Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
It started out as opposition research but then the agent started working for free because the truth was becoming more and more disturbing the more he dug.
He even turned in his findings directly to the FBI in August.
The agent is also credible enough to have worked on the FIFA scandal.
@Captain Capsase: I sincerely hope we are wrong, off base, and totally overreacting-because the alternative is keeping me from sleeping soundly. That said, at least we are looking at the evidence here; if the core piece of evidence surrounding this mess was as easily refuted as 'no basement', that would be comforting.
edited 13th Jan '17 8:34:11 PM by ViperMagnum357
It's still weird to me because Clinton doesn't really get anything out of a secret pedophilia ring. At least with Putin you could make a case that he's furthering Russia's geopolitical goals, regardless of whether specific allegations are founded or not.
I know this is gonna sound weird but if all this stuff is true and we make it through this I really want to see a movie about this shit in twenty years. There's probably a ton of backroom stuff going on that we're completely oblivious too right now. I'd be curious to get a more complete picture of what this looks like to the people in the government.
![]()
![]()
It typically had something to do with either making money or comparisons that pedophilia scandal that came out of the British parliament a while ago.
Edit: To use an example of the direction the logic being thrown around here goes, do any of you believe the CIA was behind the color revolutions and the Arab Spring? Or the protests against Putin? Because saying "oh Russia installed Trump, blah" is only slightly more credible an assertion. Russian leadership certainly believes both were backed by the United States, because, in their view, people simply do not rise up spontaneously without a state actor behind them. You are engaging the same flawed reasoning.
edited 13th Jan '17 8:41:38 PM by CaptainCapsase
I mean, I tend to think he wouldn't have won without Russian interference, but I think that's also true of a half-dozen other factors. Mostly I think that american elections are complicated events affected by hundreds of different things, may of which are hard to measure the precise impact of. But Trump won by a narrow enough margin that removing just about any significant factor that worked in his favour could be expected to have a reasonable possibility of changing the outcome.
![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't think anyone here is arguing this as some sort of master plan cooked up in the depths of the Kremlin; rather, Putin took advantage of several long shot events brewing into an unlikely confluence. The partisanship has been percolating since 1994, the refusal to accept any opponent as legitimate and treating every Democrat as merely an aggravating obstacle reached fruition in the 2010 midterms. Voter Suppression has been an ongoing concern since the 1960's, and the urban/rural Divide even longer. The KGB may have been trying to cultivate Trump as an asset as early as the late 80's before the wall fell; not as some linchpin, but as just one more chip they might get to cash in down the road. 2016 was the equivalent of an old lotto ticket you lost in the couch cushions getting renewed and striking the jackpot on a technicality after you spent a decade in poverty.
We were going to have a serious problem in this country anyway with a likely Republican, obstructive Senate and House, and a real possibility of a Republican president to rubber stamp their abhorrent platform. Once Trump was leading the pack and won the primary, the entire FSB must have climaxed.
edited 13th Jan '17 8:58:23 PM by ViperMagnum357
Perhaps you aren't, but I'm not sure about many of the other regular posters, much less the random masses on the Internet. Turning this into a conspiracy theory and fomenting distrust in American intelligence agencies is the best way for Trump to bury this. That being said, you definitely are arguing this is some sort of master plan by the Kremlin, albeit one that's at least remotely plausible.
edited 13th Jan '17 9:03:52 PM by CaptainCapsase
So this is a summary of those things I've said:
TRUMP GOT ELECTED PRESIDENT FOR FUCKS SAKE.
The Russians managed to stack British intelligence with their lackeys back in the day and somehow you don't think they could do the same here, despite the fact that they've just embarrassed the IC with their hacking?
Come on, now.
New Survey coming this weekend!Newsweek: Paul Ryan vows to repeal and replace Obamacare simultaneously
Early during the CNN forum, an Arizona cancer patient told Ryan that the Affordable Care Act saved his life and thanked President Barack Obama for his health care coverage. “Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, I’m standing here alive,” Jeff Jeans said, before asking the House speaker why he would repeal the ACA without a replacement.
