Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
![]()
It's the shared batshit section of the political curve. Not that surprising when you look at it like that.
https://first-draft.com/2016/10/24/tweet-of-the-day-david-duke-hearts-julian-assange/
edited 24th Oct '16 1:15:18 AM by BearyScary
Do not obey in advance.Speaking of batshit insane,
Jill Stein is giving interviews on Infowars
List of previous Stein sins:
1) Fan of Assange and Wikileaks 2) Fan of Putin 3) Accused John Oliver of being an HRC shill
Yeah, I haven't exactly been shy about how much I like Last Week Tonight.
edited 24th Oct '16 1:32:56 AM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprised![]()
Now, if she had said Trevor Noah, then she'd be absolutely right. But I don't remember Oliver disappointing me in that way.
Sheltered Granny Hillary jokes!
Hillary is definitely a Schyler sister figure; Angelica and Eliza rolled up into one. Complete with her young scrappy and hungry husband getting a well-publicized affair, though he wasn't stupid enough to publicize it himself!
edited 24th Oct '16 1:44:53 AM by TheHandle
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.
It was in response to his segment on Third Parties. During a townhall interview with The Young Turks, she accused him of being in the tank for HRC just because he pointed out the flaws in her plan to cancel student debt — flaws she didn't actually address properly. Never mind that in that very segment he described HRC as a "hawkish establishment figure who many see as the embodiment of everything wrong with American politics."
edited 24th Oct '16 2:07:25 AM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprised
TBF, he also pointed out in his "Scandals" segment that HRC's "scandals" are more or less nothingburgers, while Trump's scandals are very real and dwarf hers in magnitude and number. He at least had the good sense to avoid the False Equivalence crap so prevalent in cable news.
edited 24th Oct '16 3:49:25 AM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprised![]()
![]()
I'd say it's quite accurate. The Clintons are among the most successful examples of cynical, unprincipled realpolitik in our modern political system. That's not necessarily bad, there's a time and a place for that sort of soulless pragmatism, but it's really not what we need now. Clinton never once broke off from the beltway consensus in a significant way during her decades of political service, and I expect her presidency will be more or less the same.
The populist uprising we're seeing in the west isn't going anywhere, and one way or another over the coming decades, it's going to overcome the political status quo. Or perhaps just as likely, we'll see a clamping down on political freedoms, increasingly opaque elections, and massive waves of political imprisonments as the powerful become increasingly disillusioned with democracy.
There may still be room for a compromise in certain political systems, but I fear it's already too late to stop what's been set in motion in the United States.
edited 24th Oct '16 7:20:37 AM by CaptainCapsase
The cognitive dissonance is strong with Hillary haters. She's somehow a weak and ineffectual old lady on death's door who can't walk straight and an evil demon witch queen who has people killed at the drop of a hat and is poised to establish a new world order.
edited 24th Oct '16 5:42:21 AM by M84
Disgusted, but not surprisedAnd I think it’s going to be very challenging for the GOP, because you have got some Trump voters who are unwilling to vote for a Republican for Senate or Congress as a way to send a message to the establishment, and you have got some independents who want to vote Republican for the Senate and the House, but won’t because they’re too connected to Donald Trump.
With only 17 days to go, I have not seen an election like this, where there is so much intraparty battles going on at a time when the Republicans should be focused on the Democrats and prosecuting the case against their leadership.
edited 24th Oct '16 6:20:19 AM by NoName999
Donald Trump picks up a key newspaper endorsement: the Las Vegas Review-Journal, owned by his buddy, Sheldon Adelson
, bringing his total to... four, I believe.
Yes, the billionaire Adelson thinks that we need to disrupt the "privileged, back-scratching political elites", which he (like Trump) knows all about, having been a principal money masseuse for the Republican Party.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"People keep talking like this is new, like this is a decadent development, when it's Older Than Dirt. They wanna be in the room where it happens, where the sausage is made.
It tends to go in cycles. Throughout the history of democracy there's been a struggle between popular forces of various stripes and insiders who would very much prefer to be governing an oligarchy with absolutely no democratic input by the vast majority of the population.
edited 24th Oct '16 7:38:06 AM by CaptainCapsase
The funny thing is, even assuming this is true, I don't really have much problem with any of it. I don't particularly care about being "friendly with Wall Street" because it apparently hasn't had a huge impact on her policy decisions and thinking, and I don't really care about being antagonistic to groups just for the sake of being "progressive".
While she does represent what many Americans hate about politics, what many Americans hate about politics is frankly stupid and misdirected a lot of the time.
As has been said in this thread, hawkishness is relative, and people who bring it up never really seem to have a reason besides never wanted military force used at all. At least, in my experience when discussing it with people.
edited 24th Oct '16 8:04:00 AM by LSBK
