TVTropes Now available in the app store!
Open

Follow TV Tropes

Following

The General US Politics Thread

Go To

Nov 2023 Mod notice:


There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.

If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines before posting here.

Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.

If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules when posting here.


In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.

Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM

Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#147451: Oct 31st 2016 at 11:02:02 AM

[up][up] Can you provide evidence of this diversity, at least in comparison with the Democrats? Because the GOP has been doing its best to expunge the people who don't agree with them for decades.

Obviously, any attempt to put people in neat little boxes and apply labels to them is going to be an approximation at best, but it is possible to draw reasonable conclusions from observed facts.

edited 31st Oct '16 11:02:48 AM by Fighteer

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Ultimatum Disasturbator from the Amiga Forest (Old as dirt) Relationship Status: Who needs love when you have waffles?
Disasturbator
#147452: Oct 31st 2016 at 11:02:15 AM

What's the monty python reference?

have a listen and have a link to my discord server
AlleyOop Since: Oct, 2010
#147453: Oct 31st 2016 at 11:04:18 AM

[up]

Weld blasted Trump with a reference to the "Monty Python and the Holy Grail" scene where a mob of villagers lob ridiculous arguments that their victim is a witch.

"Mr. Trump braying about this latest development reminds me of the guy in Monty Python who says 'She's a witch, burn her! Burn her!" Weld said, with a mock British accent. "It has no more content than that. And the point of that skit in Monty Python was that those townspeople were ignorant and stupid — not that they were great."

NoName999 Since: May, 2011
#147454: Oct 31st 2016 at 11:04:22 AM

[up]x5 Not really. They just have the Protestant Evangelicals, the Big Businessesmen, and the deplor—- I mean Dixiecrats

Everyone else jumped ship

edited 31st Oct '16 11:05:45 AM by NoName999

EpicBleye drunk bunny from her bed being very eepy Since: Sep, 2014 Relationship Status: In Lesbians with you
drunk bunny
#147455: Oct 31st 2016 at 11:13:01 AM

[up][up][up][up]My own experience, for one. I live in a very poor neighborhood, yet the majority of the people here are supporting Trump (and that includes the minorities that live here) because they feel bitter at the issues presented by the democratic party- notably the cost of welfare and the burden that it's putting on the middle class.

Furthermore, a lot of people feel bitter due to the fact that they literally cannot escape poverty because of the enforced insurances they must have, plus the fact that they literally cannot escape living under welfare (this is caused by the fact that if they make too much they lose out on welfare, and how much they make from their job isn't enough to pay all the bills or feed their kids, so they're forced to remain low-income or jobless in order to receive welfare in order to actually survive). And this is despite the fact that they actually want to work for a living and work their way up the chain.

Since the democratic party isn't giving them options to get out of the cycle of welfare they're pushed under, the only other option they have is the republican party that is promising change (Even if it's under false pretenses).

Yet, they still don't agree with all of the party's actions nor do they agree with shit like this happening. They're just uninformed like most people are, republican and democrat.

Let me be clear: I do not support Trump and I do not support the modern Republican party. I agree that voting Republican at this point would be really fucking stupid and detrimental to the country.

But don't go throwing everyone that votes Republican under the bus as degenerates simply because you don't see eye-to-eye, and understand that people don't necessarily have to support everything their party says 100%.

edited 31st Oct '16 11:15:51 AM by EpicBleye

"There's not a girl alive who wouldn't be happy being called cute." ~Tamamo-no-Mae
carbon-mantis Collector Of Fine Oddities from Trumpland Since: Mar, 2010 Relationship Status: Married to my murderer
Collector Of Fine Oddities
#147456: Oct 31st 2016 at 11:14:38 AM

Are there even enough registered dixiecrats left to be more than a drop in the statistical pond? Even in the near-south where I live the few I know who are still registered democrats are in their 80's now. The rest left the party and went Republican or Libertarian when Obama won the nomination.

[up]edit- God how I'd like to see welfare stigma die in a fire. I've known homeless who refuse it because anyone around here on it is automatically labeled a social parasite.

The insurance hole is a goddamn travesty, but people ignore that it's the doing of the courts and their state's governments and not the president.

edited 31st Oct '16 11:18:02 AM by carbon-mantis

LSBK Since: Sep, 2014
#147457: Oct 31st 2016 at 11:16:34 AM

It might be a matter of state party over national party. People being willing to vote Democratic locally but not nationally. The inverse happens fairly often in blue states after all.

AmbarSonofDeshar Since: Jan, 2010
#147458: Oct 31st 2016 at 11:26:10 AM

Dixiecrat no longer refers to actual Southern Democrats. It refers to people who, politically, hold to the views of the old Dixiecrat constituency. Almost all of them are Republican now, but that doesn't change their views, just their outlook. One could make a compelling case that Trump himself is a Dixiecrat.

