Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
WashPost confirms Trump's been turning away the briefings, Pence has been taking them all.
Pence is the president. This fits the thing that Trump doesn't want to be in the White House at all, he essentially wants to be doing more rallies and the like.
No, the electoral college is not going to reverse course and vote Clinton in.
The most likely outcome is they'll vote for Trump. The *second* most likely outcome is that there will be enough votes to go to Mc Mullin or whomever that Trump won't get the 270 he needs, and it'll go to the house of reps, which will *then* pick Trump.
![]()
You're correct in this assessment.
Trump being sworn into the White House is gonna sting when the day comes but I don't need to make it worse by hoping that it won't happen. It's too late now.
Anyways, Pence being the de-facto president is consistent with what many of us were expecting, but I still expect Trump to poke his nose in somewhat frequently and messing up Pence's plans.
edited 23rd Nov '16 6:30:45 PM by Draghinazzo
There's enough to impeach him NOW. Congress just won't do it. As soon as he's not willing to be their idiot with a pen, maybe. Then we'll just have Censor Pence as Brave Leader right?
Certainly healthier than praying for assassination, which I've seen once or twice
edited 23rd Nov '16 7:05:29 PM by Lanceleoghauni
"Coffee! Coffeecoffeecoffee! Coffee! Not as strong as Meth-amphetamine, but it lets you keep your teeth!"If he gets in Pence's way enough it's not unlikely. Ugh god, either Trump or Pence is a disaster for scientific research at this point but I feel like Pence has the stronger ideological cause to interfere. Glad I'm 100% sure of going into the private sector at this point but it's still fucking bullshit that we're going to see rightwing Lysenkoism forced onto academia.
![]()
![]()
I am trying to aim for "energized calm". I got it from a book about stress. I think it's like Tranquil Fury.
edited 23rd Nov '16 7:08:06 PM by probablyinsane
Plants are aliens, and fungi are nanomachines.Re: Trump administration's planned crackdown on "politicized science"
Nazi Germany's atomic weapon research was likewise hampered by the brass' distrust of "Jewish sciences", which otherwise would include critical minds such as Einstein and Oppenheimer.
__
On an almost comical note, I now realize that the two worst events in US history during the past decade took place on swapped date numbers.
Al-Qaeda struck New York and Washington DC on 9/11.
Trump was elected POTUS on 11/9.
Make of that what you will.
Honestly, I'm willing to give up conforming to reality in talking points if it'll win elections.
Liberals want to believe in things due to empirically provable points. But, they refused to believe that winning elections isn't about facts. But that has now been empirically proven. It's kind of a catch-22.
That being said, actual policy should still be conducted via actual facts.
I've been saying that for 2020, the Democrats need a strongly charismatic public speaker with as little dirt on them as possible, and definitely not too tied to "big business" if possible.
Their policies should obviously be grounded in facts, but as you said facts don't win elections. People care way more about reinforcing fundamentalist beliefs, or in the liberal sphere, feeling inspired than actual sane and reasonable policies.
edited 23rd Nov '16 7:57:13 PM by Draghinazzo
![]()
Maybe the moderate liberals do. The further left you go the more feels-centric and conspiratorial-minded people get, they're almost as bad as the right in that regard. But with the startlingly poor levels of education outside the big cities a lot of the people the Democrats want to win over to their sides simply aren't smart enough to comprehend reason even if it's being used, because most effective policies are by nature hard to boil down into cute and easy-to-understand soundbites.
Exactly. Tell the Lowest Common Denominator what they want to hear, while also signaling to the more educated parts of the voterbase with a base of facts. HRC overestimated the power of the latter with her constant referrals to her website rather than making affirmative statements out there where everyone can see them. Granted it's a bit dirty but the situation's pretty dire and when in recent memory have the Republicans actually fought fair?
edited 23rd Nov '16 8:11:07 PM by AlleyOop

Medical research will be in the firing line, too. The Republicans have been trying to kill medical research for years (especially stem cell research) because of the 'risk' of it 'facilitating' abortions to obtain foetal tissue for research purposes - they upped their game after those fake videos went around to discredit Planned Parenthood. This will be their next big target.
Edit: I see Clinton has surpassed 2 million votes
.
edited 23rd Nov '16 6:06:09 PM by Wyldchyld
If my post doesn't mention a giant flying sperm whale with oversized teeth and lionfish fins for flippers, it just isn't worth reading.