Nov 2023 Mod notice:
There may be other, more specific, threads about some aspects of US politics, but this one tends to act as a hub for all sorts of related news and information, so it's usually one of the busiest OTC threads.
If you're new to OTC, it's worth reading the Introduction to On-Topic Conversations
and the On-Topic Conversations debate guidelines
before posting here.
Rumor-based, fear-mongering and/or inflammatory statements that damage the quality of the thread will be thumped. Off-topic posts will also be thumped. Repeat offenders may be suspended.
If time spent moderating this thread remains a distraction from moderation of the wiki itself, the thread will need to be locked. We want to avoid that, so please follow the forum rules
when posting here.
In line with the general forum rules, 'gravedancing' is prohibited here. If you're celebrating someone's death or hoping that they die, your post will get thumped. This rule applies regardless of what the person you're discussing has said or done.
Edited by Mrph1 on Nov 30th 2023 at 11:03:59 AM
Guys, he was shooting up a nightclub at 2:00 AM on a Sunday morning, not walking through the middle of the street in broad daylight. We're talking like 90 seconds to get a gun out of his car and walk to the entrance. Concealability is not an issue here.
And as
said, it wasn't an assault rifle. Assault rifles are automatic weapons by definition. This was semi-auto.
![]()
You know, that Insistent Terminology gambit about what an "assault rifle" is is getting very old. Stop deflecting the issue.
Should we change it to "semi-automatic rifle that kills a lot of people very fast and has no practical defensive use"? That makes these conversations unnecessarily cumbersome.
edited 15th Jun '16 12:36:05 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"You know, that always struck me as a bit wierd. I would always have thought that the logical thing is to force all gun-carriers to open-carry, and anyone caught carrying concealed weapons would be in for nasty legal penalties. Likewise anyone openly carrying in a way that violates gun safety.
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.The rhetoric goes: "But a concealed weapon lets me get the drop on a bad guy." This is the mentality of a person who envisions himself to be a virtuous avenger of American values, ready to whip out his Glock and blow away anyone who dares threaten his precious society.
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"Should we change it to "semi-automatic rifle that kills a lot of people very fast and has no practical defensive use"? That's a bit awkward, and, for the purposes of this conversation, irrelevant.
But proper terminology is important. There's an enormous amount of people who do things like confuse "assault weapon" and "automatic weapon" and as a result think that machine guns are legal in the US since the Assault Weapon Ban expired (which isn't true; machine guns have been essentially banned in the US since the National Firearms Act passed in 1934). If you want to have a proper discussion about the issue, then everyone needs to actually know what things mean when they're said, because otherwise meaningful conversation is impossible.
Or is just existing.
edited 15th Jun '16 12:46:20 PM by NativeJovian
Really from Jupiter, but not an alien.Detachable magazines are also part of the definition.
But as much as I hate the whole semantics/term bullshit it is somewhat important to the discussion given the history of previous gun control attempts.
Given where I live? Yeah, I'd say is very relevant to the conversation. It's one thing to be a gun owner and other to have your conceal carry permit.
edited 15th Jun '16 12:50:22 PM by LeGarcon
Oh really when?![]()
As long as the law-abiding citizens and the folks who are looking for an excuse to gun down brown people are indistinguishable from one another (up until the rounds start flying), I'm afraid that the point you're making is irrelevant.
An overwhelming ratio of the population supports more aggressive gun control laws, so why are Republicans in Congress (and even some Democrats) still stonewalling measures to adopt them?
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"![]()
Thats more testament to where you live then than conceal carry. I know several people who conceal carry, and they are perfectly normal people.
Because there is a not insignificant portion of the population that jumps through all the existing hoops set in order to own a gun who don't want to be punished with more paperwork when they did nothing wrong. They don't want to pay for the actions of a madman. It's the same as punishing all Muslims for the acts of terrorists.
edited 15th Jun '16 12:55:13 PM by FFShinra
Open/Conceal, it doesn't matter to the likes of the madmen who commit these crimes. We've seen both types.