JackOLantern1337 Shameful Display from The Most Miserable Province in the Russian Empir Since: Aug, 2014 Relationship Status: 700 wives and 300 concubines
Shameful Display
#147459: Oct 31st 2016 at 11:27:27 AM

@Forest Technically the government doesn't need to help them. Their numbers are insufficient to achieve an electoral majority.

@Numbers: Remember most of these people are not very well educated. Also they would probably point out that if a pipeline went through a place where they were living and they protested nobody would give a dam. Mind you it's not that what they are saying is true, or that they don't have a whole host of bigoted assumptions about Native Americans, my Mom on her worse days at least seems to believe they are ex savages and current drunken hooligans and welfare loafers who exist to serve as a liberal cudgel against America and to appear in "crying Indian" adds about the environment. Mind you she comes from the Southwest, where the Indian wars are relatively recent history, and very personal memory for both many of the long time locals, and of course the Native Americans themselves.

I Bring Doom,and a bit of gloom, but mostly gloom.
TobiasDrake (•̀⤙•́) (Edited uphill both ways) Relationship Status: Arm chopping is not a love language!
(•̀⤙•́)
#147460: Oct 31st 2016 at 11:41:59 AM

I just have a hard time seeing how the Trumpets could have dissed Sanders. All the anti-Clinton rhetoric is just that - anti-Clinton, not anti-Democrat.

By baiting him into saying or doing something stupid.

Remember that time Trump offered to debate Sanders before the primaries were completed and Sanders rose to the occasion, only for Trump to withdraw and claim it was a joke? And how all that ultimately accomplished was the complete destruction of Sanders's credibility among the DNC, who were beyond livid that he would try to sidestep the primaries and debate Trump before a nominee had even been selected?

With a single half-joke, Trump tricked Sanders into politically assassinating himself. It was so effortless for him that one can only imagine how many of Trump's bootprints Sanders would have on his face by the end of each debate.

Incidentally, another thing that I've noticed is that sometimes people refer to the second part of Hillary Rodham Clinton's name as her "middle name". It's not that, though; it's her original last name, before she married Bill Clinton

Trump himself hilariously made that mistake during his "Hillary Rotten Clinton" speech, where he announced that was going to be his new nickname for her instead of Crooked Hillary.

It didn't stick, presumably because of how many people raced to correct him on it. He made himself look like an idiot, then promptly started pretending that didn't happen. As he does.

And because of that, and the anger that so many have toward a broken political system, millions are going to vote for Trump not because they agree with him, not because they like his bigotry or ego, but just because they can. Just because it will upset the apple cart and make mommy and daddy mad.

Voting takes work. Nobody who's just trying to cheese off their parents is actually going to take the time to put in a ballot. They'll just talk about it really loudly whenever their parents are around.

My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#147462: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:20:37 PM

millions are going to vote for Trump not because they agree with him, not because they like his bigotry or ego, but just because they can. Just because it will upset the apple cart and make mommy and daddy mad.
And we are supposed to respect that?

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
rmctagg09 The Wanderer from Brooklyn, NY (Before Recorded History) Relationship Status: I won't say I'm in love
The Wanderer
#147463: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:23:04 PM

@Xopher's thing several pages ago: Well the thing is, if you know anything about the United States' involvement in the Western Hemisphere, you'll know about its interference in the islands of the Caribbean.

While Hispaniola is the most infamous example, a lot of Jamaica's current woes can be attributed to American involvement because they felt it was getting too close to Cuba and more Communist as a result.

But that's a little besides the point that I'm trying to make, which is that while it's true that in the eyes of a lot of people in the Third World it doesn't really matter who wins a US presidential election because they feel they're fucked regardless, I'm pretty sure Trump will be way worse for the world at large than Clinton regardless, if he wins.

Also, you have to remember this op-ed was made before certain other things about Trump came to light, and before we knew Pence would be his VP. (Though I feel going "Trump's just cynically saying this stuff to get elected" ignores how he's been actively making life miserable for racial minorities for years even before the election started, and how whether he actually believes the drivel that comes out of his mouth or not is irrelevant when it causes tangible harm to people, but I digress.)

Hugging a Vanillite will give you frostbite.
Rationalinsanity from Halifax, Canada Since: Aug, 2010 Relationship Status: It's complicated
#147464: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:24:05 PM

CNN didn't project that, they interviewed one Congressman who said it could cost her the election.

Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
TacticalFox88 from USA Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Dating the Doctor
#147465: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:26:27 PM

So...Jill Stein is calling for a national conversation on oppressive comedians....

No, I'm not kidding.

edited 31st Oct '16 12:26:39 PM by TacticalFox88

New Survey coming this weekend!
GameGuruGG Vampire Hunter from Castlevania (Before Recorded History)
Vampire Hunter
#147466: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:30:31 PM

The Democratic platform focuses more on urban needs than it does on rural needs, which makes sense as the strongholds for the Democratic party are cities whereas the Republican party takes basically all the land outside of the cities. Urban people and rural people tend to have very different needs which clash quite frequently.

