Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Well- if Romney had won, we certainly wouldn't have had Trump winning the election in that parallel universe, so at the very least the last year of American politics would've looked very different.
And it would've led to a GOP controlled administration, and it should be obvious to all that that would've had consequences.
But certainly Romney wouldn't have been nearly as bad as Trump looks like he's going to be.
edited 20th Nov '16 11:34:54 PM by Gilphon
It would've led to Hillary versus Romney. I think Romney would've won that and by 2020, I think Trump would've felt like he was too old to do the job.
![]()
BTW, that comment you made about Alex Jones? Trump's also a fan of Alex Jones and has granted his views legitimacy. That's yet another reason a lot of people are wary of Trump. He panders to conspiracy theorists.
I just hope that when Trump screws up, you'll hold him accountable for it and not vote for him again in four years.
edited 20th Nov '16 11:43:56 PM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprised
x3 I'll be honest, I'm curious why you supported him if you knew about the climate change stuff (also, did you know about Pence's support of conversion therapy?).
I really wish that Jeb! had been the nominee.
edited 20th Nov '16 11:43:20 PM by KarkatTheDalek
Oh God! Natural light!Trump has already screwed up by appointing a white supremacist into his Cabinet.
Any arguments about Trump's racism aside, there is no mistaking the fact that Bannon is a white supremacist and anti-semite. In that regard, he is actually worse than Trump, who is casually racist but not really devoted to the racism ideologically.
edited 20th Nov '16 11:44:21 PM by Draghinazzo
he's a fan of alex jones? The hell? this alex jones?: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9kAEoCHANYY&t=12s
![]()
![]()
I pretty sure that Chief Strategist isn't a Cabinet position.
I seem to recall someone here posting a response from their Congressman that while they certainly didn't believe that Bannon belongs in the White House and is willing to make their displeasure known, his appointment wasn't actually subject to Congressional approval.
edited 20th Nov '16 11:47:01 PM by KarkatTheDalek
Oh God! Natural light!My dad sadly supported Trump even though he doesn't like him because he supports his party first no matter what. A lifetime of watching Fox News and reading the Drudge Report has caused him to become oblivious to all the dog whistles and he became a big believer in Obama the Kenyan and Obama the Anti-Christ and Obama 'caused Brexit.
He pretty much just thinks the government is corrupt and at least with Republicans he'll pay less taxes to these corrupt institutions.
He also doesn't care about people on welfare despite being on welfare as a child. -facepalms-
Trump improved minority numbers
for all major groups voting for the Republican Party when compared to Romney. He got 30% of Asians and 30% of Latinos (granted, that includes Cubans, who are generally just "white" now), and 37% of "other" (i.e. not white, black, Asian, or Latino). I don't think it's accurate to say he succeeded mainly because of racism (unless you're talking about a specific state... like Wisconsin).
Then again, the narrative of Trump being the working man's candidate is also something of a myth. He won the wealthier income brackets and lost voters making less than $50,000 (median personal income in this country is $30,240). With all wealth brackets above 50k being really neck in neck. So it's not really an establishment revolt either.
![]()
>supported Trump
>sees Brexit as bad
how?
edited 20th Nov '16 11:48:22 PM by MonsieurThenardier
"It is very easy to be kind; the difficulty lies in being just."Here's another, more recent thing: Trump is encouraging foreign diplomats to stay at his hotels. Which means he's encouraging foreign diplomats to give him money. Which means he's encouraging foreign diplomats to bribe him.
As another thing, he just payed out a 24 Million dollar settlement for a fraud case. The settlement was only expected to be half that much. No other President-elect as ever had to pay a settlement for a fraud.
It was white rural workers that won it for Trump. He courted them by promising them that he'd rip up NAFTA which has hurt them and saying that he'd bring back coal and factory jobs.
Hillary was seen as pro-TPP which they didn't like. Obama should never have introduced that during the election. It hurt Hillary a lot.
I told him about how bad Brexit fucked up the UK and he jumped to Obama. It was like a reflex.

edited 20th Nov '16 11:33:04 PM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprised