Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
@M84: I mean, I don't think it'll really reassure people of anything of the sort. Like, the headlines go:
- Guys what if Russian Hacking rigged the election?
- We're having a recount because we think there might have been Russian Hacking.
- Oh, wait, never mind, it was nothing.
It goes without saying that the third is the least attention grabbing, and therefore will get the least attention, doesn't it?
edited 27th Nov '16 7:43:20 PM by Gilphon
Impeachment for corruption: Given the amount of leeway politicians can get (Bridgegate, anyone?), yeah, it's not happening. But has anyone ever been impeached for having so many openings for foreign interests to gain leverage?
Recount being liberal birtherism: You'd have to find someone willing to insist that this was rigged in Trump's favor in less than legal means (i.e. ballot stuffing, destroying or tampering) as opposed to good old fashioned voter suppression. It's a Hail Mary, yes, but I doubt it's going to be a continuous effort the way voter suppression is.
More shit that didn't come out before the election, because lolemails
. The more time passes the more I'm tempted to unperson people who claim the media was biased in Hillary's favor.
Also, since I recall someone mentioning a strike as a protest, I've seen calls for a general strike on January 20th. However, a lot of the people calling for it may have been those anarchist types who complained about neo-imperialism, voted Stein in a swing state and then realized they fucked up, so use your judgement.
EDIT: I think I would prefer to be anything but sober when I do get Stein's opinion on Corbyn.
edited 27th Nov '16 7:46:05 PM by Krieger22
I have disagreed with her a lot, but comparing her to republicans and propagandists of dictatorships is really low. - An idiot![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
ever since Obama took office the Republican party has tried to prove he can't be president, they said he wasn't an American citizen, that he was Islamic (despite religion not making one fit or unfit to hold office), all sorts of crazy conspiracy theory shit, and now the Democrats are calling for recounts, and Hillary won the popular vote, the Republicans keep going on about how they "won" the election and that all this stuff is a conspiracy by the "liberal elite" to stop Trump, or that it is illegals voting! going into echo chambers and "safe spaces" where only their crazy is allowed, and Trump supporters are some of the most vocal about that being terrible and a bad thing, so I like to point out the irony in the most snarky, condescending way possible
edited 27th Nov '16 7:47:02 PM by FieldMarshalFry
advancing the front into TV TropesStein got so few votes, even if all of her votes had voted Clinton (rather than staying home, as many would have) Clinton would have still lost.
But the anarchist types, they likely voted Johnson, who DID have enough votes to swing things-but it's impossible to know what percentage of those would have voted Clinton in Johnson's absence.
No, I mean about Sanders and Corbryn
edited 27th Nov '16 7:46:23 PM by TheyCallMeTomu
@Red Savant It would be a pretty big deal if the error in counting was enough to actually swing the state to HRC. But that's probably not going to happen. Even if it did, it would not be enough to swing the election.
Granted, it would be egg on Paul Ryan's face.
edited 27th Nov '16 7:47:18 PM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprisedIn America, impeachment is associated with Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, and in both cases it was more a partisan political move.
Richard Nixon was facing impeachment but he decided to resign instead.
For Trump to be impeached, the evidence and blackmail material needs to be gathered as we speak by Republicans. They will probably unleash it some time next year, so to give Mike Pence three years and with enough time before Midterms to give them a united One-Party State.
edited 27th Nov '16 7:49:48 PM by JulianLapostat
Corbyn has stood by his values for decades over here, talking to the IRA which led to an end to The Troubles despite public and political opinion being against him, has campaigned for nuclear disarmament, was against Iraq, never compromising his values to fall in line with Blair and his bunch, and Sanders is the closest you lot are going to get to someone like him, simply because the US political system is an order of magnitude more corrupt than ours due to its sheer size and the amount of money at stake
advancing the front into TV TropesEh, I'm not so sure.
As long as Trump remains popular with his base, if Republicans act to impeach Trump, they're threatened with angering their base, which will see it as corruption being rampant in Washington because that's what Trump ran on.
It'd be kind of amusing if Republicans tried, and Trump in his typical "fuck you for backstabbing me" fashion decided to reach across the aisle to democrats.
Either we're having entirely different conversations, or your logic doesn't follow. More money=/=corrupt ipso facto.
edited 27th Nov '16 7:51:36 PM by TheyCallMeTomu
I'm honestly getting really sick of the anarchist types (to borrow your phrasing and apply it loosely to many people on the far left side of the spectrum) making snide comments on my Facebook feed about how Hillary lost because she was too corrupt and didn't sway their little socialist hearts. In swing states, mind. Of course most of them are middle-class white hipsters who have nothing personal to fear from a Trump presidency.
It's been fun.The Republicans will only impeach Trump if he is caught doing something so blatantly awful, stupid, and dangerous that even his base would be reluctant to defend him.
Agreed. IMHO, those wannabe V for Vendetta types can go fuck themselves.
edited 27th Nov '16 7:53:45 PM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprisedI am strongly opposed to democrats debasing themselves the way Republicans did. You don't get to claim to be the adult in the room if you cease acting like one.
Then again, maybe that's the problem; stop claiming to be the adult in the room and just be as corrupt as everyone else. Shift that overton window leftward.
@Probablyinsane: The thing is, we can't. The Republicans were able to deadlock Obama's initiatives and bog down the country because they had a Congressional majority, so they could just go 'hmm, nah' when he asked them to do things. Going into Trump's presidency, we're going to have a Republican-controlled Congress, and they'll kneel down and let him walk on their backs to pass whatever hateful legislation his advisors want.
@Impeachment talk: Like what? Everything that's been suggested here has already been done by Trump and people defended it until they were red in the face.
edited 27th Nov '16 7:54:45 PM by RedSavant
It's been fun.
Far as I'm concerned, any registered Democrat who didn't bother to vote for HRC in any state that wasn't deep Blue like California (keep in mind a lot of registered Democratic Californians voted for HRC anyway including yours truly) shares responsibility for Trump becoming POTUS.
Republicans impeaching Trump wouldn't upset Trump's base at all. Remember Trump's electorate included racist-revanchists but also regular Republicans who vote for the party and not for the candidate. And he lost the popular vote by a whopping big margin. So Trump has no real mandate. He won by fluke and everyone knows that.
If the Republican party impeach Trump, then they can expect windfall in the Midterm elections 2018 by voters who will say that the Republicans are the true party who purged their corrupt candidate while the Democrats never took a stand against Crooked Bill. And getting rid of Trump will even potentially sway some undecided voters and defectors from Democrats. Best part, Pence since he'd be completing Trump's term, has his own 8 years of Presidency ahead of him after that.
By that time, the Supreme Court could have a Conservative Supermajority barring a sleeper agent a la Eisenhower-Earl Warren.
I kind of think that if Trump gets impeached, it won't be for his worst scandal or even a scandal that would bring down a typical politician.
Rather he will simply tick off the wrong people in the wrong way, and at a time when his traditional allies are too frustrated with him to defend him in any meaningful way.
Well, Watergate wasn't even the worst thing Nixon did...and Bill Clinton got impeached for the weirdest perjury instance ever and general partisan psychopathy.
The key is not "why" to impeach, since reasons have a way of producing themselves. The key is when. "When the hurlyburly is done/and the battle is lost and won."

What are you talking about Field Marshal?