Wizard Needs Food Badly
Fighteer Lost in Space from The Time Vortex (Time Abyss) Relationship Status: TV Tropes ruined my love life
Lost in Space
#147467: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:31:54 PM

Still think Stein's a qualified candidate, folks?

[up] And one of the greatest lies of the past half century is that the Republican Party's leadership or policies have even the slightest concern with the economic plight of rural Americans.

edited 31st Oct '16 12:34:47 PM by Fighteer

"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"
Blueeyedrat Since: Oct, 2010
#147468: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:32:29 PM

This whole thing just gives me anxiety. Ugh.

BestOf FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC! from Finland Since: Oct, 2010 Relationship Status: Falling within your bell curve
FABRICATI DIEM, PVNC!
#147469: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:35:54 PM

Here's an actual email - well, at least based on the address and signature - that's apparently been sent to Stein's supporters by her campaign.

Here's the thing. Regardless of the content of that email, the fact that it's so poorly written would be enough, if I was in Stein's email list, to leave me seriously doubting whether that email is even real. The content has all sorts of problems, obviously, but if your delivery is that bad it barely even matters what you're trying to say. 5/10 would be my grade for that. (In the Finnish system, 5 is the lowest passing score.)

edited 31st Oct '16 12:36:52 PM by BestOf

Quod gratis asseritur, gratis negatur.
Falrinn Since: Dec, 2014
#147470: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:38:41 PM

So apparently Donald Trump thinks Hillary will let 650 million immigrants into the country. In one week.

If it was just once and he didn't give a timeframe, I could believe that he really meant something like "65 million immigrants over the course of her term". Which is an exceeding high figure, but not an absolutely insane figure that no one should be able to say out loud and continue to believe after they completed the sentence.

But it seems Trump used the figure at 3 different rallies and at the 3rd one specified that it would be in one week and would "triple the size of the country" which means he understood the magnitudes of the numbers involved perfectly. He just doesn't care that they are completely absurd.

....Honestly if Hillary actually had a way to bring 650 million people into the country in a week, I'd probably consider that a reason to vote for her. The kind of large-scale coordination you would need to achieve such a massive movement of people in such a short length of time without killing half of them in the process is a mark of a legendary leader.

AmbarSonofDeshar Since: Jan, 2010
#147471: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:39:07 PM

I find it rather amusing that, in effect, Bill Weld is pro-Clinton and Stein is pro-Trump.

Oh and Stein has money invested in Monsanto.

edited 31st Oct '16 12:40:21 PM by AmbarSonofDeshar

Rationalinsanity from Halifax, Canada Since: Aug, 2010 Relationship Status: It's complicated
#147472: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:41:16 PM

The Libertarians, whatever their motives, don't want to see the US/the world/a lot of people in it burn for the sake of advancing their ideology. The Greens are accelerationists to the core.

Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.
Lightysnake Since: May, 2010
#147473: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:42:53 PM

@ Epic Bleye

Furthermore, a lot of people feel bitter due to the fact that they literally cannot escape poverty because of the enforced insurances they must have, plus the fact that they literally cannot escape living under welfare (this is caused by the fact that if they make too much they lose out on welfare, and how much they make from their job isn't enough to pay all the bills or feed their kids, so they're forced to remain low-income or jobless in order to receive welfare in order to actually survive). And this is despite the fact that they actually want to work for a living and work their way up the chain.

Did this neighborhood become poor in 2008-2010? How exactly are they blaming the insurance mandate? Did your state expand Medicaid? Lots of people want to work for a living. Know what doesn't help? Voting Republican. Who gut programs that help people get out of poverty and end up destroying jobs in these areas.

If you're asking me to understand the plight? I get that. But the solution they're taking is basically voting for a would-be strongman dictator who is flagrantly racist.

Since the democratic party isn't giving them options to get out of the cycle of welfare they're pushed under, the only other option they have is the republican party that is promising change (Even if it's under false pretenses).

I'm sorry...what?

Yet, they still don't agree with all of the party's actions nor do they agree with shit like this happening. They're just uninformed like most people are, republican and democrat.

No. This is no longer going to fly. We had eight years of Bush. We have Trump's campaign. This isn't down to reasonable people disagreeing, this is people continuously blaming minorities for their plights instead of the actual culprits.

If they don't want to be thrown under the bus? Where were these reasonable people in 2008? In 2010? In 2012? Now?

TacticalFox88 from USA Since: Nov, 2010 Relationship Status: Dating the Doctor
Greenmantle V from Greater Wessex, Britannia Since: Feb, 2010 Relationship Status: Hiding
V
#147475: Oct 31st 2016 at 12:48:56 PM

@ Falrinn:

....Honestly if Hillary actually had a way to bring 650 million people into the country in a week, I'd probably consider that a reason to vote for her. The kind of large-scale coordination you would need to achieve such a massive movement of people in such a short length of time without killing half of them in the process is a mark of a legendary leader.

You'd probably need every single ship and aircraft on the planet to move anywhere near that number of people in anywhere near a week (even a million would be almost impossible).

Keep Rolling On

Total posts: 417,856
Top