Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/where-they-stand-clinton-trump-on-the-issues/ar-AAjfZUk
An article I saw posted elsewhere. It's originally from AP and covers Clinton's and Trump's stances on thirty seven different issues.
Personally, I think this election's long past the point where the candidates' stances on any given issue is secondary or even irrelevant, but still an interesting read
edited 22nd Oct '16 2:48:11 PM by sgamer82
Obama appointing Hillary as Secretary of State was genius in so many ways, it's hard to fathom how he NOT couldn't have chosen her. Essentially he,:
A) Got rid of a potential headache in the Senate. True she campaigned for him in the General, but that doesn't mean she has to toe the line of his administration 24/7
B) Chose arguably the most well known woman on Earth to be by and large the most powerful diplomat in the world.
C)Set in motion for them to develop a genuine bond of friendship. Every source from magazines such as NY Ts, the Wa Po, etc conclude that the So S position forced the two to work together and that the friendship between the two is genuine. Obama is not only campaigning to secure his legacy, this is for a personal friend.
D) Boosted Hillary's credentials exponentially. While she was no slouch in 08, being So S brought her four years of raw, in-depth, nitty-gritty Foreign Policy experience that most simply do not have unless their former military commanders and/or influential ambassadors
E)She would see the mistakes that Obama would make and work to correct them whenever possible if she were to run in 2016.
F)Essentially would give her his blueprint for her race in 2016, with policy wonks, campaign strategists, among others. She's remarkably disciplined even more so than usual.
edited 22nd Oct '16 2:58:05 PM by TacticalFox88
New Survey coming this weekend!Reportedly she wanted a break, and it's almost customary for Sec States to step down after one-term.
Had an approval rating in the high 60s too.
New Survey coming this weekend!If this is true, why the hell would Clinton do that? She isn't up by that much and if she takes Florida its over, even if Ohio and Iowa (and even Nevada and North Carolina) go Trump. She clearly can win Florida, so its not a strategic retreat to focus on other states.
EDIT: Wait a goddamn minute, just checked that Twitter feed for myself. The guy is a hardcore Trump supporter. With tweets such as Listening to Hillary speak, she could literally say, "I've just shat my drawers," and the crowd would cheer.
He's blowing smoke.
edited 22nd Oct '16 4:06:17 PM by Rationalinsanity
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.I could see Clinton logically pulling out of Iowa, but she's been campaigning in Ohio so she's clearly trying to sweep as many swing states as she can. And she's running at least a token campaign in Utah, Georgia and Texas.
If she's running in deep red states, she's running in Florida. It's not like the Clinton war chest is running low.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.![]()
![]()
Sounds like the guy is projecting.
The amount of projection, false equivalence, and double standards are off the scale in this election.
edited 22nd Oct '16 4:17:06 PM by BearyScary
Do not obey in advance.Even if it's a landslide, the underlying problems aren't going away. You can't just magically wish away 35% of America. The only thing that could really help is better economic opportunities, but that's a decades long process.
edited 22nd Oct '16 4:51:08 PM by storyyeller
Blind Final Fantasy 6 Let's Play![]()
,
yes, but given the historical precedents of landslides, it'd basically tell people in politics, that Trump's strategies/goals/everything are nonviable, and those crazier people lose power.
the political landscape of US would move, in general, to the left, putting us back on track to a more centrist/moderate government.
edited 22nd Oct '16 4:53:38 PM by Jetyl
I'm afraid I can't explain myself, sir. Because I am not myself, you see?![]()
![]()
Disagree. Their base is batshit fucking crazy. No one reasonable is making it out of the primaries.
It's only get worse as the GOP is going to feel the need to pander to delegitimize HRC's presidency, further driving all the reasonable people and minorities to Democrats.
It only takes a person voting for the same party 2-3 cycles for them to become party loyalists. Do that enough with Hispanics and its GG.
edited 22nd Oct '16 5:06:04 PM by TacticalFox88
New Survey coming this weekend!Shifting demographics could go a long way but (assuming that the GOP doesn't implode/split/reform) I'm not sure that the US is set up to become a de facto one party democracy (ala Japan) at the federal level. The Democrats don't totally dominate enough states yet.
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.

When Obama appointed Hillary for Secretary of State, was he setting her up in part for another Presidential run?
Do not obey in advance.