More generally, there is an assumption of malice if you have a weapon out in the open and aren't a uniform LEO or in a rural community. Getting penalized societally simply for having the weapon without intention of using it is a real concern. They ain't all cowboy wannabes.
edited 15th Jun '16 12:59:25 PM by FFShinra
I find that assumption of malice problematic and unfair.
Couldn't the same be said of any group, including "brown people"?
edited 15th Jun '16 1:11:31 PM by TheHandle
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.![]()
There should be such an assumption. We want to shame gun owners into leaving their pieces at home. There is no call for open or concealed carry on U.S. streets unless you fear imminent daily attack, and that indicates a much more serious problem that a bunch of cowboy rednecks can't solve.
edited 15th Jun '16 1:07:07 PM by Fighteer
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"I've said it before but, Le Garcon, you really should stop acting as if everywhere is as shitty as where you live apparently is.
On the terminology debate, that's one of the few areas I think I tend to side more with the "gun activists" or whatever you want to call them. Like, if everyone is using the same, consistent, proper terminology it makes things a lot less confusing. The fact that some people show outright hostility to just calling something what it is has always baffled, regardless of any other positions of theirs I might agree with.
edited 15th Jun '16 1:14:29 PM by LSBK
What hoop? Sorry but what hoops are people meant to have jumped though to be a law abiding gun owner? I'm not talking about getting a concealed papery permit, I'm taking about just owning a gun.
The are no hoops, not really, having someone else run a background check on you isn't a hoop for you to jump though, somebody else does all the work. Hell getting your made Jerry to sell you a gun without a background check certainly isn't a hoop.
The gun rights lot act as if they're already subject to regulation and control when they are not, not st a federal level, and if they live in a state where they do have to jump though hoops then why are they worried? All that's being discussed is maybe making it so that folks in other areas have to jump though the same hoops as them, no hoop increase.
Still when it comes to terminology I have to say we should use the correct terms, deliberatly using the wrong terms for the things we're talking about makes us look like uniformed jackasses.
edited 15th Jun '16 1:14:13 PM by Silasw
“And the Bunny nails it!” ~ Gabrael “If the UN can get through a day without everyone strangling everyone else so can we.” ~ CyranPerhaps what we need is to re-frame the action: they are not "paying for the actions of a madman (or a thousand)
", they are "making a collective sacrifice in order to help protect the community from a thousand madmen". In other words, ask yourself, if stricter gun control is enacted, and this requires from you a greater effort to get and keep your guns, isn't that effort worth it for the sake of saving thousands of innocent lives every year?
Plus, how many hoops are those, really? This Al Quaeda spokesman seems to think little of them...
What are they waiting for, indeed?
edited 15th Jun '16 1:14:05 PM by TheHandle
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.![]()
![]()
I live where all the guns come from. Shit tons of weapons both illegal and not are moved through Wilmington all the time. And heroin.
This where most of the gun owners live, where most of the black market acquires their stock, and where the most abuse of the second amendment happens.
So this time I'd say my area is pretty relevant to the situation.
edited 15th Jun '16 1:12:57 PM by LeGarcon
Oh really when?I'll say it again: given violent crime statistics and the statistics on gun safety, the main reason why anyone, "law-abiding citizen" or "gun-crazy redneck" should be concerned about carrying their weapon in public is to wave their gun boner around in an attempt to intimidate people.
The only exceptions are in very specific and generally isolated parts of the country, and if you live there, the solution isn't "more gun".
"It's Occam's Shuriken! If the answer is elusive, never rule out ninjas!"tldr, there are legitimate reasons to want to be armed — and people with concealed carry permits are generally not the people responsible for most gun crime, the occasional case like George Zimmerman aside.
People who want to carry guns in public just to scare people with it are assholes who are usually breaking the law. The vast majority of gun owners and concealed carry permit holders are not these people.
edited 15th Jun '16 1:33:55 PM by NativeJovian
Really from Jupiter, but not an alien.Why is the opposite of concealed carry always assumed to be "waving the gun around"? Whatever happened to neat, lawful, respectful holsters? Possibly with that rubber leash thingy to prevent theft?
Why?
edited 15th Jun '16 1:39:07 PM by TheHandle
Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that.

Actually, Full-auto weapons are de facto banned in the US.
Leviticus 19:34