“Oh, we wouldn’t do that. We want to replace it with something better,” Ryan said. He explained that Republicans believe state high-risk pools are a smarter way of guaranteeing coverage for Americans with pre-existing conditions. The existing law, he said, is “collapsing,” and the GOP must step in to rescue Americans in need of health coverage. Earlier this week, Ryan had said that some elements of an insurance substitute likely would be ready when lawmakers vote to repeal the law, but other aspects would take time.
For years, Republicans have been trying to get rid of Obama’s 2010 signature health care law. Eight days before Obama leaves office, Senate Republicans took their first official step in dismantling the measure by passing a budget resolution earlier on Thursday, despite hours-long resistance from Democrats. The vote instructs committees in the House and Senate to begin the process of working on legislation to repeal major parts of the ACA. The House is expected to take up the legislation on Friday.
When CNN’s Jake Tapper asked Ryan if he could provide more details about when the replacement would happen, the Republican said, “I don’t have a date, but that’s something we’re working on right now.... We’re working on this as fast as possible.”
On Tuesday, Trump told congressional Republicans to pass an Obamacare replacement “very quickly.” They plan to officially repeal the law by the end of February or the beginning of March, Politico reported.
During the town hall, Ryan said the GOP can put a better system in place. “We can and should have a system in this country where everybody can have access to affordable health care, including people with pre-existing conditions,” he said. “That’s not what this law is doing. This law is failing on that front.”
During the one-hour event, audience members also questioned Ryan on Planned Parenthood, Russia and immigration. One undocumented immigrant mother, who currently is protected from deportation because of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals immigration policy, asked Ryan whether he thought she should be deported. “No,” he said. “What we have to do is find a way to make sure that you can get right with the law. And we have to do this in a good way so that the rug doesn’t get pulled out from under you and your family gets separated.”
CNN hosted a similar event on Tuesday with Senator Bernie Sanders, the one-time Democratic presidential candidate who now holds a leadership role in the Senate. He promised an audience member with incurable breast cancer that he would do everything he can to improve the ACA. “It has problems,” he added, “but we damn well are not going to see it repealed and have no replacement there.”
Tactical, you're taking an extreme position simply because of the end result. You take the extreme position frequently, and have also frequently stated that the Democratic Party should take authoritarian stances regarding its own membership. Capsase's criticisms apply pretty well to many of your arguments.
Yes, I believe that Russians fucked around with our election. Yes, I believe they gathered quite a bit of information on Trump. I also believe that the FBI itself seems to support Trump. Comey certainly broke a whole lot of rules regarding how the FBI should act regarding the election.
This is not the same thing as Russian intelligence having active spies in the FBI itself. Frankly, in a legal sense, it's a weak connection leading to a disprovable conclusion on your part. It's the kind of thing that requires more evidence, no matter how certain you are that you know the truth.
If I'm not mistaken, the FBI New York office was stated once to have quite a few agents believe that Clinton Cash was factual despite the author literally admitting that there was nothing whatsoever admissible as evidence of anything in the book.
The CIA didn't want to have anything to do with anything that would appear to be interfering with the election, regardless of how bad things got and how much evidence was furnished. At least they have more principles than Comey.
A North Dakota lawmaker wants to make it so drivers cannot be legally liable for running over people protesting on roads
. Or anyone spending longer than usual on one on foot. Yes, the lawmaker responsible is funded by oil money. Why do you ask?
Sacking of the general supposedly overseeing security during the Trump administration: See this
.
I think it's possible that Comey has been compromised by Russian intelligence (I tried to post that many hours ago but internet died mid post), however it's also possible (and more likely) that he's simply an asshole who decided to illegally meddle with the election for his own reasons.
As for what could cause a Trump impeachment by the Republicans, beyond a total party death threat from something absurd like an actual sex tape fo Trump and his daughter being leaked it would have to be a threat to their safety. A threat either from an angry mob, law enforcement or possible Trump himself.
Look how the press has circled the wagons over Trump's threats. You think Congress wouldn't do the same? If Trump starts trying to round up rival politicians and have them jailed I think he might get impeached because everyone would be worried that they'd be next.
edited 13th Jan '17 10:44:41 PM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran

edited 13th Jan '17 8:33:07 PM by CaptainCapsase