Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Pointing what you consider flaws isn't demonization either, and it gets annoying when people bring up the same devoid of fact accusations again and again, 9. We're not anti-Sanders here, if he was the candidate the vast majority of us would vote for him because he's clearly better than Trump. Most of us just like Hillary better, for whatever reason.
@Cap; No, it doesn't raise that question. The situations aren't very analogous, for one. For another, people have repeatedly asked for some evidence that said donations have actually influenced her policies and no one that's been asked that question has actually given us much, if anything. From this I conclude it's one of those "mountains out of molehill" situations. Assumptions, are just that, assumptions, guesses, might bes and probablys, and I'm not going to assume she's being bribed for work that lots of people do, or is automatically beholden to industries that quite often donate on both sides of the political spectrum.
edited 2nd Jul '16 5:40:37 PM by AceofSpades
People, check his record.
Have you? Sander's record isn't exactly squeaky clean. He's lucky that he never faced any real scrutiny.
Onto a different subject: Today I saw something I would have never expected: A Sanders For President booth. Of course when I actually talked to them, they talked about stuff like funding pro-Sanders delegates and signing a petition against TPP, rather than seriously thinking he can still win.
Blind Final Fantasy 6 Let's PlayI thought we were moving on?
@LSBK I didn't smear her though. She did come in on the side of gay rights late, she did call African American boys super predators, she did support the Iraq war, she has no intention of being an honest broker in the Israel Palestine conflict, she did drag Monica Lewinsky through the mud when the sex scandal broke out and she has taken millions of dollars from business men who want to game the system. I didn't call her a lunatic (in fact I said she has a good temperament, was experienced and competent), evil and genocidal. I've just been telling the truth.
@Aces Pointing what you consider flaws isn't demonization either, and it gets annoying when people bring up the same devoid of fact accusations again and again, 9.
Pot meet kettle.
@Storyyeller Is Hilary's record better?
edited 2nd Jul '16 5:56:39 PM by 940131
![]()
![]()
He did face serious scrutiny. What came up failed to take off; all of the things you've mentioned, up to and including the NIMBY and Soviet Sympathizer accusation were tossed around by mainstream press for a few days a piece before failing to take off. Clinton herself couldn't pull the red scare card because the democrats are theoretically the left of America, and the GOP had diluted it to the point where it's no longer taken seriously.
edited 2nd Jul '16 5:44:00 PM by CaptainCapsase
Wait, didn't he actually say earlier that Trump was worse than Hillary and Sanders?
Trump is worse on all three counts however, so voting for her is important if you're in a district he can contest.
edited 2nd Jul '16 5:51:21 PM by Ssj3Gojira
Let's see if you can get past my Beelzemon. Mephiles, WARP SHINKA!Yeah, you're basically bringing up slander, 9. Plus it's slander we've all discussed like a dozen times before you showed up, so we're kind of tired of talking about the same old thing again. And the way you repeated these things in nearly every post, which was obnoxious. You're not bringing new or insightful to the conversation so far.
States are always trying to attract buisness. Often they do so in stupid and counterproductive ways, but it's not all that newsworthy.
Blind Final Fantasy 6 Let's Play@Aces What was obnoxious is that you called me a troll for having a different oppinion from you and expecting me to be caught up on over 5000 pages of information, but whatever. My points on Clinton vs Sanders were accurate. Let's move on.
It's not a matter of doubt. It's on the record. You have the intenet. Look it up.
edited 2nd Jul '16 7:38:06 PM by 940131
I doubt the accuracy, myself. But, I'm outside the issue, so my opinion doesn't count.
About that Texas daftness... What it looks like to me: "Gosh, British companies are going to be all spooked about the Brexit. Let's poach some of those willing to abandon ship while the getting of them is good! And, let's just ignore the irony of a place touting for jumping rats... when it's a place that constantly threatens to exit its own Union on a regular basis, whenever it feels like making a point."
edited 2nd Jul '16 7:30:54 PM by Euodiachloris
Some of us get by fine here without "slandering Sanders" by the way, admitedly I also don't throw shit at Clinton so maybe that's why.
Anyway someone bought up gun control and Clinton and I wanted to ask, has she evolved on that? She used to be a big pusher for the AWB being an answer to everything, instead of pushing practical solution like letting the CDC do their job, letting the ATF do their job or bringing in mandatory background checks, or banning private sales.
Clinton's gun politics seems like a good way to anger legitimate gun owners and do nothing to solve the issues the US faces with gun violence.
edited 2nd Jul '16 8:00:59 PM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ Cyran

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rFCKiZdfTpU
Here's the chair that was "thrown" by Bernie supporters by the way.
I was just bringing up facts about Hilary to counter the anti-Sanders crowd, but fine. Let's change the subject.
edited 2nd Jul '16 5:26:03 PM by 940131