Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
![]()
Ohhhhh, okay. Yeah, "authoritarianism" usually strikes me as something that gets championed by those who rather hate dissent of any kind. Thanks for the context.
Hillary's getting flak from the right for a charity that nobody can prove is doing anything wrong (and is in fact rated extremely highly by the best-known charity watchdogs) and an email scandal in which she was absolved of wrongdoing on multiple fronts. If she's suffering slightly in the polls just for that, what do you think the right would do with Bernie, the self-avowed socialist and agnostic. Like, the Republican Bernie talking points write themselves. As a political opponent, Bernie's like a Republican's wet dream.
New Survey coming this weekend!Well, I don't know about "sheeple", that's a bit of an overstatement. No massive bleating of FOUR LEGS GOOD TWO LEGS BETTER here, but let me put it this way. Few of us are high-level experts; we're not academics, researchers, campaign managers, journalists, or otherwise at the cutting edge of either information suppy or idea creation. At best, we brood what we've been taught in school, and what we get from the press and other media, and anecdotal experience.
I know for a fact that I had no original thoughts about Clinton, mainly because I knew very little about her, and all I knew was second hand. When everyone had disliked her, I disliked her. When all that effort got spent into humanising her at the convention, I bought into it. I never realized I was doing either until it was pointed out to me. For which I feel ashamed and embarassed.
This isn't the first time it happens to me. While I like to think that maybe I'm giving myself too much credit, at the moment, I believe that this is more common than just me.
We're not sheeple. We do try, and we do care. But let's not overestimate our intellectual agency and integrity, either. As for discussion between us, it's only useful if people are open to changing their minds about things they care about. I know I am. I can't speak for others.
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.Speak for yourself, I might have failed my degree but I've still got a diploma in Politics and International Relations, plus years of constant researching and learning to back me up, that's before we get into my personal campaigning expierance and time working as part of political operations.
You may not be confident in your ability to think original thoughts and that's fine, but don't go projecting your insecurities onto the rest of us.
edited 7th Sep '16 4:06:57 PM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranFine, I'm a statist, social-liberal. Now I'm in a neat bucket that can be argued for or against instead of what I've actually said.
As for how we acquire knowledge, of course that's trivially true, Handle, but treating it as a cause for absolute despair because none of us can ever access the Real Truth is just defeatist. It is possible to gain reasonably certain knowledge by diligent vetting of sources and seeking out corroboration. Even with that aside, if we're all incapable of seeing past the propaganda even if we choose different propaganda to believe in, that means that engaging in this conversation is pointless. If you believe that to be true, then by all means quit engaging. Let us exchange propaganda in happy ignorance.
edited 7th Sep '16 4:13:25 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"When Handle first made his post I thought he was talking more about this place being an echo chamber where no new or revolutionary ideas come from.
That his main point was that none of us have the critical thinking skills to actually make our own minds up seems more insulting, even if that is something I worry about a bit.
No one is exempt from having biases or occasionally slipping into groupthink. There's a huge body of psychology and neuroscience backing this up. Confirmation bias is one of the big ones. The only antidote is rigorous skepticisim and regular, rigorous self-examination, and even someone who thinks they're good at it is going to falter sometimes.
edited 7th Sep '16 4:18:57 PM by Elle
@Fighteer:, You're rather quick to try and silence me, aren't you? If it's not the mod stick, it's my own "despair". That's a funny way of spelling "concern" or "discomfort" , by the way.
@Silas: I did say "few of us", but fair enough. However, can you guarantee that you aren't perpetuating your sources' and teachers' biases? What about stuff you didn't study? Is the ability to write papers for a grade equivalent to creating original opinions from first hand knowledge?
edited 7th Sep '16 4:21:39 PM by TheHandle
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.This was a sentiment I expressed earlier that was met with very serious backlash. A big part of it had to do with the analogy I was using (and while I'm sorry for being rather insensitive about it, I don' think I was necessarily incorrect, just undiplomatic), but I think part of it was the fact that people really don't like to examine deeply held beliefs, attitudes, and biases (and exposing oneself to opposed perspectives); that kind of introspection is deeply uncomfortable, understandably so, but I maintain that doing so is very necessary avoid developing major biases.
edited 7th Sep '16 4:25:08 PM by CaptainCapsase
@Irene: But what is knowledge? Is it truly something we can achieve through inductive reasoning?
edited 7th Sep '16 4:31:58 PM by CaptainCapsase
![]()
What about in some bizzaro world where Ron Paul wins the nomination though, or as a better thought experiment some hypothetical anti-military Republican who shares virtually all other values with them?
It is, but in the context of the thread I think it's somewhat pertinent considering the discussion about confronting our own biases.
edited 7th Sep '16 4:33:41 PM by CaptainCapsase
It's still irrelevant to this thread anyway since the whole point was that you should actually argue the other poster's points, and not because they happen to not be the most original opinion ever. And that point is pretty clear anyway, so let's move on.
There was something about Jill Stein?
Shadow?Well for those who want to dive into it deeper, here, Crash Course is doing a pholosophy series, inductive reasoning is covered in episode 3 and the following episodes cover most of the major topics of epistemology
.
However, my short, layman's answer? We do the best we can with what we've got. What we've got is flawed but with persistence and rigor I do believe we can approach an increasing understanding of truth. (That said, most people are neither persistent nor rigorous, it's something you have to learn.)
![]()
Good. That kind of childish vandalism should be punished/stopped. It's a little ridiculous to resort to that when it doesn't take much beyond money and halfway decent acting to make a proper promotional message. You yourself barely have to do much besides having a good picture to show and saying "I am [Name] and I approve this message." Resorting to vandalism is ridiculous and laughable.
