Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
The divide over Trump within the GOP is literally tearing families apart.
http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/world/alabama-trump-republican-civil-war-south-1.3831547
Jill Stein campaign now openly preferring a Trump presidency
This is why Third parties fucking suck
New Survey coming this weekend!It's interesting to see people say 538 is full of it when it is saying that Clinton will win with a 4-5 point lead. Throughout the campaign Silver has said that his model actually favours Trump (due to it giving more weight towards exatreams and giving weight to a possible failure of polling) and that should be accounted for. However he still has Clinton ahead and that means he thinks she will win, and by a solid margin currently.
edited 2nd Nov '16 9:10:39 AM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranI'm sure there are Greens who romanticize being part of a "resistance."
It's easy to rebel. It's harder to govern, and the Green Party is choking on feel-good nonsense at the expense of solid policy.
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."That's the paradox - a significant chunk of the population doesn't trust anyone except themselves. It's a large chunk of the appeal of the Libertarian Party - the idea that we can chain back the government by a combination of legislation and privately-owned firearms. The inherent problem there is that, if you have a government that's strong enough to prevent individual acts of coercion, then by definition you have a government strong enough to crush private action against the government as well. (Libertarians don't mind withholding of resources as a means of coercion, though that brings another problem to their thesis and that's regulatory capture.)
I wonder how legal it would be, to set up a TV outside of poll locations, and all it plays is Trump's many many gaffes. should counter Viewers Are Goldfish
Edit: page topper
edited 2nd Nov '16 9:23:44 AM by Jetyl
I'm afraid I can't explain myself, sir. Because I am not myself, you see?Unless Trump comes out of nowhere and wins several blue states, he flat out cannot win without Florida.
Also, fuck the Green party.
Totally illegal. No campaigning on election day, that goes double as far as polling stations go.
edited 2nd Nov '16 9:26:01 AM by Rationalinsanity
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.Meanwhile, Bill Weld, Gary Johnson's running mate, has all but endorsed Hillary Clinton for anyone who feels that they cannot in good conscience throw their vote away by voting Libertarian.
To think that at one point I thought the Greens' platform looked kind of okay.
edited 2nd Nov '16 9:25:22 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Stein has been really going off the deep end, hasn't she? I feel like a lot of my fellow high schoolers are going to support her anyway for the simple reason that she's not Hillary Clinton. Even among more left-leaning people very few people I've talked to seem to genuinely like her and I can't really figure out why. Among Republicans, sure, I understand why they wouldn't like her, but among Democrats too? I find it all so confusing.
If Hillary can win FL, this race is basically over, so I'm crossing m fingers and hoping that it happens. According to 270towin, Hillary could lose literally every other swing state and still win.
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work." -Thomas Edison
Blame decades of GOP witch hunts and smear campaigns, residual bad feelings from Bill's sexual issues, and — let's face it — because she's a capable and driven woman. That, and she's been the media's favorite punching bag for decades. Put all of those together...
There aren't many actually rational reasons to disapprove of her, much less hate her.
edited 2nd Nov '16 9:39:07 AM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprised
×5 Have to admit, politics aside, ERB!Trump has the better wordplay. Sure that's not the sole metric over which rap battles are evaluated, but it's the one I feel I'm not completely crap at judging.
edited 2nd Nov '16 10:17:38 AM by Medinoc
"And as long as a sack of shit is not a good thing to be, chivalry will never die."

I'm going to copy/paste something I just sent my friend on Skype, since it's relevant to the country's current situation:
I was thinking of something. Companies like to say they "don't take charity cases" when hiring people, as if "charity" is a bad word.
But we have people who are refused jobs because of their criminal history despite wanting to get back to work. To say nothing of the disabled (Hillary Clinton made some overtures to the disabled and the difficulty or inability many have in getting jobs).
I think companies should be more willing to take "charity cases"! Otherwise, we have a huge class of perpetually unemployed people.
Of course, it's shareholders who don't like to hear that the company is doing something other than soullessly attempting to maximize its profit at the expense of everything else. Hiring employees means paying them. Hiring people who are discriminated against for whatever reason means possibly paying people who provide less value to the company, and thus reducing profits. Shareholders don't want to hear that.
I do believe shareholder culture is behind a lot of corporate bad behavior. Of course companies in general can be selfish and not care about anything other than the pursuit of profit at any cost, but there have been multiple editorials from capitalists themselves saying that as companies shifted their focus towards maximizing shareholder value, their ethics fell away - and not only their ethics, but their long-term profitability. Of course, I've talked about that before, so I'll move on to something else.
I've seen it said that a society without morals falls apart, and I'm seeing many examples of why. Not just corporate misbehavior, but things like our current society's distrust of each other, of the police and politicians - without trust that those in charge can do the right thing, and also without trust of one's neighbors, who do people have left to trust? And what do people do when they have no-one they can trust?
It becomes much easier to degenerate into a "me vs. the rest of the world" mentality when you're convinced the rest of the world feels the same way, whether true or not. And if you do think that way, then it also becomes easier to lie and cheat others, being convinced it's the only way to survive. And if you do that, then it means you're adding to the very problem that's affecting you? And then what?
Anarchists say they distrust government, but what do they trust, when polls show that most Americans believe that most people can't be trusted? Like it or not, some trust needs to exist, and that trust will be in whoever "runs things", which technically makes them a government regardless of whether or not they're called that. And to make sure the states can work together, whoever "runs things" must be able to connect with other groups elsewhere, and work together collectively. Almost like, well, a state or federal government. Hmm.