Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Women can vote R. because they are racists and their racism overrides their interests as women.
Women can vote on single issues, like that the Muslim woman who voted Trump, even though the reasoning is quite stupid and shortsighted.
Women can vote for a misogynist because they are either downplaying the misogyny or think they can benefit from it or think there is nothing wrong with a powerful man doing as he likes because women should feel attracted to men like Trump.
Women can vote against Hillary because they don't like Hillary for not being feminine or not thinking that Hillary represents women or the equivalent of #Not All Women when it comes to gender policies.
There were plenty of justifications from women over why they voted Trump, but when you put them in an scale, they aren't good or reasonable justifications.
Inter arma enim silent legesHere's another "whoa" for you; calling people racist or misogynistic - surprisingly - does not deter them from the voting booths. Weird, I know. Not even some of the minority voters care enough to be considered "bigots".
Trump won a larger percent of the minority vote than Romney did in 2012. Clearly, there are too many issues to address in this country than to simply throw ad hominems around and pat yourselves on the back.
edited 11th Nov '16 5:46:08 AM by hardcorefakes
Politics has never been about facts. When the left relies on identity politics and tribalism and othering, they tend to lose. Because the left's identity doesn't have anything going for it except facts. The right's identity has every dirty trick and emotional lever in the books.
Moving forward, I think this is an excellent opportunity to stand up for our moral values and challenge realistic, actual in your face evil when we see it in our daily lives. But we need to be righteous without being self-righteous. Nobody ever voted for someone because a stranger told them they would be morally deficient if they voted any other way.
As far as I know, nobody in this thread likes it that millions of people voted for Trump, but they did, and that's too many people to shame into the closet and act like what they think can be marginalized.
@Ogodei: I agree that the news media is a large part of the problem, but I don't think they're redeemable at this point. They're profit-driven entities, and what's profitable will always be non-factual, emotionally-driven entertainment, not facts.
The good news is that the grass roots and independent reporting the internet enables is going to make them irrelevant in the long run... provided that we don't get metered to death by our IS Ps for visiting the 'wrong' websites, anyway. Which may happen, if Trump decides Net Neutrality is worth shooting down.
edited 11th Nov '16 5:47:43 AM by Karkadinn
Furthermore, I think Guantanamo must be destroyed.Even if most of the Trump supporters aren't raving bigots licking their lips at the thought of Making America White Again, the ones that aren't still heard Trump's bigoted viewpoints, saw how he emboldened the racists, and yet STILL voted for him anyway
. And that's ignoring the fact that Trump didn't really propose policies in the first place.
It may become even more of a circus, given the example Trump set for earning votes. And money speaks quite loudly.
edited 11th Nov '16 5:50:39 AM by nervmeister
Now him and a team of like minded people is sitting in the Congress and the White House, let that sink in for a minute.
Inter arma enim silent legesNews fairness/news reporting things of actual import: Even without the contributions of intellectual titans like nervmeister, the big media companies are too dependent on views generated by manufactured outrage to change now, especially in an age where anyone with a microphone, Audacity and Google Image Search at the very least can get the same sort of following the big American cable channels do.
Campaign funding: Who knows? We don't even know how much Trump stands to profit now that he's committed affinity fraud and won.
I have disagreed with her a lot, but comparing her to republicans and propagandists of dictatorships is really low. - An idiotI will agree that reducng the outcome to just bigotry isn't entirely right. After all, it was complemented by self-destructive protest votes by people using the ballot as an anger management tool, much like how we got Brexit, as well as the roles of a 20-year smear campaign (as I understand it, an even longer smear campaign was an important part of how we got Brexit) and an FBI director with an axe to grind.
And that said, to downplay the role of bigotry in Trump's win, both in driving his own turnout and driving down Hillary's is to ignore the foundation of Trump's campaign, his speeches, his rallies everything. His primary message has been "I know just who to blame for all of America's woes, vote for me and we'll persecute the hell out of them and build a wall to keep them from ever coming back".
"No actually. It played a noticeable role or at least contributed to an extent, but even if every racist left in the U.S. voted for Trump, it alone wouldn't have cost Hil the election, even with the lower voter turnout."
The Trump vote marks them as a racist. That can never be forgotten or forgiven. You cannot separate the vote from the bigotry. You're too forgiving towards these cretins.
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."The next presidential campaign is probably not going to have as much money in it because this one shows that there is a hard ceiling on the benefit of injecting more and more cash into a single candidate. After a certain point, it just stops mattering.
That doesn't necessarily mean overall campaign spending will go down, though. The two parties might just spread their financial eggs around more evenly in different races. In hindsight, it's hard not to think that maybe a lot of Clinton's money would have been better spent helping her fellow Democrats play damage control in the other branches.
Furthermore, I think Guantanamo must be destroyed.As I've said before, people who voted for him may not be personally or especially racist, however by voting for him they are being complicit with his racism, bigotry, and general buffoonery and that is a pretty big moral slight against them. It doesn't necessarily mean one should demonize them, but it is what it is.
It's not necessarily about patting yourself on the back for being better than them or anything (though yes the left does that a lot), just an acknowledgment of the state of things in the american public.
Karkadin especially is right that facts usually don't matter that much in politics, and this election has been a rude awakening towards that fact.
edited 11th Nov '16 6:26:07 AM by Draghinazzo

@protests, there are some reports of things going bad in Portland. Rock attacks against police, shops being vandalized, and a few arrests after some began arming themselves with combustibles and threatening arson.