Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
You can do that? Facebook's gotten fancy since I started using it as a shitty messenger service.
And to open a side topic: Does anyone remember when people needed to hide behind anonymity to be racist shitbags? I basically checked out of mainstream internetting a few years ago but facebook was supposed to be your squeaky clean front for when employers google you. We made reddit for a reason, dammit!
Is using "Julian Assange is a Hillary butt plug" an acceptable signature quote?
Breivik was the asshole that killed 70+ children because he hated liberals "polluting" his country.
And regarding Khan's alleged support of Sharia (which is the narrative being spun by spokeswoman Katrina Pierson
[only after she got fact-checked by Wolf Blitzer for blaming his death on Obama, in spite of his death occurring 5 years before Obama took office
] and Breitbart), I looked up Breitbart's sources, both of which dated back to 1983.
First is a short paper on a Human Rights seminar held in Pakistan, in which he did give praise to Dr. Brohi for making a "convincing argument"
- what said argument consisted of is omitted from the paper, but Breitbart alleges that it later inspired the Taliban's system prior to the US invasion.
Second is the much longer Jurisitic classification of Islamic Law
which is A) dry as sand, and B) basically a scholarly examination of the sources of Islamic laws, their later effects through the centuries (including a citation of the early caliphates who basically utilized the same setup of Precedent that the US Supreme Court does, but no direct comparison is made), and as for Breitbart's claim that Khizr Khan Believes the Constitution ‘Must Always Be Subordinated to the Sharia’? The text never once mentions the Constitution, and after reading most of it it doesn't seem like he even mentions secular law at all while examining Islamic Law... which kind of makes sense, given the narrow scope of the paper.
And complicating the right-wing interpretation is the fact that the text takes a distinctly objective tone, as indicated by use of phrases like "The present form of the Quran is one and the same in every part of the Muslim world, and it has been so through all the centuries. This, Muslims believe, is due to the fact that the compilation and arrangement of chapters was completed—under divine instructions—by the prophet himself." Seriously, the paper could have been written by a Christian, Buddhist, or Atheist with the type of dry tone it utilizes.
edited 3rd Aug '16 8:18:15 PM by ironballs16
"Why would I inflict myself on somebody else?"They endorse infanticide?! What's this, The Turner Diaries?
edited 3rd Aug '16 8:16:16 PM by TheHandle
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.Oh, and there's also one major caveat that Khan puts down into that paper after discussing the history of the Quran.
Funny how Trump supporters keep claiming that the mainstream media is peddling lies to make Trump look bad, when it's their dispenser of truth doing the mental gymnastics. This would seem appropriate
.
A former US nuclear launch officer on why it would be extremely disturbing if Trump's alleged belief in nuclear first use is true
. How sheltered must you be to think that nuclear weapons can be used with minimal provocation? How sheltered must you be to think that this is "just another smear campaign" and not think of why this would even be brought up?
I cannot believe that there is a person who might become President in three months that doesn't understand why we can't just lob nukes around like fucking water balloons.
My various fanfics.Even Lex Luthor is more credible as a POTUS candidate.
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.It probably goes without saying that Trump has never been anywhere near a dynamite blast in his entire, sheltered, privileged life. A single kilo of TNT makes a mighty big bang, if you're standing too close to it. He therefore cannot fathom what a multi-megaton nuke would do...
This Space Intentionally Left Blank.![]()
Hell, Lex Luthor would be a better president. At least he knows how to make plans and stick to it and not constantly shoot himself in the foot.
edited 3rd Aug '16 8:43:08 PM by nightwyrm_zero
I am more qualified than him based on my countless failures in playing Sim City.
On mental gymnastics the argument I hate the most is how Trump supporters want to pin the Iraq War II: Electric Boogaloo, solely on Hillary when 77 people voted for the War and a couple dozen didn't, as if she was the one who proposed and was the only one responsible for green lighting the war.
Inter arma enim silent legesYou know the weirdest thing about that? Trump's a New Yorker (even if he makes people think of New Jersey). He, of all people, should know that New York City didn't just want to deal with Al Queda, they wanted revenge. If the state senator moved against that, they'd be in so much trouble.
Although, I'm betting that Trump wasn't all that effected by 9/11 because he seems really flippant about it whenever it comes up. Even in old interviews, when asked about war with Iraq, his response was basically "yeah, sure, whatever. Next topic."
![]()
Trump once confused 9/11 with 7/11.
He's not a human being. He's a mountain of lies and apathy.
My various fanfics.IIRC, Trump was actually supporting the Iraq war before Bush was.
On a side note, I'm really good at Democracy III, so you should vote for me. Seriously, I got 95% popularity before I was assassinated by liberals.
edited 3rd Aug '16 9:04:54 PM by Protagonist506
Leviticus 19:34The key to winning that game is to change the demographics by pushing policies that make people like your ideology more.
But, yeah, if you try to go too fast, those being left behind get murdery, and there's only so much a Secret Service can do.
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.

A stupid amount of people still think Obama was born in kenya and is a secret muslim so for your sanity it's probably better to avoid the idiots. Unless they're your friends and family in which case im so sorry.
Is using "Julian Assange is a Hillary butt plug" an acceptable signature quote?