Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Science Fiction is almost always better at showing how humanity actually is during the time period it is made than regular fiction made in the same time period. For example, Star Trek was the Trope Maker for Morality Plays with a Pulp Sci-Fi coat of paint.
Wizard Needs Food BadlyAn actual story for that incident, if it helps.
Incidentally, I hope Duckworth crushes him in the election.
edited 27th Oct '16 8:28:12 PM by sgamer82
538 has Duckworth ten points ahead and with a 91.8% chance of winning. Of the six polls they've collected for the Illinois Senate race, only one shows Kirk ahead- and that was taken in July, and he was only slightly ahead in that. That's the biggest lead against an incumbent Senator anywhere; only Wisconsin even comes close.
She is going to crush him.
edited 27th Oct '16 8:42:04 PM by Gilphon
In fairness regarding that tweet, 1) it was done back in March, and 2) it was more along the lines of an ill-advised turn of phrase rather than making light of her injury
, similar to the infamous headline "A chink in the armor" regarding a basketball player who was Chinese. Both are rather common turns of phrase (the latter was mocked on Scrubs, for example), but the context made them supremely distasteful.
There's one common thing across all media, no matter your skin color, your religion, your sexual identity, we are all united in our want to get clever titles published. Some of us just have a very poor understanding of clever.
@texas: I can't even imagine the amount of salt that would happen if Clinton grabs texas. The internet would be on fire for weeks.
Is using "Julian Assange is a Hillary butt plug" an acceptable signature quote?Remember Trump has already threatened the peaceful transition of power and riots are expected, combine that with the salt from a loss of Texas and things will get ugly, because you can bet Trump's people would ascribed any Texas loss (well any loss, but Texas in particular) to illegal immigrants voting for Clinton.
edited 27th Oct '16 9:56:40 PM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranThe Republican party has fucking hated veterans for as long as I've been old enough to pay attention. It's nothing new. It doesn't have anything directly to do with racism either, they just hate the sort of safety net programs that someone without legs, or with PTSD or whatever, would obviously need. They like to pay lip service, but their attitude towards the military has always been less "we owe a lot to our fighting men and women" and more "die for us, peasant scum."
edited 27th Oct '16 10:02:09 PM by Clarste
Texas is the key to a Clinton landslide. If she wins there, it means she won enough of the vote nationally to derail any narrative of her stealing her election that's believed by anyone with anything even vaguely resembling a grasp on reality.
But, well, this poll would be weighted against 25 polls that show Trump in the lead.
You know, something that's really starting to bother me (and has probably bothered a lot of you for awhile) is how people act like they're owed a candidate putting on a show for them or making them feel warm and fuzzy inside, otherwise what point is there in voting.
I overheard some girls talking about how if this year is your first time voting, and this is your field, why would you even bother. Compared to with Obama (and I assume if Sanders had been nominated). And while I get it, that it really does come down to that for so many people is incredibly frustrating.
Like I said, I'm sure this is old news for a lot of you, but I only really started thinking of it in those terms fairly recently.
Straight out of the shithole that /pol/ is, they launched a Draft Our Daughters hashtag with pictures of women serving the military with captions implying they will fight a war against Russia and fight and die for Hillary. All using the slogans and icons from the HRC campaign.
Some of those are rather amusing though, some are specifically tailored to trigger whoever is fervently against women in the military, while others imply the fight for equality will be an armed fight.
Inter arma enim silent legesTrue, but it's important to note the situation in individual states. Going by 538's analysis of who’s ahead in each state and by how much
, and sorting it by expected margin of victory, note the gap between Pennsylvania (D +6.4) - which gives Clinton the necessary 270 - and Nevada (D +2.8).
This goes back to what I thought be the most likely cause of a Trump loss, even back in September when things were closer: he's just not making inroads to any of the one likely Democrat-voting state he would need to win, even if he flipped every toss-up.
edited 28th Oct '16 12:01:37 AM by Eschaton

Obama's approval ratings are now higher than Reagan's were in 88.
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/27/politics/obama-approval-presidential-polls/index.html
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.