Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
It is surely bound to piss off even further the classic cold war Republicans who despise anything related to Russia or the Soviet Union though. As much as there are similarities between the Go P and the Putin, the older elements of the Go P still sees him as an enemy of sorts and Russia as a rival to the US instead of an ally or role model.
Inter arma enim silent legesYes, but if Trump (or more accurately his handlers) are clever, when Clinton tries to call him on that, he'll frame her and by the extension the democrats as stuck fighting the cold war.
Trumps campaign strategy has generally been, in contrast to Karl Rove's "Make my opponent's strengths his weakness." something along the lines of "Make my own weaknesses my opponent's."
edited 7th Sep '16 7:37:35 PM by CaptainCapsase
Even then if Trump and his handlers claim it is Cold War sucking, there is plenty of things you can pin on Putin that only neo fascists would want, like restricting the media, an even bigger crony state, curbing political dissent and a state notorious with privacy invasion.
Putin endorsing Trump and Trump's admiration towards putting can be well played as the Kremlin having its sway inside American politics and Putin's authoritarian stances being something Trump would emulate if he gets presidency could be pretty much turned against him if presented as something that every blue and red bloodied can dislike: an authoritarian foreign influenced tyrant.
Hillary could simply imply that Trump would turn the US into the rotten bureaucratic corrupt big state that Russia is without playing the Cold War Card.
Inter arma enim silent legesRomney tweets out he hopes Johnson and Bill Weld get a chance to participate in the debates.
Actual quote: "In the meantime, she has 33,000 emails that she deleted. When is she going to release her emails? She probably knows how to find it."
I don't think Trump understands what the word "deleted" means.
I want her to follow the campaign and set up a taco truck on the corner of every rally Trump holds until November. That's great.
With the government recently declaring an end to private prisons, are prison lobbies even going to be a thing anymore?
I don't know what I expected Pence to do during this campaign, but whining about people being mean to Trump certainly wasn't it. I would make a crack about him being reduced to Trump's cheerleader but credit where it's due, cheerleading is hard-ass work. Those womenHey! are f*cking athletes and don't deserve to be disparaged like that.
Yes Sanders was a good enough fit that had he become the candidate the folks rage quiting instead of voting for him would have been being idiots, but he lost, so the idiots are the ones rage quiting instead of voting for Clinton.
I have seriously never understood the logic that a candidate who can't even win in the primary would be "more electable". Yes, the guy who can't even convince ''his own party'' to vote for him, he's the one that's going to win enough moderates and opposition to tip the scale and win the day.
Yeah. I mean, we constantly mock Trump for this. "On my first day in office, on my FIRST day, all the immigrants will be gone. All of them. Every single one will be removed from the country on my first day."
It would be no less worthy of ridicule if he was a Democrat boasting, "On my first day in office, racism will be solved. I'm going to solve all the racism. Cops are no longer going to be shooting black kids in the street. Minorities will have equal access to all the opportunities. There will be no racial tension anymore, the white nationalists will all change their minds and stop trying to hurt other groups. It's all gonna be gone, and it will happen immediately on the day I take office."
Anyone who promises you an immediate solution is selling snake oil. He's either lying to your face or he's an idiot who has no idea how complex a political system or a social structure actually is. Possibly both.
I think that I would absolutely be willing to consider voting for John Mc Cain if the GOP were to spontaneously announce that they're showing Trump the door and making him their candidate.
Not saying I would vote for him against Hillary. But I wouldn't dismiss it out of hand the way I do Trump and Cruz. I'd be open to hearing more of his policies and ideas.
edited 7th Sep '16 9:26:04 PM by TobiasDrake
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Eh, I don't think I'd vote for Mc Cain even if he was running as a relative moderate. I don't think I can trust any of the current Republican politicians when it comes to Civil Rights. Even if they aren't saying blatantly offensive things like Trump I expect they'll stick pretty close to the party line.
What happened to the contempt for Marco Rubio, aka that candidate everyone agreed was so-so? He brought this country together in trying to figure out whether he was a likeable candidate.
Let's make him the GOP candidate. Then the Republicans might actually win for once.
Note that this is a joke.
edited 7th Sep '16 9:51:57 PM by golgothasArisen
"If you spend all your heart / On something that has died / You are not alive and that can't be a life"I do miss the 2008 election, when even though I voted for Obama, the prospect of Mc Cain winning didn't seem like the worst thing in the world, either. You could trust him to be competent at the job if nothing else.
This election, even putting aside policy issues, the difference in experience and credentials between the two candidates is just mind blowing. Hillary has pretty much the best resume you could ask for short of serving as Vice President, while Trump has zero political experience and a record of failed businesses and bankruptcies in the private sector.
edited 7th Sep '16 9:56:53 PM by RavenWilder
If Mc Cain was the President we would've invaded both Iran and Syria by now which would've made Iraq look like a minor skirmish.
I don't trust ANY of the Republicans with the White House. Four years is a long, LONG time.
New Survey coming this weekend!Mc Cain is a mixed bag, many in the Go P consider him a RINO and the Alt-right would loathe him.
http://www.ontheissues.org/John_McCain.htm
A quick summation so far
A bit mixed bag on abortion due to being a pro-lifer but lax on abortion when it endangers the mother and lax on stem cell research and voted "no" on an act that would cut funding to sex-ed.
Fiscal conservative and anti-debt but in favor of regulating speculative markets and regularizing the financial sector and protecting homeowners from foreclosures.
Surprisingly progressive in racial and legal immigration including laws on women protection and affirmative action, no quotas and direct federal funding though, but still defends state rights to deal with same sex partners marriage although he doesn't defend a ban on same sex marriage at federal level.
Focus on small business and tax cuts for small business.
Though on crime in general including no protection for hate crime but shown to be in favor of community police and less shitty police forces. Still supports the war on drugs though.
And so on.
He is still a Republican but he isn't at least associated with the racist sectors of the Go P and is fairly progressive for a conservative. Essentially he falls on the reasonable side of politics considering his party, by far more likable than any other Go P candidate since 2008.
edited 7th Sep '16 10:23:04 PM by AngelusNox
Inter arma enim silent legesThe problem is that he's gone extremely senile since 2008, started drinking the Tea and spouting stupid things about Obama (not to mention the embarrassment of picking Sarah Palin to balance his ticket) - you can only be surrounded by other Republicans for so long before you start to become just like them.

Definitely in favor of Selective Service for women. In any instance in which we actually resort to the draft, women should share the burden to the extent of their capabilities. If an individual woman proves physically unfit for combat duty, she can be assigned another job or discharged.
Fighteer, if you are not getting your basic needs met (food, water, shelter, security), you have no obligation to abide by any kind of social contract that doesn't provide them for you. That's just common sense (and John Locke).
Hence, when blacks are facing what amounts to state-sponsored terrorism against their communities, saying that they should just wait for Clinton to fix it slowly and incrementally is an unreasonable request even if it's the better way, because it sure as hell isn't the better way for the people who are being gunned down now.