'll just say what I said here
: "...The problem with our political system isnt the corruption of individual politicians, it's with the system itself... When we say "Money out of Politics" we are saying that it's the money which is the problem, not corrupt individuals in office (were that the case, we could just vote them out and problem solved). Try calling Bernie Sanders office and see if you can get him personally on the phone. Now donate a million dollars to his favorite cause or charity, and then see if he takes your call. He better, or the people who depend on that charity are going to suffer. That's the kind of corruption we are talking about- large donations create opportunities for influence that ordinary people (even masses of them) generally do not get...."
It's not Obama or Sanders or Clinton or even the Republican Party. It's the system they all built and help sustain.
I'm done trying to sound smart. "Clear" is the new smart.Lot of libertarians are in the Republican Party.
Beside George P Bush is being set up as a candidate for 16 years later when Latinos become a lot more important of a group. Not in the near future.
So they'll trade in some whites for more Latinos.
@ Physical Stamina: "But I thought it was Trump supporters that were the weebs here."
Lol, fuck that. I ain't no trump supporter.

@Ambar: And it has about as much merit as when someone from r/theredpill insists that "if you flip the gender pronouns in [this statement], you'll clearly see how sexist liberals are!"
With the exception of Jews due to the frequent use of terminology one would associate with Wall Street as a dog-whistle, it's not really comparable in the slightest to a rant about Muslims or Reptillians or any of the other things you mentioned. It's really not hard to mad-lib a statement and make it ridiculous and/or offensive.
edited 26th Apr '17 7:39:00 PM by CaptainCapsase