Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Taking nukes "off the table" can refer to a lot of things. First strikes were really only threatening when radar was in infancy and satellites were shite. We now live in a world where we'd have a good chunk of time to respond to a nuclear strike and therefore destroy all of humanity. Yay!
In all seriousness who exactly are we worried about nuking us? The russians? Putin's crazy but not crazy. North Korea? Don't make me laugh. ISIS? They have neither the resources/skills to develop nuclear weapons (or missiles for that matter) and even if they did somehow get a nuclear warhead your looking at a smuggle'n'boom scenario which first strike policy wouldn't combat either.
Is using "Julian Assange is a Hillary butt plug" an acceptable signature quote?Nor would there be any tangible target to nuke in retaliation for a terrorist bomb.
Let's face it: the only way nuclear weapons can retain any strategic value is if they are maintained but never used, since the first nation to do so loses.
Moving back to the original topic: the only reason these statements by Hillary are controversial in any way is because they've been run through the spin machine by people who have a preexisting bias against her. Hell, Joe Biden says far less sensitive things off the cuff, and he gets a pass as "Ol' Folksy Joe". There's an ineluctible gender component to this criticism as well as an intense worship of the appearance of being "fair and balanced".
edited 24th Aug '16 9:20:22 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"I don't mean any disrespect, but sometimes I feel that those who vote for the third party candidates seem to do it as a not-so-smart way to get back at the system and the so-called elites rather than a genuine support for those candidates.
Only an experienced editor who has a name possesses the ability to truly understand my work - What 90% of writers I'm in charge of said.
That's also a point: when you have to go back 20 years to find something that Clinton said that might have been inappropriate or insensitive, whereas for Trump it's a question of finding a day in the current week when he didn't do that, the insistence that this is a "choice between two evils" becomes increasingly dishonest.
edited 24th Aug '16 9:22:30 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"https://www.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/4zd07t/my_writing_in_the_huffington_post_salon_and_the/
Probably the most delusional "journalist" I've ever seen. Some of the replies in there are baffling.
New Survey coming this weekend!
It's r/politics, delusions are kind of the norm there.
Oh, and here's Jill Stein claiming that "wireless" causes cancer
.
What a loon. We all know Wi-Fi signals are the key to The Glorious Ascension.
edited 24th Aug '16 9:47:46 AM by Protagonist506
Leviticus 19:34Rush Limbaugh is warning of federally funded lesbian farmers invading conservative farming states
. How exactly this guy still has a wife, I have zero clue.
I wonder if she keeps her cellphone in a faraday cage to limit her exposure to it's harmful waves.
It really shouldn't surprise me that there is this big anti-science block in my camp but it still kinda stings. I became progressive because I looked at the evidence and I can't help but feel like there's a not insignificant portion of the movement are just here because they distrust big corporations more then they distrust the government. I think I'm empathizing with moderate republicans right now you guzie. halp
Is using "Julian Assange is a Hillary butt plug" an acceptable signature quote?I would say that there is a certain demographic of so-called progressives that are mostly motivated by a dislike of various things they consider trappings of western civilization and "the man", such as technology and science. Essentially, you can think of them as being deluded into thinking they're in a very poorly written cyberpunk story.
To be fair, there's a similar demographic for conservatives that thinks they're in a prequel to a left-behind esque story.
Leviticus 19:34Thankfully I intend to vote Hillary anyway, and it's not even cause I'm a Democrat. It's because "holy shit, this guy is nuts" is the only other viable candidate at this time.
Yeah. At worst, Hillary might move our country backwards a bit, but the same can only be said of Donald Trump in the sense that Adolf Hitler was "A minor step in the wrong direction" for Germany.
I mean, a big part of that is the fact that many of us are at a loss for a single Republican politician we can point to and go, "Yeah, he's pretty good. I like the cut of his jib." When Republicans are spoken positively of in this thread, it's usually only because they're supporting Hillary or opposing Trump, and it's often people we've reviled in the past - like the Bush family.
Most of us don't live in actual mortal terror of Democrat leadership.
They clearly weren't paying attention when Trump tried to have Judge Curiel removed from his Trump University lawsuit on grounds that because Curiel is Hispanic, he cannot be considered an unbiased party because all Hispanics support illegal immigration and have it in for him over his plans to build a wall.
Trump has made it clear that his prejudice against Hispanics does not stop at the words "legal citizen".
So all we have to do is throw in Texas? SOLD!
Sure, do that. I'm sure Putin is just as understanding and idealistic as you are. Let's ignore that the threat of nuclear warfare stopped humanity as a species from destroying ourselves several times over?
That nuclear weapons are off the table is standard political policy that every politician believes in. It's also part of the Geneva Convention. The rule of nuclear weapons is that under NO CIRCUMSTANCES are you to ever employ them unless another country already is. Anyone who launches a nuke will be destroyed with extreme prejudice by everyone. It's called Mutually-Assured Destruction and it's the reason the world didn't end during the Cold War.
The only person questioning it is Trump, who's expressed confusion on why he shouldn't just drop nukes on American enemies overseas. Which is why Trump is an active threat to the survival of global civilization: he's too stupid and fundamentally opposed to all things political to really get MAD and seems to think the nuclear Holocaust is something he can charm his way out of.
edited 24th Aug '16 10:42:18 AM by TobiasDrake
My Tumblr. Currently side-by-side liveblogging Digimon Adventure, sub vs dub.Yeah they're called hipsters, IR hipsters are a massive pain in the arse.
Sure, but that doesn't actually excuse Fox's constant calls for a purge "by any means necessary".
edited 24th Aug '16 11:03:49 AM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranNigel Farage is set to speak at a Trump rally.
http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37177938
edited 24th Aug '16 11:04:07 AM by Rationalinsanity
Politics is the skilled use of blunt objects.![]()
![]()
There's a big chunk of genuine Luddites in there, who are divided from the right mainly by social issues.
I don't disagree that the modern GOP is badly in need of a purge, but one of our basic rules here is that we must refrain from advocating harm to any person.
edited 24th Aug '16 11:05:39 AM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Re: the Libertarian Party's convention.
I'm still waiting for that Petersen delegate to cut his own throat, like he vowed. Johnson won. It's time for him to put his money where his mouth is and his blade where his throat is.
edited 24th Aug '16 11:11:25 AM by CrimsonZephyr
"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."

I'm sure some of us would do that but I'm not sure if anyone can be bothered to find batty quotes from the third-party candidates.
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran